658
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Expectancy-value and cognitive process outcomes in mathematics learning: a structural equation analysis

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 133–149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Britner, S.L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. doi: 10.1002/tea.20131
  • Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • DeBacker, T.K., & Nelson, R.M. (1999). Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71–94. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0984
  • Dewey, J. (1909/1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: DC Health.
  • Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191–195. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003
  • Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
  • Eccles, J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freemen.
  • Entwistle, N.J. (1990). Student learning and classroom environment. In N. Jones & N. Frederickson (Eds.), Refocusing educational psychology (pp. 8–30). New York: Falmer.
  • Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P.J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(Pt 4), 873–891. doi: 10.1348/000709907X189118
  • Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  • Greene, B.A., & Miller, R.B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181–192. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
  • Grushka, K., McLeod, J.H., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian university teacher education program. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 239–246. doi: 10.1080/14623940500106187
  • Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Carter, S.M., Letho, A.T., & Elliot, A.J. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classrooms: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1284–1295. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284
  • Justicia, F., Carmen Pichardo, M., Cano, F., Berbén, A.B.G., & de la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmator factor analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41(3), 355–372. doi: 10.1007/BF03173004
  • Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., Loke, A.Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., et al. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–389. doi: 10.1080/713611442
  • Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., & Bieschke, K.J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424–430. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
  • Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., Brown, S.D., & Gore, P.A. (1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 292–308. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1996.0045
  • Leung, D.Y.P., & Kember, D. (2003). The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 61–71. doi: 10.1080/01443410303221
  • Liem, A.D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001
  • Loehlin, J.C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path and structural equation analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lopez, F.G., & Lent, R. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. Career Development Quarterly, 41(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00350.x
  • Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.41
  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543
  • Pajares, F., Johnson, J., & Usher, E.L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120.
  • Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
  • Pedro, J. (2005). Reflection in teacher education: Exploring pre-service teachers’ meanings of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 6(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1080/1462394042000326860
  • Phan, H.P. (2007). An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the University of the South Pacific: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 789–806. doi: 10.1080/01443410701349809
  • Phan, H.P. (2009a). Exploring students' reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology, 29(3), 297–313. doi: 10.1080/01443410902877988
  • Phan, H.P. (2009b). Relations between goals, self-efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777–799. doi: 10.1080/01443410903289423
  • Phan, H.P. (2010). Students' academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: An integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1080/01443410903573297
  • Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Rogosa, D. (1979). Causal models in longitudinal research: Rationale, formulation and interpretation. In J.R. Nesselroade & P.B. Balles (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behaviour and development (pp. 263–302). New York: Academic Press.
  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schunk, D.H. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 149–174. doi: 10.3102/00346543057002149
  • Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
  • Schunk, D.H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J.E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory, research and application (pp. 283–301). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313–322. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.313
  • Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1989a). Influence of peer-model attributes on children's beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 431–434. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.431
  • Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1989b). Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 155–163. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.155
  • Seifert, T.L., & O'Keefe, B.A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(Pt 1), 81–92. doi: 10.1348/000709901158406
  • Senko, C., & Miles, K.M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 561–583. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001
  • Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(Pt 3), 343–360. doi: 10.1348/0007099041552314
  • Sins, P.H.M., van Joolingen, W.R., Savelsbergh, E.R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004
  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
  • Vispoel, W.P. (1995). Self-concept in the arts: An extension of the Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 134–153. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.134
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.