Student engagement research: thinking beyond the mainstream

References

• Báez, C. (2011, July 5–8). Crafting programs to stimulate student engagement and persistence in higher education. Paper presented at the 15th biennial of the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching (ISATT), University of Minho, Braga.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning – a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–26. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. doi: 10.2307/2088165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. (2007). Diversifying curriculum as the practice of repressive tolerance. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5 & 6 special issues), 557–568. doi: 10.1080/13562510701595085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S., & Holst, J. (2011). Radicalizing learning: Adult education for a just world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. doi: 10.1080/14703290701602748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Hardy, C. (2012). The nature of academic engagement: What the students tell us. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 25–46). Oxfordshire: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121–141. doi: 10.1080/02602930600801878
   Google Scholar
• De Santos, M. (2009). Fact-totems and the statistical imagination: The public life of a statistic in Argentina 2001. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 466–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2009). Well-being and happiness: Inquiry into the future for lifelong learning. Thematic Article 4. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. (2006). Leadership, radical student engagement and the necessity of person-centred education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 299–313. doi: 10.1080/13603120600895411
   Google Scholar
• Forgeard, M., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M., & Seligman, M. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, G., & Gruenewald, D. (2004). Expanding the landscape of social justice: A critical ecological analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 47–76. doi: 10.1177/0013161X03259142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagel, P., Carr, R., & Devlin, M. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring student engagement through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE): A critique. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 475–486. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.545870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J., Federico, C., & Napier, J. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions and elected affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, K.-L. (2012). Student engagement: A messy policy challenge in higher education. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 457–474). Oxfordshire: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141(Spring), 5–20. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.v2009:141/issuetoc doi: 10.1002/ir.283
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.F., Cruce, T.M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R.M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. doi: 10.1353/jhe.0.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, E., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. doi:10.3102/0034654313480891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. (2013). Foreword to student engagement: Identity, motivation and community. In C. Nygaard, S. Brand, P. Bartholomew, & L. Millard (Eds.), Student engagement: Identity, motivation and community (pp. xi–xiii). Oxfordshire: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, A. (2009). Toward reflective accountability: Using NSSE for accountability and transparency. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141(Spring), 97–106. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.v2009:141/issuetoc doi: 10.1002/ir.289
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, A., Gonyea, R., & Kinzie, J. (2013). Refreshing engagement: NSSE at 13. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(3), 6–15. doi:10.1080/00091383.2013.786985
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, A. (2010). Elective affinities of the protestant ethic: Weber and the chemistry of capitalism. Sociological Theory, 28(1), 109–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (4th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1076/lpos.3.1.59.27841
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. (2012). The challenges of neoliberalism in education: Implications for student engagement. In B. McMahon & J. Portelli (Eds.), Student engagement in urban schools: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 1–10). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., Seifert, T., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(1), 16–22. doi: 10.1080/00091380903449060
   Google Scholar
• Sanders-Lawson, R., Smith-Campbell, S., & Benham, M. (2006). Wholistic visioning for social justice: Black women theorizing practice. In C. Marshall & M. Oliva (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (pp. 31–61). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. (2012). When students ‘speak back’: Student engagement towards a socially just society. In B. McMahon & J. Portelli (Eds.), Student engagement in urban schools: Beyond neoliberal discourses (pp. 73–90). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Solomonides, I., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2012). A relational model of student engagement. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, and P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 11–24). Oxfordshire: Libri.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, H., Taylor, E., & Cranton, P. (2014). Developing a survey of transformative learning outcomes and processes based on theoretical principles. Journal of Transformative Education, 1–18. doi:10.1177/1541344614540335
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: Final report from the what works project? Student Retention and Success Programme. Paul Hamlyn Foundation, Higher Education Funding Council for England, the Higher Education Academy and Action on Access. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/what-works-student-retention/What_works_summary_report
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1987). The principles of effective retention. Paper presented at the Maryland College Personnel Association Fall Conference, Prince George's Community College, Largo, MD. Retrieved March 8, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED301267.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 51–89). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Retrieved from November 13, 2012, http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/studentengagement/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, J., Vanassche, E., & Wildemeersch, D. (2011). Stories of/on citizenship education: A case of participatory planning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(2), 171–185. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2010.547617
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1993). Keeping faith: Philosophy and race in America. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wimpenny, K., & Savin-Baden, M. (2012). Alienation, agency and authenticity: A synthesis of the literature on student engagement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 311–326. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.725223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education: Questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 697–708. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar