Threats to student evaluative judgement and their management

References

• Abercrombie, M. L. J. (1960/1989). The anatomy of judgement: An investigation into the processes of perception and reasoning. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 319–334). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., & Hammond, K. R. (Eds.). (1986). Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/713695728
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 14–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.769198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R. (2014). Self-assessment in professional programmes within tertiary institutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 908–918. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.934353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R. (2018). Self-assessment to incite learning in higher education: Developing ontological awareness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 827–839. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1411881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, V. (2012). Marking as judgment. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 63–80. doi: 10.1080/02671520903331008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444–457. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 2(1), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, L., & O’Connell, A. (2006). A brief history of decision making. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 113–122). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. B. (2004). The psychology of medical decision making. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 585–603). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. (2010). Developing the ability for making evaluative judgements. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 323–334. doi: 10.1080/13562510903560036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosskerry, P., Singhal, G., & Mamede, S. (2013). Cognitive debiasing 1: Origins of bias and theory of debiasing. British Medical Journal of Quality and Safety, 22, ii58–ii64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual process and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2014). From ‘economic man’ to behavioural economics. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 78–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction – heuristics and biases: Then and now. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Butler, J. (1996). Two models of educational assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(4), 367–378.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. doi: 10.1037/a0016755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren, G., & Teigen, K. H. (2004). Yet another look at the heuristics and biases approach. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 89–109). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Keren, G., & Wu, G. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrick, R. P. (2004). Debiasing. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 316–337). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lovallo, D., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Delusions of success: How optimism undermines executives’ decisions. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding. London: Alan Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The ‘IKEA effect’: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 453–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 988–1010. doi: 10.3758/BF03196730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. (2004). Rationality and the normative/descriptive distinction. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 3–18). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. K., Klein, G., & Sieck, W. R. (2004). Expertise in judgment and decision making: A case for training intuitive decision skills. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 297–315). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1981). Intuitive data processing as a potential source of bias in naturalistic evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(4), 25–31. doi: 10.3102/01623737003004025
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2009). Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 45–64). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saks, M. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1986). Human information processing and adjudication: Trial by heuristics. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making (pp. 213–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as a process and product of thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Payne, J. W. (2015a). Outsmart your own biases. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Payne, J. W. (2015b). A user’s guide to debiasing. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 924–951). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Soman, D. (2004). Framing, loss aversion, and mental accounting. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 379–398). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. (Ed.). (2010). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Pandero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J. H., Canny, B. J., Haines, T. P., & Molloy, E. K. (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: Opportunities in clinical medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21, 659–676. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (2015). Misbehaving: How economics became behavioural. London: Alan Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1675–1715. doi: 10.1086/597179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar