A framework for enabling graduate outcomes in undergraduate programmes

References

• Adelman, C., Ewell, P., Gaston, P., & Schneider, C.G. (2011). The degree qualifications profile. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Badcock, P.B.T., Pattison, P.E., & Harris, K. (2010). Developing generic skills through university study: A study of arts, science and engineering in Australia. Higher Education, 60(4), 441–458. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9308-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S.C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates? Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S.C., Hughes, C., & Smith, C. (2009). The national graduate attributes project: Integration and assessment of graduate attributes in curriculum. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313–328. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235427
   Google Scholar
• Bologna Declaration. (1999, June 19). The European higher education area, joint declaration of the European ministers of education, convened in Bologna. Retrieved August 12, 2012, from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/bologna declaration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Dawes, L., Beck, H., Wallace, S., Boman, M., & Reidsema, C. (2009, December 6–9). Graduate attribute mapping with the extended CDIO framework. Paper presented at the 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE) conference, University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• De La Harpe, B., David, C., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Girardi, A. (2009). Understanding academic staff beliefs about graduate attributes. The bfactor project, final report. Strawberry Hills: The Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in a learning society. Summary report to the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from https://bei.leeds.ac.uk/Partners/NCIHE/
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J., & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Final report: Phase 1. Groningen: University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., Holland, S., & Beckett, D. (2002). Enhancing the learning and employability of graduates: The role of generic skills. Melbourne: Business/Higher Education Round Table (B-HERT).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Barrie, S.C. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 325–334. doi:10.1080/02602930903221485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2009). Generic attributes as espoused theory: The importance of context. Higher Education, 58(3), 175–191. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9189-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, B.M. (2010). Quality in European higher education: The influence of the Bologna process. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(3), 40–46. doi:10.1080/00091381003704677
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (2000). Returning to our roots. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. New York: Office of Public Affairs. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from https://studentlife.umich.edu/research/content/returning-our-roots-executive-summaries-reports
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2009). Nurturing generic capabilities through a teaching and learning environment which provides practise in their use. Higher Education, 57(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9131-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: AAC&U, 34 pp.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2011). The New Zealand qualifications framework. Wellington: NZQA. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/studying-in-new-zealand/understand-nz-quals/targeted-review-of-qualifications/
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2013). Targeted review of qualifications. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/studying-in-new-zealand/understand-nz-quals/targeted-review-of-qualifications/
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S., & Sparrow, H. (2002). Developing frameworks to embed graduate attributes in tertiary courses. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Teaching Learning Forum: Focusing on the student. Perth: Edith Cowan University.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.otago.ac.nz/stable/20027998 doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Bath, D. (2006). The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. Higher Education, 51(2), 259–286. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6389-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, D., Riddle, M., & Knewstubb, B. (2012). Curriculum mapping to embed graduate capabilities. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 217–231. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.554387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R. (2013). Towards securing a future for geography graduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(3), 315–326. doi:10.1080/03098265.2013.794334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McLean, A., Frielick, S., Smith, N., Jenkins, M., & Marshall, S. (2013). How to engage with a graduate outcomes agenda: A guide for tertiary education institutions. Wellington: Ako Aotearoa.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McLean, A., Frielick, S., Smith, N., Jenkins, M., & Marshall, S. (2015). Evaluating engagement with graduate outcomes across higher education institutions in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 1014–1030. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1011098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcoxson, L., Wynder, M., & Laing, G.K. (2010). A whole-of-program approach to the development of generic and professional skills in a university accounting program. Accounting Education, 19(1–2), 65–91. doi:10.1080/09639280902886082
   Google Scholar