1,731
Views
50
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Fear and loathing in the academy? The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia

, &
Pages 555-568 | Received 07 Aug 2016, Accepted 03 Nov 2016, Published online: 08 Mar 2017

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2003). The politics of fear in the making of worlds. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(3), 377–398. doi: 10.1080/0951839032000086745
  • Beard, C., Clegg, S., & Smith, K. (2007). Acknowledging the affective in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 235–252. doi: 10.1080/01411920701208415
  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.
  • Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
  • Bhattacharya, A. (2012). Science funding: Duel to the death. Nature, 488, 20–22. doi: 10.1038/488020a
  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
  • Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. London: Routledge.
  • Braben, D., Allen, J. F., Amos, W., Ashburner, M., Ashmore, J., Birkhead, T., & Woodruff, P. (2009). Only scholarly freedom delivers real ‘impact’ 1: An open letter to Research Councils UK. Times Higher Education. Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=408984
  • Chubb, J., & Watermeyer, R. (2016). Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1144182
  • Collini, S. (2011). Research must not be tied to politics. The Guardian. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/01/research-arts-and-humanities-research-council
  • Cupples, J., & Pawson, E. (2012). Giving an account of oneself: The PBRF and the neoliberal university. New Zealand Geographer, 68(1), 14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2012.01217.x
  • Cuthill, M., O’Shea, E., Wilson, B., & Viljoen, P. (2014). Universities and the public good: A review of knowledge exchange policy and related university practice in Australia. Australian Universities’ Review, 56(2), 36–46.
  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Delanty, G. (2008). Academic identities and institutional change. In R. Barnett & R. di Napoli (Eds.), Changing identities in higher education: Voicing perspectives (pp. 124–133). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Donovan, C. (2008). The Australian research quality framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental and cultural returns of publicly funded research. New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 47–60. doi: 10.1002/ev.260
  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  • Evans, M. (2004). Killing thinking: The death of the universities. London: Continuum.
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
  • Giroux, H. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
  • Gornall, J., Cook, C., Daunton, L., Salisbury, J., & Thomas, B. (Eds.). (2013). Academic working lives: Experience, practice and change. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Hammersley, M. (2016). Can academic freedom be justified? Reflections on the arguments of robert post and stanley fish. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(2), 108–126. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12086
  • Harris, S. (2005). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 421–433. doi: 10.1080/13562510500238986
  • Henkel, M. (2007). Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A perspective from Britain. Higher Education, 26(1), 87–99.
  • Hey, V., & Leathwood, C. (2009). Passionate attachments: Higher education, policy, knowledge, emotion and social justice. Higher Education Policy, 22, 101–118. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.34
  • Holmwood, J. (2011). The idea of a public university. In J. Holmwood (Ed.), A manifesto for the public university (pp. 56–73). London: Bloomsbury.
  • Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2012). Final report: Assessing the impact of developments in research policy for research on higher education: An exploratory study. Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE). Retrieved March 3, 2015, from https://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/Leathwood_Read_Final_Report_16_July_2012.pdf
  • Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Learning and teaching in higher education: The reflective professional. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, B. R. (2011). The research excellence framework and the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
  • Naidoo, R. (2016). Higher Education Worldviews Competition Annual Lecture. Retrieved August 6, 2016, from http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/news_events/news/2016/25-04-rajani-naidoo-higher-education-competition-worldviews-annual-lecture.html
  • Nguyen, V. (2015). Mẹ-search, hauntings, and critical distance. Life Writing, 12(4), 467–477. doi: 10.1080/14484528.2014.915285
  • O’Shea, É. (2014). Embedding knowledge exchange within Irish universities – International shifts towards a hybrid academic? The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 6(1), 1391–1396.
  • Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (2014). Reshaping the university: The rise of the regulated market in higher education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • RCUK. (2011). RCUK impact requirements, p. 2. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUKprod/assets/documents/impacts/RCUKImpactFAQ.pdf
  • REF. (2012). Assessment framework and guidance on submissions. London: HEFCE ( Updated).
  • Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2015). Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014: Table 1. Research Evaluation, 24, 229–241. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv007
  • Smith, K. (2012). Fools, facilitators and flexians: Academic identities in marketised environments. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(2), 155–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2012.00513.x
  • Sparkes, A. C. (2007). Embodiment, academics and the audit culture: A story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 521–550. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082306
  • Watermeyer, R. (2012). From engagement to impact? Articulating the public value of academic research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2011.641578
  • Watermeyer, R., & Olssen, M. (2016). ‘Excellence’ and exclusion: The individual costs of competitiveness. Minerva, 54(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5
  • Whitchurch, C. (2012). Expanding the parameters of academia. Higher Education, 64(1), 99–117. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9483-2
  • Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121–131. doi: 10.1080/13600800902825835

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.