The implied PhD student of interdisciplinary research projects within monodisciplinary structures

References

• Acker, S., & Haque, E. (2015). The struggle to make sense of doctoral study. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 229–241. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.956699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, S., & Webber, M. (2017). Made to measure: Early career academics in the Canadian university workplace. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 541–554. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1288704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriansen, H. K. (2012). Timeline interviews: A tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies, 3(1), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Amran, N. N., & Ibrahim, R. (2012). Academic rites of passage: Reflection on a PhD journey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 528–534. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.310
   Google Scholar
• Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807–827. doi: 10.1080/03075070903501887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., & Wouters, P. (2007). Not another case study – A middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of E-science. Science Technology & Human Values, 32, 672–692. doi: 10.1177/0162243907306188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education; Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, K. L., & Nesbitt, K. V. (2008). Identifying risks for cross-disciplinary higher degree research students.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism – Perspective and method. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bologna Working Group. (2005). A framework for qualifications of the European higher education area. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Retrieved from http://ecahe.eu/w/index.php/Framework_for_Qualifications_of_the_European_Higher_Education_Area#Third_cycle_-_PhD
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the fifth framework programme. Futures, 36(4), 457–470. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callard, F., & Fitzgerald, D. (2015). Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the social sciences and neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., Maisto, S. A., & Henson, J. M. (2004). Temporal stability of the timeline followback interview for alcohol and drug use with psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65(6), 774–781. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, J. (2011). Evaluation of the National Science Foundation’s integrative graduate education and research traineeship program (IGERT): Follow-up Study of IGERT Graduates. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.igert.org/system/content_item_assets/files/1535/ES_IGERT_FOLLOWUP_STUDY_FULLREPORT_May_2011.pdf?1340382040
   Google Scholar
• Devenish, R., Dyer, S., Jefferson, T., Lord, L., van Leeuwen, S., & Fazakerley, V. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 59–70. doi: 10.1080/07294360802444362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durette, B., Fournier, M., & Lafon, M. (2016). The core competencies of PhDs. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1355–1370. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.968540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2013). Growing into what? The (un-)disciplined socialisation of early stage researchers in transdisciplinary research. Higher Education, 65(4), 511–524. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9560-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138. doi: 10.1007/s10755-008-9068-x
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383–406. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K., Jansujwicz, J. S., Hutchins, K., Cline, B., & Levesque, V. (2014). Socialization to interdisciplinarity: Faculty and student perspectives. Higher Education, 67(3), 255–271. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9648-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, L., & Melin, G. (2016). Stronger disciplinary identities in multidisciplinary research schools. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(1), 16–28. doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2014.1000848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. (1999). The challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research in traditional doctoral programs. Ecosystems, 2(4), 281–285. doi: 10.1007/s100219900076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, I. (2001). The story of life history: Origins of the life history method in sociology. Identity, 1(2), 129–142. doi: 10.1207/S1532706XID0102_02
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. (1997). Disciplining students: The construction of student subjectivities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 101–114. doi: 10.1080/0142569970180106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C., Green, I., & Bastalich, W. (2011). Big love: Managing a team of research supervisors. UPM Press. Retrieved from https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/71641
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J., & Rhoten, D. R. (2011). Engaged, embedded, enjoined: Science and technology studies in the national science foundation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 823–838. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, K. A. (2018). The longitudinal career experiences of interdisciplinary neuroscience PhD recipients. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(1), 106–127. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2017.1341755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, F. J. (2016). The idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first-century imagination. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llamas, J. M. C. (2006). Technologies of disciplinary power in action: The norm of the ‘good student’. Higher Education, 52(4), 665–686. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-1449-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., Bruce, A., Tait, J., & Meagher, L. (2011). Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies for capturing creativity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., & Meagher, L. R. (2012). A masterclass in interdisciplinarity: Research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures, 44(6), 608–617. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2006a). ‘A demented form of the familiar’: Postmodernism and educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 223–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2006b). Entertaining doubts: On frivolity as resistance. In J. Satterthwaite, W. Martin, & L. Roberts (Eds.), Discourse, resistance and identity formation (pp. 1–15). London: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277–286. doi: 10.1080/02680930903462316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansilla, V. B. (2006). Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 17–29. doi: 10.3152/147154406781776075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Åkerlind, G. (2010). Becoming an academic. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Melin, G., & Janson, K. (2006). What skills and knowledge should a PhD have? Changing preconditions for PhD education and post doc work. Wenner Gren International Series, 83, 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K., Lowenthal, M. F., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. New York: Free Pree; London: Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Heggelund, M. (2008). Toward a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. University of Washington Press. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/book/11362
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2007). Redefining the doctorate [Monograph]. Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/435/
   Google Scholar
• Poole, B. (2015). The rather elusive concept of ‘doctorateness’: A reaction to Wellington. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1507–1522. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.873026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Bennett, G. (2012). Designing human practices: An experiment with synthetic biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2017). Interdisciplinary research process and theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Education: Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306, 2046–2046. doi: 10.1126/science.1103628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36, 56–75. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70–86. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway, D. R., & Messer-Davidow, E. (1991). Disciplinarity: An introduction. Poetics Today, 12(2), 201–225. doi: 10.2307/1772850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammi, T. (2009). The competitive funding of university research: The case of Finnish science universities. Higher Education, 57(5), 657–679. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9169-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, T., Pisapia, J., & Razzaq, J. (2015). Fostering interdisciplinary research in universities: A case study of leadership, alignment and support. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 658–675. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 305–316. doi: 10.1080/14703290903069027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. (2009). Danish qualifications framework for higher education. Retrieved from http://ufm.dk/en/education-and-institutions/recognition-and-transparency/transparency-tools/qualifications-frameworks/other-qualifications-frameworks/danish-qf-for-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Ulriksen, L. (2009). The implied student. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 517–532. doi: 10.1080/03075070802597135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Copenhagen. (2014). General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen. University of Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://phd.ku.dk/english/regulations/General_rules_and_guidelines_for_the_PhD_programme_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Copenhagen, Research and Innovation. (2012, June 20). UCPH 2016 – Funds call. University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2013). Searching for ‘doctorateness’. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1490–1503. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.634901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K. J. (2017). Does external funding push doctoral supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357–376. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0052-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winchester-Seeto, T., Homewood, J., Thogersen, J., Jacenyik-Trawoger, C., Manathunga, C., Reid, A., & Holbrook, A. (2014). Doctoral supervision in a cross-cultural context: Issues affecting supervisors and candidates. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 610–626. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.841648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar