Learning to mark: exemplars, dialogue and participation in assessment communities

References

• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619–644. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. (2009). Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 209–220. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: The role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670. doi: 10.1080/03075071003777716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Blackwell, R. (2006). Managing temporary workers in Higher Education: Still at the margin?. Personnel Review, 35(2), 207–225. doi: 10.1108/00483480610645830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat?. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345. doi: 10.1080/01411920701532269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.283.15167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detterman, D., & Sternberg, R. (1993). Transfer on trial. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. (1979). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., Purnell, K., & Zipf, R. (2008). Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1080/02602930601125681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., & Williams, L. (2011). From copying to learning? Using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 95–108. doi: 10.1080/02602930903201669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawitz, J. (2009). Learning in the academic workplace: The harmonization of the collective and individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 601–614. doi: 10.1080/03075070802556149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P., Baume, D., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2007). Enhancing part-time teaching in Higher Education: A challenge for institutional policy and practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(4), 420–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00350.x
   Google Scholar
• Laming, D. (2004). Human judgement: The eye of the beholder. London: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000216642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 248–273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: Ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Magnolia, MA: Peter Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2005). Assessment standards: The role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 215–230. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063793
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209. doi: 10.1080/0305498870130207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000264262
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (2007). Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 14(3), 387–392.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (2009). Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 807–826. doi: 10.1080/03075070802706553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay, S. (2004). The assessment of complex performance: A socially situated interpretive act. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 307–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221–240. doi: 10.1080/0729436022000020742
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., Bridges, P., & Woolf, H. (2000). Mark distributions and marking practices in UK Higher Education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1177/1469787400001001002
   Google Scholar
• Webster, F., Pepper, D., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Assessing the undergraduate dissertation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 71–80. doi: 10.1080/02602930050025042
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar