Self-directed, genuine graduate attributes: the person-based approach

References

• ACNielsen Research Services. (2000). Employer satisfaction with graduate skills: Research report (Evaluations and Investigations Program Report 99/7). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in close-up research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2008.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of education (pp. 181–193). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2006). Graduate attributes in an age of uncertainty. In P. Hager & S. Holland (Eds.), Graduate attributes, learning and employability (pp. 49–65). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2011). Being a university. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. (2004). A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261–275. doi: 10.1080/0729436042000235391
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. (2005). Rethinking generic graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia News, 27(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S.C. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458. doi: 10.1080/03075070701476100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313–328. doi: 10.1080/0729436042000235427
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, D. (2011). Learning to be – at work. In L. Scanlon (Ed.), “Becoming” a professional (pp. 57–76). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1995). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. (1978). Authenticity and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 12(1), 51–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.1978.tb00503.x
   Google Scholar
• Bortoft, H. (1996). The wholeness of nature: Goethe's way of science. Hudson: Lindisfarne Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1993). Experience as the base for learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 12(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1080/0729436930120104
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. doi: 10.1080/02602930600679050
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K., & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/ATN.grad.cap.project.index.html
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R.E. (2002). Unleashing the power of self-directed learning. In R. Sims (Ed.), Changing the way we manage change: The consultants speak (pp. 13–32). New York: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we've overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1080/07294360802444347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candy, J. (2000). Knowledge navigators and lifelong learners: Producing graduates for the information society. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 261–277. doi: 10.1080/758484346
   Google Scholar
• Candy, P., Crebert, G., & O'Leary, J. (1994) Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education (Report to the NBEET). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 14(2), 155–166. doi: 10.1080/0729436950140202
   Google Scholar
• Dall'Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2007). An ontological turn for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 679–691. doi: 10.1080/03075070701685130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W.M. (2006). An ‘infusion’ approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(2), 179–193. doi: 10.1080/07294360600610420
   Google Scholar
• De la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493–510. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.629361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Harpe, B., & Radloff, A. (2008). Developing graduate attributes for lifelong learning: How far have we got? In D. Orr, P.A. Danaher, G. Danaher, & R.E. Harreveld (Eds.), Lifelong learning: Reflecting on successes and framing futures. Keynote and refereed papers from the 5th International Lifelong Learning Conference (pp. 136–141). Rockhampton: Central Queensland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, I., Nixon, I., & Wiltshire, J. (1998). Personal transferable skills in higher education: The problems of implementing good practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(1), 19–27. doi: 10.1108/09684889810200359
   Google Scholar
• Gardener, J. (2006). Assessment and learning: An introduction. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 1–6). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing up to the challenge: Why is so hard to develop graduate attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1080/07294360802444339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, V., Bell, S., & Kafmann, K. (2010). Thinking strategically about employability and graduate attributes: Universities and enhancing learning for beyond university. Glasgow: QAA Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P. (2005). Current theories of workplace learning: A critical assessment. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 829–846). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Holland, S. (Eds.). (2006). Graduate attributes, learning and employability. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., & Clifford, V. (2011). Integral vision: A multi-perspective approach to the recognition of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 573–584. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.598448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., Moon, V., & Geall, S. (1997). Graduates work: Organisational change and students’ attributes. Birmingham: Centre for Research into Quality (CRQ) and Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR).
   Google Scholar
• Higher Education Council. (1992). Achieving quality. Higher Education Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Barrie, S. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 325–334. doi: 10.1080/02602930903221485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2009a). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. Higher Education, 58(2), 175–191. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9189-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2009b). Redisciplining generic attributes: The disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 85–100. doi: 10.1080/03075070802602018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, M.H., & Drennan, L. (2008). What skills and attributes does an accounting graduate need? Evidence from student perceptions and employer expectations. Accounting & Finance, 48(2), 279–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, P. (2001). Generic skills for the new economy. Adelaide: NCVER.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, L.M.S. (2012). Using an eportfolio to enhance graduate attributes among engineering students in Malaysia. PhD thesis, Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2009). Supporting student learning in the context of diversity, complexity and uncertainty. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The university and its disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries (pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, A., Guild, S., & Struthers, J. (2009). Graduate attributes in the disciplines of medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine: A survey of expert opinions. BMC Medical Education, 9(28). Retrieved January 30, 2013, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6920/9/28
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., & Corrin, L. (2007). Moving toward a university-wide implementation of an ePortfolio tool. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litchfield, A.J., Frawley, J.E., & Nettleton, S.C. (2010). Contextualising and integrating into the curriculum the learning and teaching of work-ready professional graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(5), 519–534. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.502220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowden, K., Hall, S., Elliot, D., & Lewin, J. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the employability of new graduates. London: Edge Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. (2004). The critical thinking debate: how general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000168469
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., & Hough, B. (2005, November). The perils of skills: Towards a model of integrating graduate attributes into the disciplines. Language and Academic Skills in Higher Education Conference, Canberra, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, R. (2009). Recognizing the enhancement of graduate attributes and employability through part-time work while at university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 237–252. doi: 10.1177/1469787409343189
   Google Scholar
• Nicolettou, A., & Martin, E. (1997, July). Developing graduate attributes. Proceedings of the Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), 1997 International Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S., & Tucker, B. (2003). Information literacy for a sustainable career in engineering and technology. In A. Brown (Ed.), Engineering education for a sustainable future: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference for Australasian Association for Engineering Education and 9th Australasian Women in Engineering Forum (pp. 319–326). Melbourne: Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (2001). Implementing career development learning programs. In W. Patton & M. McMahon (Eds.), Career development programs. Preparation for lifelong career decision making (pp. 10–21). Melbourne: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Portnoi, L. (2009). To be or not to be an academic: South African graduate students’ vocational choices. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 406–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, A., de la Harpe, B., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Lawson, A. (2008, November). Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students. Refereed Proceedings of the 2009 ATN Assessment Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, L. (2011). ‘Becoming’ a professional. In L. Scanlon (Ed.), ‘Becoming’ a professional: An interdisciplinary analysis of professional learning (pp. 13–32). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Brooks, S., Lichtenberg, A., McIlveen, P., Torjul, P., & Tyler, J. (2009). Career development learning: Maximising the contribution of work-integrated learning to the student experience. Australian Learning & Teaching Council final project report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J., & Goodfellow, J. (2004). Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: A critical evaluation. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 329–346. doi: 10.1080/0729436042000235436
   Google Scholar
• Tempone, I., Kavanagh, M., Segal, N., Hancock, P., Howieson, B., & Kent, J. (2012). Desirable generic attributes for accounting graduates into the twenty-first century: The views of employers. Accounting Research Journal, 25(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1108/10309611211244519
   Google Scholar
• Tough, A.M. (1979). The adult's learning projects: A fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Treleaven, L., & Voola, R. (2008). Integrating the development of graduate attributes through constructive alignment. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 160–173. doi: 10.1177/0273475308319352
   Google Scholar
• Velde, C. (2009). Employers’ perceptions of graduate outcomes: A case study of a private college in Shanghai. In C.R. Velde (Ed.), International perspectives on competence in the workplace (pp. 101–119). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, A.G. (2006). Career development, learning and employability. York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., & Harvey, L. (2005). Graduate attributes and their development. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005(128), 41–58. doi: 10.1002/ir.162
   Google Scholar