567
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developing evidence for action on the postgraduate experience: an effective local instrument to move beyond benchmarking

, , &
Pages 337-351 | Received 04 Feb 2014, Accepted 19 Jan 2015, Published online: 29 Sep 2015

References

  • Achtemeier, S.D., & Simpson, R.D. (2005). Practical considerations when using benchmarking for accountability in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 30(2), 117–128. doi: 10.1007/s10755-005-5014-3
  • Adams, M.J., & Umbach, P.D. (2012). Nonresponse and online student evaluations of teaching: Understanding the influence of salience, fatigue, and academic environments. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 576–591. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9240-5
  • Borrego, M., Douglas, E.P., & Amelink, C.T. (2009). Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 53–66. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
  • Brogt, E., & Comer, K. (2013). Interpreting differences between the United States and New Zealand university students’ engagement scores as measured by the NCCE and AUSSE. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 713–736. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.693906
  • Canadian Association of Graduate Studies. (2013). Canadian graduate and professional student survey (CGPSS). Retrieved September 12, 2013, from http://www.cags.ca/cgpss/
  • De Vaus, D.A. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
  • Ginns, P., Marsh, H.W., Behnia, M., Cheng, J.H., & Francesca, L.S. (2009). Using postgraduate students’ evaluations of research experience to benchmark departments and faculties: Issues and challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 577–598. doi: 10.1348/978185408X394347
  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2011). The postgraduate research experience 2010. A report on the postgraduate research experience questionnaire. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gca002728.pdf
  • Hicks, O. (1999). Integration of central and departmental development – Reflections from Australian universities. International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1), 43–51. doi: 10.1080/1360144990040107
  • Hodson, L., & Buckley, A. (2011). Postgraduate research experience survey. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/postgraduate/PRES_report_2011.pdf
  • Johnston, L., Brogt, E., Sampson, K.A., & Comer, K. (2015). Enhancing the research student experience: Using data from a formative evaluation survey. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Knight, P.T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275–286. doi: 10.1080/03075070220000662
  • Levy, G.D., & Ronco, S.L. (2012). How benchmarking and higher education came together. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2012(156), 5–13. doi: 10.1002/ir.20026
  • Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D. (2000). Practical meta-analysis (applied social research methods). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lomas, L. (1999). The culture and quality of higher education institutions: Examining the links. Quality Assurance in Education, 7(1), 30–34. doi: 10.1108/09684889910252513
  • Marsh, H.W., Rowe, K.J., & Martin, A. (2002). PhD students’ evaluations of research supervision: Issues, complexities, and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 313–348. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2002.0028
  • McInnis, C., Griffin, P., James, R., & Coates, H. (2001). Development of the course experience questionnaire (CEQ). Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
  • Mok, K.H. (2005). The quest for world class university: Quality assurance and international benchmarking in Hong Kong. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 277–304. doi: 10.1108/09684880510626575
  • Möller, O. (2006). Student satisfaction survey: The Utrecht university approach. Tertiary Education Management, 12(4), 323–328. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2006.9967177
  • New Zealand Deans and Directors of Graduate Studies. (2013, November). Annual Meeting. University of Waikato.
  • Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231
  • Rea, L.M., & Parker, R.A. (2012). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Richardson, J.T.E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193
  • Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2013). Student voice as a contested practice: Power and participation in two student voice projects. Improving Schools, 16(1), 32–46. doi: 10.1177/1365480212469713
  • Rowan, L. (2013). What price success? The impact of the quest for student satisfaction on university academics. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(2), 136–150. doi: 10.5172/ijpl.2013.8.2.136
  • Sampson, K. (2004, October). Report on experience: UC PhD students respond (Unpublished report). Christchurch: University Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of Canterbury.
  • Sampson, K., & Casas Marcé, M. (2012, November). Supporting future directions: UCPEQ 2012 (Unpublished report). Christchurch: Academic Development Group, University of Canterbury.
  • Sampson, K., Comer, K., & Brogt, E. (2011, November). Postgraduate skills training package: Initial recommendations from the PhD tracking project (Unpublished report). Christchurch: Academic Development Group, University of Canterbury.
  • Zhao, H. (2012). Exploring the Canadian graduate and professional student survey (CGPSS): Results from 2007 and 2010 for Ontario universities. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.