Gender in Planning Education

References

• Agrest, D, Conway, P. and Kanes Weisman, L. (eds) 1996. The sex of architecture. Harry Abrams Inc., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C., 2007, ‘Policy Challenges In South Australia: Gender Equality Policy: A field of contestation’ on South Australian Policy Online, http://www.sap0.0rg.au/0pin/0pin8003.html, as accessed 3/11/07.
   Google Scholar
• Bannerji, H. 2000. ‘The paradox of diversity: the construction of a multiracial Canada and women of colour’. Women Studies International Forum. Vol. 23, No. 3, PP537–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenberg, E., 2004. ‘Engendering effective planning’. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 70, No. 3, pp269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondi, L, 2003. ‘Gender Symbols and Urban Landscapes’, in Cuthbert, A, eds. Designing Cities, chapter 16. pp 204–217. Blackwell, Maiden.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, J. 2006. ‘Transport: Disciplining the Body that Travels’. In S Bohm, C Land, C Jones & M Paterson (eds), Against Automobility. Blackwell, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham J. and Ferretti. 1999. ‘Imagining the Street’, In E Stratford (ed) Australian Cultural Geographies, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, K, and Blecha, J, 2007. ‘Feminism and Social Theory’ in Geography: An Introduction (Focus). The Professional Geographer. Volume 59, No. 1, February 2007 pp1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fanstein, S. and Servon, L., 2005. Gender Planning: A Reader. Rutgers University Press, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, D. 1995. ‘Tales of One City: Gender Relations In the Adelaide Metropolitan Planning Review’, Proceedings of the Portraits of Planning Conference, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, D. and Bonham, J. 2001. ‘Travel blending. Whither regulation’. Australian Geographical Studies. Volume 39, No. 3, pp 302–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., 2007. ‘Space, Gender and Institutions in Processes Creating Difference’. Gender, Space and Place. Vol. 14 No. 1, pp 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greed, C. 2003. Inclusive urban planning. Elsevier, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Greed and Reeves, 2005. ‘Mainstreaming Equality Into Strategic Spatial Policy making: Are Town Planners Losing Sight of Gender?’. Construction Management and Economics. (December). 23, pp 1059–1070. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., 2007. Personal email from State Manager of Planning Institute of Australia as received 14/11/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. 1994. Gender planning and the policy process. Elsevier, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S., 2000. ‘The social construction of scale’. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, L, 1999. Gender, identity and place. Polity Press, Great Britain.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J. B. 1992. ‘Centre or periphery? Town planning and spatial political economy’. Environment and Planning A. Vol. 26, No. 7, pp1111–22.
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, W., 1970. Man and his urban environment: a sociological approach. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, US.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, J. Joos Droogleever Fortuijin, Raleigh, C. 2004. The representation of women In academic geography: contexts, climate and curricula. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. Vol. 28, N0.1, pp83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. 1993. Gender mainstreaming in the EU: principles and practice, Hertford College, Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Niranjana, S., 2001, Gender and space: femininity, sexualization and the female body. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. and Jackson, C., 1998. Feminist visions of development: gender analysis and policy. Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• PIA 2007. ‘Accredited courses’. Planning Institute of Australia website, accessed August 2007. http://www.planning.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• PIA 2002. ‘Education policy for recognition of Australian planning qualifications’, Planning Institute of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rahder B. and Altilia, C., 2004, ‘Where is feminism In planning going? Appropriation or transformation?’. Planning Theory. Vol 3, No. 2, pp. 107–116. Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock L, 1998. Towards cosmopolis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive Social Research, 2003. ‘Learning from experience: lessons In mainstreaming equal opportunities’. Institute of Governance, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, D., 1995, Geographies of exclusion: society and difference in the west. Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Spain, D., 2005, ‘What Happened to Gender Relations?’. Gender and Planning a Reader. Fainstein S, Servon, L.(eds) Rutgers University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Spain, D, 1993 ‘Gendered spaces and women's status’. Sociological Theory. Vol. 11, No. 2, July 1993. pp.137–151.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S, 2005. ‘Gender mainstreaming: productive tensions in theory and practice’. Social Politics. Fall, pp 321–343.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. 2001. The power of planning: spaces of control and transformation. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. 1998. ‘Planning and social control: exploring the dark side’. Journal of Planning Literature. Vol. 12, No. 4, pp395–406.
   Google Scholar