A typological study on the syntactic variations of counterfactual clauses

References

• Abbasi, Z., & Yaqubinejad, H. (2021). Typological analysis of counterfactual conditions in Persian language. The International Journal of Humanities, 28(4), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.52547/eijh.28.4.91
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, A. Y. (1998). Warekena. In D. C. Derbyshire, & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (pp. 225–439). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Akatsuka, N. (1986). Conditionals are discourse-bound. In E. C. Tragugott, A. T. Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferg (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 333–351). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arregui, A. (2009). On similarity in counterfactuals. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(3), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9060-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, R. E., & Kumari, T. C. (1997). Malayalam. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, T. K. (1983). Chinese and English counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited. Cognition, 15(1–3), 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90038-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassetti, B. (2022). Language and counterfactual reasons in Chinese, English and Chinese L1–English L2 reasoners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(1), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211022850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1978). Language samples. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol.4) (pp. 123–156). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R. (1998). CF marking in the modern Indo-Aryan languages. Unpublished manuscript of talk given at the University of Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, B. (2008). A refined sampling procedure for genealogical control. Language Typology and Universals, 61(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0022
   Google Scholar
• Bjorkman, B., & Halpert, C. (2012). In an imperfect world: Deriving the typology of counterfactual marking. Presented at Modality Workshop, University of Ottawa. Handout.
   Google Scholar
• Blackings, M., & Fabb, N. (2003). A grammar of Ma’di. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, A. H. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the west. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, A., & Alexander, M. A. (1997). Maltese. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bugenhagen, R. (1994). The exponents of semantic primitives in Mangap-Mbula. In C. Goddard, & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings (pp. 97–108). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bugenhagen, R. (1995). A grammar of Mangap-Mbula: An Austronesian language of Papua New Guinea. Notes on linguistics. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Bystrov, I. S., & Stankeviċ, N. V. (2005). Conditional constructions in Vietnamese. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 498–511). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. (1986). Conditionals: A typology. In E. C. Tragugott, A. T. Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferg (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 77–79). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, M. M. (1969). Tzotzil grammar. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (2002). Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofaro, S. (2003). Subordination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cysouw, M. (2007). New approaches to cluster analysis of typological indices. In P. Grzybek, & R. Kőhler (Eds.), Exact methods in the study of language and text (pp. 61–76). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ő. (1997). The relation between past time reference and counterfactuality: A new look. In A. Athanasiadou, & R. Diven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp. 97–114). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, M. S. (1992). The Greenberg world order correlations. Language, 68(1), 81–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, P. K. (2008). Counterfactual conditionals in Scandinavian languages: Crossbreds, mutants and freaks. Nordic Microcomparative Syntax (NORMS) Workshop on Auxiliaries and Modality, Trondheim. Handout.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. (1995). A grammar of Kayardild with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N., & Watanabe, H. (Eds.). (2016). Insubordination. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L., & Kern, B. (1997). Wari’ – the Pacaas Novos language of western Brazil. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035693
   Google Scholar
• Fleischman, S. (1989). Temporal distance: A basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language, 13(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.02fle
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, W. A. (1991). The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, G. (1979). Big Nambas grammar. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Baehr, P. (2005). Bariai grammar sketch. Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1991). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1995). Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 47–77). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. (1986). Maricopa morphology and syntax. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Universals of language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, J. (1983). Paratactic if-clauses. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90014-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haiman, J. (1985). Natural syntax. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, J., & Kuteva, T. (2002). The symmetry of counterfactuals. In J. L. Bybee, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse. (Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson.) (pp. 101–124). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Halpert, C. (2011). Zulu counterfactuals in and out of conditionals: Consequences for counterfactual typology. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/acal/41/paper2742.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (1993). A grammar of Lezgian. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Haude, K. (2006). A grammar of Movima. Drukkerij Manta.
   Google Scholar
• Hetterle, K. (2015). Adverbial clauses in cross-linguistic perspective. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, G. (1995). Georgian: A Structural Reference. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hoa, D. (1974). Colloquial Vietnamese (2nd Edition). Feffer and Simons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbach, B. E. (2015). Notes on tense, mood, and negation in Mixtec languages. Bartholomew collection of unpublished materials.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hualde, J. I., & de Urbina, J. O. (2003). A grammar of Basque. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iatridou, S. (2009). Some thoughts about the imperfective in counterfactuals. Handout.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, M. (2002). On the semantic composition of subjunctive conditionals. http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~rthomaso/lpw02/Ippolito.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, M. (2003). Implicatures and presuppositions in counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics, 11(2), 145–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024411924818
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, M. (2006). Semantic composition and presupposition projection in subjunctive conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(6), 631–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9006-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. (1982). Past tense and the hypothetical: A cross-linguistic study. Studies in Language, 6(3), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.3.04jam
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaszai, L., & Tóth, E. (2005). Conditional constructions in Hungarian. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 416–424). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, N. (2012). Temporal and co-varying clause combining in Austronesian languages. Semantics, morpho-syntax and distributional patterns [Doctoral Dissertation]. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, W. (2021). Another way to look at counterfactuals. Theoretical Linguistics, 47(3-4), 189–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2021-2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (1994). Finiteness. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics: Vol. 3 (pp. 1245–1248). Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kouwenberg, S. (1994). A grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Lazard, G. (2006). La Quête Des Invariants Interlangues. Honoré Champion.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, C., & Brousseau, A. M. (2002). A grammar of Fongbe. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, C. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing company (pp. 181–226). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Linden, A., & Verstraete, J. (2008). The nature and origins of counterfactuality in simple clauses: Cross-linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1865–1895). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, L., & Lynch, J. (1994). Kwamera. Lincom.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, R. E. (1983). Switch reference systems in two distinct linguistic areas: Wojokes (Papua New Guinea) and Guanano (Northern South America). In J. Haiman, & P. Munro (Eds.), Switch reference and universal grammar (pp. 185–208). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, U. (2004). Finite and nonfinite from a typological perspective. Linguistics, 42(2), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, L. (1990). A grammar of Tauya. Mouton de Gruyten.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinson, G. (1986). Romanian language grammar. In B. Comrie (Ed.), Croom Helm descriptive grammars (pp. 74–77). Croom Helm Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). The structure of discourse and subordination. In J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 275–330). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, C., & van der Auwera, J. (2012). Connectives. In A. Keith, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 347–402). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, W. (1990). A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Miestamo, M., Bakker, D., & Arppe, A. (2016). Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology, 20(2), 233–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins, A. I. (2002). Counterfactuality without past tense. Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS), 32, 441–450. Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolle, S. (2017). Introduction to special issue on conditional constructions in African languages. Studies in African Linguistics, 46, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v46i1.107239
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, I., & Tolskaya, M. (2001). A grammar of Udihe. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, M. (1992). A grammar of Lango. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky, B. Y. (2005). Conditional constructions in Dari. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 195–217). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Overall, S. (2017). A typology of frustrative marking in Amazonian languages. In A. Y. Aikhenvald, & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 477–512). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, B. (2008). Kokota grammar. University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelmouter, I. A. (2005). Conditional constructions in Homeric Greek. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 246–278). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. (1980). The covariation of grammar and culture [Dissertation of State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. (1989). Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language, 13(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.04per
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plag, I. (1992). From speech act verb to conjunction: the grammaticalization of Taki in Sranan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 7, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.7.1.03pla
   Google Scholar
• Pilhofer, G. (1933). Grammatik der Kâte-Sprache in Neuguinea. Vierzehntes Beihelf zur Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen. Dietrich Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., Hengeveld, K., & Kahrel, P. (1993). A method of language sampling. Studies in Language, 17(1), 169–203. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.1.07rij
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, A., & Sanders, J. (1994). Kamasau (Wand Tuan) grammar: Morpheme to sentence. http://www.sil.org/pacific/png/abstract.asp?id=47683
   Google Scholar
• Santamaria, C., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scatton, E. (1984). A reference grammar of Bulgarian. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtke-Bode, K. (2009). A typology of purpose clauses. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtke-Bode, K., & Holger, D. (2019). The typology of non-argument clauses. In A. Benz, W. Frey, & H. Gärtner, et al. (Eds.), Unpublished. Handbook of Clausal Embedding. Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuh, R. G. (1988). A grammar of Miya. Berkeley. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, W. (1985). Imonda, a Papuan language. In S. A. Wurm (Ed.), Pacific linguistics (series B), 93 (pp. 204–205). The Australia National University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnova, M. A., & Dobronravin, N. A. (2005). Conditional constructions in Hausa. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 425–450). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar, S. N. (2007). Modern Kannada grammar. Manohar Pulishers & Distributors.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1975). Indicative conditionals. Philosophia, 5(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Textor, M. (2020). States of affairs. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. University of Stanford. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/states-of-affairs/
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A. (2007). Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text, 5, 55–84. (Original work published 1915).
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin, R. S. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, E. & Heine, B. (Eds.), (1991). Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume I. Theoretical and methodological issues. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tsunoda, T. (2011). A grammar of Warrongo. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, H. (1995). A grammar of Hunzib (with texts and lexicon). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valin, R. (2021). Challenges at the syntax–semantics–pragmatics interface: A role and reference grammar perspective. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• von Prince, K. (2015). A grammar of Daakaka. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Voort, H. (2004). A grammar of Kwazá. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Vydrin, A. (2011). Counterfactual mood in Iranian. In L. Paul (Ed.), Handbuch Der Iranistik (Topics in Iranian linguistics) (pp. 72–86). Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wacke, K. (1931). Formenlehre der Ono-Sprache (Neuguinea). Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen, 21, 161–208.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. Y. (2012). The ingredients of counterfactuality in Mandarin Chinese [PhD Dissertation of Hong Kong Polytechnic University].
   Google Scholar
• Watters, D. E. (2006). Notes on Kusunda grammar – a language isolate of Nepal. Himalayan Linguistics Archive, 3, 1–182.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, D. J. (1983). A grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua (Portion of text in Quechua). University Microfilms International.
   Google Scholar
• Xrakovskij, V. S. (2005). A questionnaire on conditional constructions. In V. S. Xrakovskij (Ed.), Typology of conditional constructions (pp. 3–95). Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, R. (1996). A reference grammar of Maithili. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, Q. (2022). The study of Mandarin counterfactuals under the perspective of typology. World Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegeler, D. P. (2000). Hypothetical Modality: Grammaticalisation in an L2 Dialect. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar