The Experiential Meaning in Saudi Postgraduate Business Students’ Multimodal Accounting Texts: A Multidimensional ExplorationFootnote^*

* The first author expresses his appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University, as well as the Research Center of the College of Arts for funding the current article. The authors are indebted to the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments.

References

• AlHuthali M 2007 The construction of mechanical engineering literacies: autonomous or social practices? Unpublished MA thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Alshammari B 2011 A cohesion analysis of scientific papers written by Saudi students in an Australian University Unpublished MA thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann DE 2010 ‘Narrative approaches’ in ML Kamil, P Mosenthal, P Pearson & R Barr (eds) Methods of Literacy Research: the methodology chapters from the handbook of reading research (Vol. III). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. pp. 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Alyousef H 2013 ‘An investigation of postgraduate business students’ multimodal literacy and numeracy practices in finance: a multidimensional exploration’ Social Semiotics 23(1): 18–46. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.740204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyousef H 2015a ‘A multimodal discourse analysis of international postgraduate business students’ finance texts: an investigation of theme and information value’ Social Semiotics 1–19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1124518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyousef H 2015b ‘A study of theme and information structure in postgraduate business students’ multimodal written texts: a SF-MDA of management accounting texts’ Paper presented at the 2015 Asian Conference on Language Learning (ACLL 2015): Proceedings of the International Academic Forum), Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Alyousef H & S Alnasser 2015a ‘A study of cohesion in international postgraduate business students’ multimodal written texts: an SF-MDA of a key topic in finance’ The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 8: 56–78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/bjll.v1i0.1047
   Google Scholar
• Alyousef H & S Alnasser 2015b ‘A study of cohesion in international postgraduate students’ multimodal management accounting texts’ Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 6(3): 30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyousef H & P Mickan 2016 ‘Literacy and numeracy practices in postgraduate management accounting’ in R Fidalgo, T Olive, A Archer & EO Breuer (eds) Studies in Writing: vol. 33, multimodality in higher education Leiden: Brill Publishing. pp. 216–240.
   Google Scholar
• Bargiela-Chiappini F 2009 The Handbook of Business Discourse Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett T 2012, August 25 ‘Regard as process type’ Message posted to the Sys-Func Digest, Available at http://listserv.uts.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/sys-func.
   Google Scholar
• Barton D 2000 ‘Researching literacy practices: learning from activities with teachers and students’ in D Barton, M Hamilton & R Ivani (eds) Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context London: Routledge. pp. 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Barton D & M Hamilton 1998 Local Literacies: reading and writing in one community London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton D, M Hamilton & R Ivanič 2000 Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barwell R 2004 ‘What is numeracy?’ For the Learning of Mathematics 24(1): 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Baynham M 2000 ‘Narrative as evidence in literacy research’ Linguistics and Education 11(2): 99–117. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00027-9
   Google Scholar
• Bazley M, P Hancock, A Berry & R Jarvis 2006 Contemporary Accounting 5th edition Stamford: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Biber D, S Johansson, G Leech, S Conrad, E Finegan & R Quirk 1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bloome D, SP Carter, BM Christian, S Otto & N Shuart-Faris 2005 Discourse Analysis and the Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events: a microethnographic perspective Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boughey C 1999 Contrasting constructions of students’ literacy-related experiences at a historically black South African university Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Burch T 2008 ‘Teaching and learning accounting with overseas students’ People and Place 16(1): 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Camiciottoli BC 2010 ‘Discourse connectives in genres of financial disclosure: earnings presentations vs. earnings releases’ Journal of Pragmatics 42(3): 650–663. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden C, B Cope, N Fairclough, J Gee, M Kalantzis, G Kress, et al. 1996 ‘A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures’ Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–93. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R 1999 ‘The poverty of accounting discourse’ Abacus 35(3): 241–251.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy M & MJ Jones 2001 ‘The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 14(3): 311–326. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570110399890
   Google Scholar
• Cope B & M Kalantzis 2000 Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope B & M Kalantzis 2009 ‘“Multiliteracies”: new literacies, new learning’ Pedagogies: An International Journal 4(3): 164–195. doi: 10.1080/15544800903076044
   Google Scholar
• Cope B & M Kalantzis 2013 ‘“Multiliteracies”: new literacies, new learning’ in M Hawkins (ed.) Framing Languages and Literacies: socially situated views and perspectives New York: Routledge. pp. 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK & YS Lincoln 2000 ‘The discipline and practice of qualitative research’ in NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Volume 2 Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. pp. 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Drury H, P O’Carroll & T Langrish 2006 ‘Online approach to teaching report writing in chemical engineering: implementation and evaluation’ International Journal Engineering Education 22(4): 858–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi SF & SJ Ebrahimi 2012 ‘Information development in EFL students composition writing’ Advances in Asian Social Science 1(2): 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Evans S 2010 ‘Business as usual: the use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong’ English for Specific Purposes 29(3): 153–167. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans S 2011 ‘Enhancing the written communicative competence of professionals in Hong Kong’s key industries’ in Discourse, Communication & the Enterprise: Sixth International Conference (DICOEN VI). Unpublished conference presentation. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University (BFSU).
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough N 1989 Language and Power London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett J & R Caruana 2015 ‘Exploring the role of discourse in marketing and consumer research’ Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14: 1–12. doi:10.1002/cb.1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forey G 2002 Aspects of theme and their role in workplace texts. University of Glasgow. Available at http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Print/Theses/ForeyThesis/.
   Google Scholar
• Garzone G 2009 ‘Multimodal analysis’ in F Bargiela-Chiappini (ed.) The Handbook of Business Discourse Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Gee J 1996 Social Linguistics and Literacies: ideology in discourse 2nd edition London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee J 2000 ‘The new literacy studies’ in D Barton, M Hamilton & R Ivanič (eds) Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context London/New York: Routledge. pp. 180–196.
   Google Scholar
• Gee J 2012 Social Linguistics and Literacies: ideology in discourses 4th edition New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gill M 2009 Accountants’ Truth: knowledge and ethics in the financial world New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grawe ND 2015 ‘What are you reading? An analysis of 100,000 numeracy article downloads’ Numeracy: Advancing Education in Quantitative Literacy 8(2): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.8.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Green J & D Bloome 2005 ‘Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: a situated perspective’ in J Flood, S Heath & D Lapp (eds) Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts Volume 1 Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 181–202.
   Google Scholar
• Guo L 2004 ‘Multimodality in a biology textbook’ in K. O’Halloran (ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis: systemic-functional perspectives London/New York: Continuum. pp. 196–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hall JK 2002 Teaching and Researching: language and culture London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1967 ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English: part 2’ Journal of linguistics 3(2): 199–244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1978 Language as Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1993a ‘The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese’ in MAK Halliday & JR Martin (eds) Writing Science: literacy and discursive power London: Falmer Press. pp. 124–132.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1993b ‘On the language of physical science’ in MAK Halliday & JR Martin (eds) Writing Science: literacy and discursive power London: Falmer Press. pp. 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1993c ‘Some grammatical problems in scientific English’ in MAK Halliday & JR Martin (eds) Writing Science: literacy and discursive power London: Falmer Press. pp. 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK 1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar London: Beijing Edward Arnold/Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK & JR Martin 1993 Writing Science: literacy and discursive power London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK & C Matthiessen 2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar London: Hodder-Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK & J Webster 2006 Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse Volume 2 London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock J 2006 Communication Skills Guide for Business Students Adelaide: University of Adelaide. Available at http://www.business.adelaide.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan R 1995 ‘The conception of context in text1’ in PH Fries & M Gregory (eds) Discourse in Society: systemic functional perspectives: meaning and choice in language: studies for Michael Halliday Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. pp. 183–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hasselgård H 2004 ‘Temporal and spatial adjuncts as elements of texture’ Paper presented at the Proceedings from the 14th Euro-International Systemic Functional Workshop. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes T 2015 ‘Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals’ Ampersand 2: 93–100. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Hodge R & G Kress 1988 Social Semiotics Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett J, L Edwards, J Medlin & M Tilling 2009 Financial Accounting 7th edition Milton: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu P-L & W-G Yang 2007 ‘Print and image integration of science texts and reading comprehension: a systemic functional linguistics perspective’ International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5(4): 639–659. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9091-x
   Google Scholar
• Hyland K 2004 Genre and Second Language Writing Ann Arbor, US: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICAA, & CPAA 2009 ‘ Professional accreditation guidelines for higher education programs’ Available at http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au.
   Google Scholar
• IELTS 2011 Institutions – IELTS band scores Available at http://www.ielts.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson S & D Durkee 2008 ‘Incorporating information literacy into the accounting curriculum’ Accounting Education 17(1): 83–97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09639280601026063
   Google Scholar
• Jalilifar A 2010 ‘Thematization in EFL students’ composition writing and its relation to academic experience’ RELC Journal 41(1): 31–45. doi: 10.1177/0033688210362621
   Google Scholar
• Jones J 2006 Multiliteracies for academic purposes: a metafunctional exploration of intersemiosis and multimodality in university textbook and computer-based learning resources in science Unpublished Doctor of EdD thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2259.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis M & B Cope 2012 Literacies Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobel M & C Lankshear 2006 ‘Discussing new literacies’ Language Arts 84(1): 78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J & E Wenger 1991 Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea M & B Street 2006 ‘The “academic literacies” model: theory and applications’ Theory Into Practice 45(4): 368–377. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke A & P Freebody 2000 Literate Futures: report of the literacy review for Queensland state schools Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Manninen A 1997 ‘Critical reading in accounting’ Accounting Education 6(4): 281–294. doi:0.1080/096392897331361
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen C 1999 ‘The system of transitivity: an exploratory study of text-based profiles’ Functions of Language 6(1): 1–51. doi: 10.1075/fol.6.1.02mat
   Google Scholar
• Medve VB & VP Takač 2013 ‘The influence of cohesion and coherence on text quality: a cross-linguistic study of foreign language learners’ in Written Production Language in Cognition and Affect Cham: Springer. pp. 111–131.
   Google Scholar
• Mellos V 2011 Coherence in English as a second language undergraduate writing: a theme-rheme analysis San Diego State University, San Diego. Available at http://sdsu-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.10/1287/Mellos_Vickie.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan C 2006 ‘What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research?’ Educational Studies in Mathematics 61(1): 219–245. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
   Google Scholar
• North S 2005 ‘Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays’ Applied Linguistics 26(3): 431–452. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 1996 The discourses of secondary school mathematics Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia. Available at http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/3360/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 1998 ‘Classroom discourse in mathematics: a multisemiotic analysis’ Linguistics and Education 10(3): 359–388. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00013-3
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 1999 ‘Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts’ Semiotica 124(1-2): 1–30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.124.1-2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 2004 ‘On the effectiveness of mathematics’ in E Ventola, C Charles & M Kaltenbacher (eds), Perspectives on Multimodality Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 2005 Mathematical Discourse: language, symbolism and visual images London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 2008 ‘Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: a systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach’ in F Christie & JR Martin (eds) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: functional linguistic and sociological perspectives London: Continuum. pp. 205–236.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 2009a ‘Multimodal analysis and digital technology’ Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Multimodality Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory and Practice Campobasso: Palladino.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran K 2009b ‘Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA) approach to mathematics, grammar and literacy’ in A McCabe, M O’Donnell & R Whittaker (eds) Advances in Language and Education London/New York: Continuum. (Reprinted from: 2007). pp. 77–102.
   Google Scholar
• Okawa T 2008 Academic literacies in the discipline of nursing: grammar as a resource for producing texts Unpublished MA thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira L & D Cheng 2011 ‘Language and the multisemiotic nature of mathematics’ Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal 11(3): 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Sa’adeddin M 1989 ‘Text development and Arabic-English negative interference’ Applied Linguistics 10(1): 36–51. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner G 2009 ‘Accounting students’ IT application skills over a 10-year period’ Accounting Education 18(1): 7–31. doi: 10.1080/09639280802532224
   Google Scholar
• Street B 1984 Literacy in Theory and Practice Cambridge, New York & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street B 1998 ‘New literacies in theory and practice: what are the implications for language in eduction?’ Linguistics and Education 10(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80103-X
   Google Scholar
• Street B 2003 ‘What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice’ Current Issues in Comparative Education 5(2): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Street B 2012 Literacy and Multimodality: STIS lecture: inter-disciplinary seminars O laboratório SEMIOTEC Belo Horizonte: da FALE/UFMG Faculdade de Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Terre Blanche M & K Durrheim 2002 ‘Histories of the present: social science research in context’ in M Terre Blanche & K Durrheim (eds) Research in Practice: applied methods for the social sciences Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press. pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Terre Blanche M & K Kelly 2002 ‘Interpretive methods’ in M Terre Blanche & K Durrheim (eds) Research in Practice: applied methods for the social sciences Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press. pp. 123–146.
   Google Scholar
• Textalyser 2004 Analysis Tool, Version 1.05, 2011, Available at http://textalyser.net/.
   Google Scholar
• The Business School 2009 Accounting Concepts and Methods Course Outline Adelaide, Australia: Faculty of the Professions, University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J 1997 ‘Discourse in the marketplace: the making of meaning in annual reports’ Journal of Business Communication 34(1): 47–66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194369703400103
   Google Scholar
• Vannini P 2007 ‘Social semiotics and fieldwork: method and analytics’ Qualitative Inquiry 13(1): 113–140. doi: 10.1177/1077800406295625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams M 2000 ‘Interpretivism and generalisation’ Sociology 34(2): 209–224. doi: 10.1177/S0038038500000146
   Google Scholar