Applying a shared understanding between Aboriginal and Western knowledge to challenge unsustainable neo-liberal planning policy and practices

References

• Alexander, E. R. 2000. “Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Post-Postmodernist Perspective.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 242–256. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., and L. Porter. 2011. “Indigenous Recognition in State-Based Planning Systems: Understanding Textual Mediation in the Contact Zone.” Planning Theory 11 (2): 170–187. doi: 10.1177/1473095211427285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S. 2004. “‘Appropriate’ Policy Knowledge, and Institutional and Governance Implications.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 63 (1): 22–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., and G. Walker. 2005. “Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning.” Urban Studies 42 (12): 2123–2144. doi: 10.1080/00420980500332098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borschmann, G. 2015. “ Wangan and Jagalingou People Reject $16 Billion Carmichael Mine to be Built in Central Queensland.” ABC News. Accessed March 30, 2015. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-26/wangan-jagalingou-people-say-no-to-16-billion-carmichael-mine-q/6349252.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., and D. Grant-Smith. 2005. “Building Citizens: Participatory Planning Practice and a Transformative Politics of Difference.” Urban Policy and Research 23 (1): 21–36. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000335296
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2006. “From Neoliberalism to Neoliberalisation: Consolations, Confusions, and Necessary Illusions.” Environment and Planning A 38 (1): 1–6. doi: 10.1068/a38147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2015. “Geography and Global Change Science: Relationships Necessary, Absent, and Possible.” Geographical Research 53 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. 1999. What is This Thing Called Science? 3rd ed. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. 2006. “Evidence-Based Planning.” disP – The Planning Review 42 (165): 14–24. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, M. 1997. Human Rights are Non-Negotiable. Australia Institute Newsletter. No. 10. March. Canberra: The Australian Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. and F. Gottweis, eds. 2012. The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1978. “The Epistemology of Social Practice.” Theory and Society 6 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1007/BF01566158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 2011. Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gammage, B. 2011. The Biggest Estate On Earth: How Aborigines Made Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, S., and B. Sithole. 2007. Sustainable Northern Landscapes and the Nexus with Indigenous Health: Healthy Country, Healthy People. Canberra: Land & Water Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., and N. Low. 2000. Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. 2010. “Planning as the Ideology of (Neoliberal) Space.” Planning Theory 9 (4): 298–314. doi: 10.1177/1473095210368878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heazle, M. 2010. Uncertainty in Policy Making. Values and Evidence in Complex Decisions. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbard, M., M. Lane, and K. Rasmussen. 2008. “The Split Personality of Planning: Indigenous Peoples and Planning for Land and Resource Management’.” Journal of Planning Literature 23 (2): 136–151. doi: 10.1177/0885412208322922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, R., and S. Suchet-Pearson. 2006. “Rethinking the Building Blocks: Ontological Pluralism and the Idea of ‘Management’.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88 (3): 323–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, C., M. Seini, D. McCallum, and N. Osborne. 2011. “Neoliberalism, Mineral Development and Indigenous People: A Framework for Analysis.” Australian Geographer 42 (3): 309–323. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2011.595890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 157–162. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780542
   Google Scholar
• Kellow, A. 2007. Science and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, R. T. 2007. “Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy.” Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 21 (1): 12–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., A. March, and C. Mouat. 2014. “‘Limits and Potentials to Deliberative Engagement in Highly Regulated Planning System's: Norm Development Within Fixed Rules.” Planning Theory and Practice 15 (1): 26–40. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.866264
   Google Scholar
• Lennie, J. 1999. “Deconstructing Gendered Power Relations in Participatory Planning: Towards an Empowering Feminist Framework of Participation and Action.” In Women's Studies International Forum 22 (1): 97–112. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(98)00098-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low Choy, D. 2008. “The SEQ Regional Landscape Framework: Is Practice Ahead of Theory?” Urban Policy and Research 26: 111–124. doi: 10.1080/08111140701697628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low Choy, D. C., J. Wadsworth, and D. Burns. 2010. “Seeing the Landscape Through New Eyes: Identifying and Incorporating Indigenous Landscape Values into Regional Planning Processes.” Australian Planner 47: 178–190. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2010.509337
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, D. 2008. “Participatory Planning and Means-Ends Rationality: A Translation Problem.” Planning Theory & Practice 9 (3): 325–343. doi: 10.1080/14649350802277852
   Google Scholar
• Marston, G. 2003. “Tampering With the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Policy-Making.” The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs 3 (3): 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• McBryde, I. 2000. “Travellers in Storied Landscapes: A Case Study in Exchanges and Heritage.” Aboriginal History 24: 152–174.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. A. 2014a. “Science in Sustainability: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Science–Policy Interface in Sustainable Water Resource Management.” The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice 9 (2): 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. A. 2014b. “ Science & Sustainability: The Use of Science and the Science–Policy Interface in Sustainable Water Resource Management.” PhD thesis, Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, E. A., and D. C. C. Grant-Smith. 2015. “Tales of Science and Defiance: The Case For Co-Learning and Collaboration in Bridging the Science/Emotion Divide in Water Recycling Debates.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (10): 1770–1788. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2014.954691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2004. “Science and Public Policy: What's Proof Got to Do With It?” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5): 369–383. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, Jr, R. A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. 2006. “Planning in (Post)Colonial Settings: Challenges for Theory and Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 7 (4): 383–396. doi: 10.1080/14649350600984709
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. 2014. “Possessory Politics and the Conceit of Procedure: Exposing the Cost of Rights Under Conditions of Dispossession.” Planning Theory 13 (4): 387–406. doi: 10.1177/1473095214524569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Government in Association with South East Regional Organisation of Councils (SEQROC). 2009. South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031. Brisbane: Department of Infrastructure and Planning. Randolph.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Health. 2011. “ Guidelines for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Terminology Queensland Government.” http://www.health.qld.gov.au/atsihealth/documents/terminology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rockstrom, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, A. Persson, F. S. Chapin, E. F. Lambin, T. M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461: 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 1995. Land Management Issues: Attitudes and Perceptions Amongst Aboriginal People of Central Australia. Alice Springs: Central Land Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 1999. “Indigenous Ecologies and an Ethic of Connection.” In Global Ethics and Environment, edited by N. Low, 175–187. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. 2011. Indigenous Peoples and the Collaborative Stewardship of Nature: Knowledge Binds and Institutional Conflicts. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., and N. Gurran. 2014. “Australian Planning System Reform.” Australian Planner 51 (2): 102–107. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2014.896065
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1998. Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History. Vol. 2. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. R. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (5): 385–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, P. 2012. Sustainable Landscape Planning the Reconnection Agenda. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spruijt, P., A. B. Knol, E. Vasileiadou, J. Devilee, E. Lebret, and A. C. Petersen. 2014. “Roles of Scientists as Policy Advisers on Complex Issues: A Literature Review.” Environmental Science & Policy 40: 16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., and P. Allmendinger. 1998. “Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning.” Environment and Planning A 30 (11): 1975–1989. doi: 10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNPFII (United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues). 2008. “ Guidelines on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues.” http://www2ohchr.org/english.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., and J. Edelenbos. 2004. “Conflicting Knowledge: Why is Joint Knowledge Production Such a Problem?” Science and Public Policy 31 (4): 289–299. doi: 10.3152/147154304781779967
   Google Scholar
• Waters, L. 2010. “Queensland and the Traveston Dam.” In Mills, Mines and Other Controversies: The Environmental Assessment of Major Projects, edited by T. Bonyhady and A. Macintosh, 125–159. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 1999. “Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics.” Science and Public Policy 26 (3): 151–161. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782437
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., K. Lloyd, S. Suchet-Pearson, L. Burarrwanga, M. Tofa, and Bawaka Country. 2012. “Telling Stories in, Through and with Country: Engaging with Indigenous and More-Than-Human Methodologies at Bawaka, NE Australia.” Journal of Cultural Geography 29: 39–60. doi: 10.1080/08873631.2012.646890
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. 1995. “Planning as Control: Policy and Resistance in Deeply Divided Societies.” Progress in Planning 44: 115–84. doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(95)90158-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1989. “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship.” Ethics 99 (2): 250–274. doi: 10.1086/293065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar