The paradox of collaboration: a moral continuum

References

• Abramo, C., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57, 155–171. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 437–461. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2003). Academics as intellectuals. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6(4), 108–122. doi: 10.1080/1369823042000241302
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. B. (2008). Academic life: Hospitality, ethics and spirituality. Eugene, OR: Ankler Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T. (1983). Collaboration and the social division of planning. In J. Lishman (Ed.), Collaboration and conflict: Working with others (pp. 10–32). Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295. doi: 10.1007/BF02093625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Corley, C. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human captial. Research Policy, 33, 599–616.
   Google Scholar
• Cady, D. L. (1990). From war to pacifism: A moral continuum. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, P. L., Pololi, L., Knight, S., & Conrad, P. (2009). Collaboration in academic medicine: Reflections on gender and advancement. Academic Medicine, 84(10), 1447–1453. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6ac27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leadership can make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, L. G., Parkes, K. A., Tilley-Lubbs, G. A., Brill, J. M., & Pitts Bannister, V. R. (2009). Navigating the lonely sea: Peer mentoring and collaboration among aspiring women scholars. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1080/13611260802699532
   Google Scholar
• Emmeche, C. (2015). The borderology of friendship in academia. AMITY: The Journal of Friendship Studies, 3(1), 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fiester, A. (2007). Casuistry and the moral continuum: Evaluating animal biotechnology. Politics and the Life Sciences, 25(1–2), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992). Citation data: Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Science and Public Policy, 19(5), 321–327.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Burns, P., & Diment, K. (2005). Common purpose and divided loyalties: The risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers. R and D Management, 35(5), 535–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipp, B. (2013). Citation-based plagiarism detection: Detecting disguised and cross-language plagiarism using citation pattern analysis. Magdeburg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). Impact of collaborative research on academic science. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 65–73. doi: 10.3152/147154300781782147
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., Hamberg, K., & Lundgren, B. (Eds.). (2013). The social politics of research collaboration. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, M., Marquis, B., & Vajoczki, S. (2013). Exploring SoTL through international collaborative writing groups. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(2), 3–8. doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1971, November). Groupthink. Psychology Today, pp. 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jawitz, J. (2009). Learning in the academic workplace: The harmonization of the collective and the individual habitus. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 601–614. doi: 10.1080/03075070802556149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligyte, G., & Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: Leading us into fantasy – The paradoxical resilience of collegiality in academic leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 157–169. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.864613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, L. S. (2005). The white bull effect: Abusive co-authorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 554–556. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1025475423482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbetter, C. (2009). We think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lishman, J. (1983). Editorial. In J. Lishman (Ed.), Collaboration and conflict: Working with others (pp. 7–9). Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46, 422–442. doi: 10.2307/2095262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, L. (2009). Research management and research cultures: Power and productivity. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 66–79). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2007). The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2009). Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic enquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2015). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 171–83. doi: 10.1080/03075070802562857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35. doi: 10.1080/07294360500453053
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973a). The Matthew effect in science (originally published in 1968). In N. W. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 439–459). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973b). The normative structure of science (originally published in 1968). In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, R. (2012). Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The question of authorship. Higher Education Policy, 25(3), 289–311. doi: 10.1057/hep.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. (2008). Towards the virtuous university: The moral bases of academic practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary (OED). (2016). Definition of collaboration in English. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/collaboration. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/grand-challenges
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. N., Vermeulen, N., & Penders, B. (Eds.). (2010). Collaboration in the New Life Sciences. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1994). The myth of the framework: In defense of science and rationality. ( M. A. Notturno, Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Postiglione, G. A. (2013). Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong’s research universities: Network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 345–366. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.773605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambur, B. (2009). Creating collaboration: An exploration of multinational research partnerships. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 80–95). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayre, A. (1975). Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York, NY: Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1958). The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist, 13, 596–599. doi: 10.1037/h0040487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33–38. doi: 10.1177/016555158300600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. (2000). Doing engineering: The career attainment and mobility of Caucasian, Black, and Asian-American engineers. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. (2008). Trust and organizational culture in higher education. In J. Valimaa & O. Yylijoki (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education (pp. 27–41). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tight, M. (2009). The structure of academic research: What can citation studies tell us? In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 54–65). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhly, K. M., Visser, L. M., & Zippel, K. S. (2015). Gendered patterns in international research collaborations in academia. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1072151
   Google Scholar
• University College London. (2016). UCL grand challenges. Retrieved July 19, 2016, from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/grand-challenges
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Besselaar, P., Hemlin, S., & Van Der Weijden, I. (2012). Collaboration and competition in research. Higher Education Policy, 25, 263–266. doi: 10.1057/hep.2012.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasburn, M. H. (2007). Mentoring women faculty: An instrumental case study of strategic collaboration. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(1), 57–72. doi: 10.1080/13611260601037389
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1973). Science as a vocation (originally published in 1919). In E. Shils (Ed. and trans.), Max Weber on universities: The power of the state and the dignity of the academic calling in imperial Germany (pp. 54–62). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar