Affect and ipsative approaches as a counter to pedagogic frailty: the guardian of traditional models of student success

References

• Astin, A. W. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W., & Antonio, A. L. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield/ACE.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2011). The marketised university: Defending the indefensible. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 39–51). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 215–241. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: NFER/Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). ‘In praise of educational research’: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000133721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr. S. (2011). Mark my words: the role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices, Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670, doi: 10.1080/03075071003777716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K., & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates. Retrieved from http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/ ATN.grad.cap.project.index.html
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, F. B., & Cvengros, J. A. (2004). Distinguishing hope and optimism: Two sides of a coin, or two separate coins? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 273–302. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.2.273.31018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterwick, S., & Benjamin, A. (2006). The road to employability through personal development: A critical analysis of the silences and ambiguities of the British Columbia (Canada) life skills curriculum. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 75–86. doi: 10.1080/02601370500309543
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(7), 953–962. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199811)54:7<953::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., Hudson, A., & Steel, J. (2010). The emperor’s new clothes: Globalisation and E-learning in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1080/01425690301914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2006). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and emotional capital: An exploration into learning about others. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 134–147). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cozolino, L. (2014). Attachment-Based teaching: Creating a tribal classroom. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, O. B., Feldman, D. B., & Margalit, M. (2012). A focused intervention for 1st-year college students: Promoting hope, sense of coherence, and self-efficacy. The Journal of Psychology, 146(3), 333–352. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.634862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, L., Hanson, K., Maltby, J., Proctor, C., & Wood, A. (2010). Hope uniquely predicts objective academic achievement above intelligence, personality, and previous academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 550–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M., & Korgen, K. (2002). “Weֹ’re the customer – we pay the tuition”: Student consumerism among undergraduate sociology majors. Teaching Sociology, 30(1), 100–107. doi: 10.2307/3211524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, L., & Johnston, B. (2002). Assessment in universities: A critical review of research. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Findlow, S. (2008). Accountability and innovation in higher education: A disabling tension? Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 313–329. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furedi, F. (2011). Introduction to the marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 1–8). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2006). Why assessment is changing. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 11–22). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology: Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2011). Aiming for personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 353–367. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (2014). Ipsative assessment. Motivation through marking progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. (Ed.). (2017). Ipsative assessment and personal learning gain: Exploring international case studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G., Wood, E., & Kitagawa, K. (2014). Use of self referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 33–43. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2014.921612
   Google Scholar
• Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2003). The uses of learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(3), 357–368. doi: 10.1080/13562510309399
   Google Scholar
• Ingleby, E. (2013). Teaching policy and practice: Early years, neoliberalism and communities of practice. Contemporary Social Science, 8(2), 120–129. doi:10. 1080/21582041.2012.751505 doi: 10.1080/21582041.2012.751505
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. (2000). Programme specification and its role in promoting an outcomes model of learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1(2), 132–151. doi: 10.1177/1469787400001002004
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1177/1742715011433525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, T., Bickel, R., & Birtwistle, T. (2006). Criticizing the image of the student as consumer: Examining legal trends and administrative responses in the US and UK. Education and the Law, 18(2–3), 85–129. doi: 10.1080/09539960600919779
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2015). Pedagogic frailty: An initial consideration of aetiology and prognosis. Society for Research in Higher Education conference papers, Newport. Wales. Retrieved from https://www.srhe.ac.uk/conference20l5/abstracts/0026.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2016a). Visualising powerful knowledge to develop the expert student: A knowledge structures perspective on teaching and learning at university. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2016b, September 5–9). The mapping of pedagogic frailty: A concept in which connectedness is everything. In A. Cañas, P. Reiska, & J. Novak (Eds.), Innovating with concept mapping: Proceedings of 7th international conference on concept mapping, CMC 2016, Tallinn, Estonia (pp. 229–240). Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2017). Mapping the terrain of pedagogic frailty. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (Eds.). (2017). Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Klemenčič, M. (2011). The public role of higher education and student participation in higher education governance. In J. Brennan & T. Shah (Eds.), Higher education and society in changing times: Looking back and looking forward (pp. 74–83). London: CHERI.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities, authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 35(2), 171–194. doi: 10.1080/03075070902953048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R. (2017). Enhancing quality to address frailty. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 179–194). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (2003). Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson, K., & Roxå, T. (2016). Working with networks, microcultures and communities. In D. Baume & C. Popovic (Eds.), Advancing practice in academic development (pp. 174–187). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 353–370. doi: 10.1080/03054980902934639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. doi: 10.1080/13562510902898841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, C., & Dunstan, J. (2013). A response to neoliberal challenges to field education. Social Work Education, 32(2), 141–156. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2012.730141
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering participants or corroding learning? Towards a research agenda on the impact of student consumerism in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 267–381. doi: 10.1080/02680930500108585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., & Williams, J. (2015). The neoliberal regime in English higher education: Charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 208–223. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2014.939098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nota, L., Soresi, S., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 198–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2005.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. (2016). Neoliberal competition in higher education today: Research, accountability and impact. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 129–148. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2015.1100530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlina, W., & Drake, R. L. (2016). Authentic learning in anatomy: A primer on pragmatism. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(1), 5–7. doi: 10.1002/ase.1592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33–47). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (2008). Beyond understanding. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479–492. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. doi: 10.1080/02602930903541007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. (2006). Improving performance through enhancing student understanding of criteria and feedback. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 100–109). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, J. (2016). Affective dimensions of liminality. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & M. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice (pp. 67–76). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, J. (2017). Assessing liminality: The use of ipsative formative assessment during a postgraduate taught induction programme to support the development of criticality. In G. Hughes (Ed.), Ipsative assessment and personal learning gain: Exploring international case studies (pp. 149–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, J.-A. (2012). The role obligations of learners and lecturers in higher education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(1), 14–28. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-9752.2011.00834.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00834.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M. (2006). The promotion of resilience in the face of adversity. In A. Clarke-Stewart & J. Dunn (Eds.), Families count: Effects on child and adolescent development (pp. 26–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–94. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000264262
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. B. (2010). Neoliberal ideology and public education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 42–77.
   Google Scholar
• Scullion, R., Molesworth, M., & Nixon, E. (2011). Arguments, responsibility and what is to be done about marketisation. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer (pp. 227–236). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 293–311. doi: 10.1080/03054980902934563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd, J. W. (1997). Relevance and responsibility: A postmodern response. Response to “A postmodern explanation of student consumerism in higher education”. Teaching Sociology, 25(4), 333–335. doi: 10.2307/1319303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., Lopez, S. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Little, T. D., & Pressgrove, C. L. (2006). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 37–52. doi: 10.1080/17439760500373174
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams, V. H., III, & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching. The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. doi: 10.3102/0034654313496870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2013). Consuming higher education. Why learning can’t be bought. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., Greenleaf, A. T., Albert, T., & Barnes, E. F. (2014). Promoting educational resilience among African American students at risk of school failure: The role of school counselors. Journal of School Counseling, 12(9), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E. (2017). The ‘3 Rs’ of pedagogic frailty; risk, reward and resilience. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 33–48). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48–67. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.648373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar