Beyond engagement theatre: challenging institutional constraints of participatory planning practice

References

• Adkins, Lisa. 2011. “Cultural Intermediaries.” In Encyclopedia of Consumer Culture, edited by Dale Southerton, 389–391. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasiu, Irina. 2019. “Unpacking the Smart City Through the Lens of the Right to the City: A Taxonomy as a Way Forward in Participatory City-Making.” In The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by Michiel de Lange and Martijn de Waal, 239–260. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, Luc, Jack L. Nasar, and Emily Talen. 2011. “Where Do Planners Belong? Assessing the Relationship Between Planning and Design in American Universities.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 196–207. doi:10.1177/0739456X11402356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, Michael, Martin R. Gibbs, and Philippa Wright. 2003. “Intranets and Local Community: ‘Yes, an Intranet Is All Very Well, but Do We Still Get Free Beer and a Barbeque?’” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies, edited by Marleen Huysman, Etienne Wenger, and Volker Wulf, 185–204. Amsterdam, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Interviewing Experts. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, Neil. 2017. “Is Tactical Urbanism an Alternative to Neoliberal Urbanism?” In Critique of Urbanization: Selected Essays, edited by Neil Brenner, 128–146. Bauwelt Fundamente. Basel, CH: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Greg, and Marketta Kyttä. 2014. “Key Issues and Research Priorities for Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): A Synthesis Based on Empirical Research.” Applied Geography 46 (January): 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, Paolo, and Rob Kitchin. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (5): 813–830. doi:10.1177/0263774X18806508. SAGE Publications Ltd STM.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, Paolo, Rob Kitchin, and Cesare Di Feliciantonio. 2018. “Living Labs and Vacancy in the Neoliberal City.” Cities 73 (March): 44–50. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.008. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Castell, Pål. 2016. “Institutional Framing of Citizen Initiatives: A Challenge for Advancing Public Participation in Sweden.” International Planning Studies 21 (4): 305–316. doi:10.1080/13563475.2015.1124756. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin, Peter. 2015. “The Cultural Intermediary in Plutocratic Times.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (3): 265–282. doi:10.1177/1367549414526732. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, R. D., and Dovers S. R. 2020. Institutional Change and Learning for Sustainable Development – Working Paper 2002/1 (Canberra, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, ANU). Accessed 10 May 2021. Available at https://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/fenner-publications/occasional/cres/connor_doverscres-wp02-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Lange, Michiel, and Martijn de Waal. 2013. “Owning the City: New Media and Citizen Engagement in Urban Design.” First Monday, November. doi:10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus. 2017. “Lessons from Urban Guerrilla Placemaking for Smart City Commons.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 32–35. C&T ‘17. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/3083671.3083707.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus. 2018. “Participatory Urban Informatics: Towards Citizen-Ability.” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 7 (1): 4–19. doi:10.1108/SASBE-10-2017-0051. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, and Barbara Adkins. 2006. “A Research Design to Build Effective Partnerships Between City Planners, Developers, Government and Urban Neighbourhood Communities.” Journal of Community Informatics 2 (2): 116–133. doi:10.15353/joci.v2i2.2079.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, and Martin Brynskov. 2016. “Participatory Action Research for Civic Engagement.” In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice, edited by Eric Gordon and Paul Mihailidis, 563–580. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015a. Citizen’s Right to the Digital City: Urban Interfaces, Activism, and Placemaking. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-919-6.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, Glenda Caldwell, Joel Fredericks, and Kirsty Volz. 2018. “Augmenting Cities Beyond Bedazzlement: Empowering Local Communities through Immersive Urban Technologies.” In Workshop Proceedings of Augmenting Cities and Architecture with Immersive Technologies, Media Architecture Biennale (MAB-18), 1–4. Media Architecture Biennale. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/122841/.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, Martin Tomitsch, Christine Satchell, and Matthias Haeusler. 2015b. “From Users to Citizens: Some Thoughts on Designing for Polity and Civics.” In Proceedings of the 27th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI 2015), edited by M. Gibbs, W. Smith, M. Carter, and B. Ploderer, 623–633. United States of America: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2838739.2838769.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, Marcus, and Troy John Turner. 2019. “The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies (C&T ‘19), 24–28. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/3328320.3328398.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, Christopher, Marcus Foth, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. “On Scale, Dialectics, and Affect: Pathways for Proliferating Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference (PDC ‘18), 1:Article 12. ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210591.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, Joel, Glenda Amayo Caldwell, Marcus Foth, and Martin Tomitsch. 2019. “The City as Perpetual Beta: Fostering Systemic Urban Acupuncture.” In The Hackable City: Digital Media and Collaborative City-Making in the Network Society, edited by Michiel de Lange and Martijn de Waal, 67–92. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, Joel, and Marcus Foth. 2013. “Augmenting Public Participation: Enhancing Planning Outcomes Through the Use of Social Media and Web 2.0.” Australian Planner 50 (3): 244–256. doi:10.1080/07293682.2012.748083. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1999. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York City, New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, Michael. 2011. “Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 184–195. doi:10.1177/0739456X10393358. SAGE Publications Inc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy Peters, B., and Jon Pierre. 2007. Institutionalism. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. 2017. Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory: Critical Essays in Planning Theory. Vol. 3. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315259451
   Google Scholar
• Hespanhol, Luke, Martin Tomitsch, Ian McArthur, Joel Fredericks, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2016. “Situated Interfaces for Engaging Citizens on the Go.” Interactions 23 (1): 40–45. doi:10.1145/2851200. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Henric Benesch, and Jon Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006. Taylor & Francis.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAP2. 2019. “Public Participation Spectrum.” International Association for Public Participation. International Association for Public Participation. https://www.iap2.org.au/resources/spectrum/.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York City, New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jeffrey, and Matthew Cook. 2014. “Policy Design: A New Area of Design Research and Practice.” In Complex Systems Design & Management, 51–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02812-5_4. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Karwat, Darshan M. A., Walter E. Eagle, Margaret S. Wooldridge, and Thomas E. Princen. 2015. “Activist Engineering: Changing Engineering Practice by Deploying Praxis.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1): 227–239. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9525-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. 2004. “‘I Plan, You Participate’: A Southern View of Community Participation in Urban Australia.” Community Development Journal 39 (1): 13–27. doi:10.1093/cdj/39.1.13. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lodato, Thomas, and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. “Institutional Constraints: The Forms and Limits of Participatory Design in the Public Realm.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 5. ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210595.
   Google Scholar
• Lydon, Mike, and Anthony Garcia. 2015. Tactical Urbanism: Short-Term Action for Long-Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, Ali. 2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (2): 173–193. doi:10.1080/13574800600644035. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattern, Shannon. 2020. “Post-It Note City.” Places Journal (February). doi:10.22269/200211.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Tony. 2013. “Institutional Perspectives on Operationalising Climate Adaptation Through Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 14 (2): 198–210. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.781208. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Monno, Valeria, and Abdul Khakee. 2012. “Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning.” International Planning Studies 17 (1): 85–101. doi:10.1080/13563475.2011.638181. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Cameron K., and Paul Frijters. 2017. Game of Mates: How Favours Bleed the Nation. Kirra Beach, QLD: Publicious. https://gameofmates.com/.
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808678.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peçanha Enqvist, Johan, Simon West, Vanessa A. Masterson, L. Jamila Haider, Uno Svedin, and Maria Tengö. 2018. “Stewardship as a Boundary Object for Sustainability Research: Linking Care, Knowledge and Agency.” Landscape and Urban Planning 179 (November): 17–37. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. 2015. Better Planning for Queensland – Next Steps in Planning Reform Directions Paper. Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. 2017. Community Engagement Toolkit for Planning. Queensland Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning. https://planning.dsdmip.qld.gov.au/planning/better-planning.
   Google Scholar
• Rein, Martin, and Donald Schön. 1996. “Frame-Critical Policy Analysis and Frame-Reflective Policy Practice.” Knowledge and Policy 9 (1): 85–104. doi:10.1007/BF02832235. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roggema, Rob. 2014. “The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures.” Springer, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, Kristian. 2019. “Public Knowledge of and Involvement with Metropolitan and Local Strategic Planning in Australia.” Planning Practice & Research 34 (3): 288–304. doi:10.1080/02697459.2019.1590771. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, Kristian, and Nicole Gurran. 2014. “Australian Planning System Reform.” Australian Planner 51 (2): 102–107. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.896065. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeter, Ronald, and Marcus Foth. 2009. “Discussions in Space.” In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, 381–384. OZCHI ‘09. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1738826.1738903.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeter, Ronald, and Kirralie Houghton. 2011. “Neo-Planning: Location-Based Social Media to Engage Australia’s New Digital Locals.” Australian Planner 48 (3): 191–202. doi:10.1080/07293682.2011.595059. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seeburger, Jan, Marcus Foth, and Dian Tjondronegoro. 2012. “Designing and Evaluating Mobile Multimedia User Experiences in Public Urban Places: Making Sense of the Field.” In Mobile Multimedia - User and Technology Perspectives, edited by D. Tjondronegoro, 117–132. Croatia: InTech. doi:10.5772/39050.
   Google Scholar
• Sipe, Neil, and Karen Vella. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Australian Urban and Regional Planning. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, Maurizio, Marcus Foth, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Irina Anastasiu Cioaca, and Peter Lyle. 2020. “Tales of Institutioning and Commoning: Participatory Design Processes with a Strategic and Tactical Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385020.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2016. “The New Urban Agenda.” The United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development. http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, Kristof, and Gert Verschraegen. 2008. “The Limits of Planning: Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory and the Analysis of Planning and Planning Ambitions.” Planning Theory 7 (3): 263–283. doi:10.1177/1473095208094824. SAGE Publications.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, Sirkku, Liisa Horelli, and Joanna Saad-Sulonen. 2010. “Digital Tools in Participatory Planning. Espoo: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, Bianca. 2018. Searching for the Smart City’s Democratic Future. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/searching-smart-citys-democratic-future.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, Tan, Marcus Foth, and Md Kamruzzaman. 2019. “Towards Post-Anthropocentric Cities: Reconceptualizing Smart Cities to Evade Urban Ecocide.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (2): 147–152. doi:10.1080/10630732.2018.1524249. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar