615
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The north and the south of it: academic governance in the US, England and Australia

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1501-1514 | Received 03 Mar 2018, Accepted 31 May 2018, Published online: 18 Jul 2018

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (1987). Higher education in the third world: Themes and variation. New Delhi: Sangam Books.
  • Atlas, S. F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613. doi: 10.1177/00113921030516003
  • Baird, J. (2007). Taking it on board: Quality audit findings for higher education governance. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 101–115. doi: 10.1080/07294360601166844
  • Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Models of university governance: Bureaucratic, collegial, and political. Stanford, CA: Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching, Stanford University.
  • Blackmore, J. (2014). Cultural and gender politics in Australian education, the rise of edu-capitalism and the ‘fragile project’ of critical educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(5), 499–520. doi: 10.1007/s13384-014-0158-8
  • Blackmore, J., Brennan, M., & Zipin, L. (eds.). (2010). Repositioning university governance and academic work. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Boggs, A. M. (2010). Understanding the origins, evolution and state of play in UK university governance. In S. Miller (Ed.), The new collection (vol. 5, pp. 1–8). Oxford: New College.
  • Cantwell, B. (2016). The geopolitics of the education market. In E. Hazelkorn (Ed.), Global rankings and the geopolitics of higher education. Understanding the influence and impact of rankings on higher education, policy and society (pp. 309–323). London: Routledge.
  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Collyer, F. (2013). The production of scholarly knowledge in the global market arena: University ranking systems, prestige and power. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 245–259. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.788049
  • Collyer, F. (2014). Sociology, sociologists and core-periphery relations. Journal of Sociology, 50(3), 252–268. doi: 10.1177/1440783312448687
  • Connell, R. (2006). Northern theory: The political geography of general social theory. Theory and Society, 35(2), 237–264. doi: 10.1007/s11186-006-9004-y
  • Connell, R. (2007a). The northern theory of globalization. Sociological Theory, 25(4), 368–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00314.x
  • Connell, R. (2007b). Southern theory. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Connell, R. (2014). Under southern skies. Decentering Social Theory, 25, 173–182. doi: 10.1108/S0198-8719(2013)0000025015
  • Connell, R. (2015). Meeting at the edge of fear: Theory on a world scale. Feminist Theory, 16(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1177/1464700114562531
  • Connell, R. (2016). What are good universities? Australian Universities Review, 58(2), 67–73.
  • Connell, R. (2017). Southern theory and world universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 4–15. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1252311
  • Davis, G. (2017). The Australian idea of a university. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
  • Dill, D. (2014). Academic governance in the US: Implications of a ‘commons’ perspective. In M. Shattock (Ed.), International trends in university governance: Autonomy, self-government and the distribution of authority (pp. 165–183). London: Routledge.
  • Forsyth, H. (2014). A history of the modern Australian university. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
  • Gale, T. (2012). Towards a southern theory of student equity in Australian higher education: Enlarging the rationale for expansion. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(3), 238–262.
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2017). Rankings and higher education: Reframing relationships within and between states. ICL Institute of Education, London. Retrieved from http://www.researchcghe.org/publications/rankings-and-higher-education-reframing-relationships-within-and-between-states/
  • Hickling-Hudson, A. (2009). Southern theory and its dynamics for postcolonial education. In R. S. Coloma (Ed.), Postcolonial challenges in education (pp. 365–377). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Hountondji, P. J. (1997). Endogenous knowledge: Research trails. Dakar, Senegal: Codesria.
  • Jolly, M. (2008). The south in southern theory: Antipodean reflections on the Pacific. Australian Humanities Review, 44, 1–18.
  • Juntrasook, A., & Burford, J. (2017). Animating southern theory in the context of Thai higher education: A response from Thailand. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 21–27. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1249069
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lo, W. (2011). Soft power, university rankings and knowledge production: Distinctions between hegemony and self-determination in higher education. Comparative Education, 47(2), 209–222. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2011.554092
  • Manathunga, C., & Grant, B. (2017). Editorial: Southern theories and higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1252305
  • Marginson, S. (2008). Global field and global imagining: Bourdieu and worldwide higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 303–315. doi: 10.1080/01425690801966386
  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  • McFarlane, C. (2006). Crossing borders: Development, learning and the north–south divide. Third World Quarterly, 27(8), 1413–1437. doi: 10.1080/01436590601027271
  • McNay, I. (1995). From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: The changing cultures of universities. In T. Schuller (Ed.), The changing university? (pp. 105–115). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing internal governance: Are leadership roles and management structures in United Kingdom universities fit for the future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 275–294. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12018
  • Moodie, G. (2004). The neglected role of a neglected body: Academic boards’ role in assuring equivalent standards. Australian Universities Review, 47(1), 35–41.
  • Ngo, M. T. (2014). A quest for a new model of public university governance that promotes incentives for academic excellence for modern Vietnam: Lessons from multi-site comparative case studies in East Asia (PhD thesis). University of New South Wales.
  • Ray, R. (2014). Connell and postcolonial sociology. Decentering Social Theory, 25, 147–156. doi: 10.1108/S0198-8719(2013)0000025013
  • Rowlands, J. (2013). The symbolic role of academic boards in university academic quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), 142–157. doi: 10.1080/13538322.2013.802574
  • Rowlands, J. (2017a). Academic governance within contemporary universities: Perspectives from anglophone nations. Singapore: Springer Nature.
  • Rowlands, J. (2017b). The domestic labour of academic governance and the loss of academic voice. Gender and Education, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2017.1324132
  • Rüegg, W. (1992). Themes. In H. De Ridder-Symoens (Ed.), A history of the university in Europe (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sadler, M. (1964). How far can we learn anything of practical value from the study of foreign systems of education? Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314. doi: 10.1086/445012
  • Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Tierney, W. G., & Minor, J. T. (2003). Challenges for governance: A national report. Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
  • van Vught, F. A. (1993). Patterns of governance in higher education concepts and trends: A study conducted by Frans Van Vught center for higher education policy studies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  • Vilkinas, T., & Peters, M. (2014). Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 36(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.825419

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.