Joining the research conversation: threshold concepts embedded in the literature review

References

• Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Researching writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P., Ewing, R., & Hoban, G. (2009). Action learning in schools: Reframing teachers’ professional learning and development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework (2nd ed.). Adelaide: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans. and C. Emerson & M. Holmquist, Eds.). Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2015). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, M. (2011). Problematising short-term participant observation and multi-method ethnographic studies. Ethnography and Education, 6(2), 229–243. doi: 10.1080/17457823.2011.587361
   Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, C. (2014). The gift of writing groups: Critique, community and confidence. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 128–141). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, M. (2011). Writing into the knowledge society: A case of vulnerability in inkshedding. In D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Paré, N. Artemeva, M. Horne, & L. Yousoubova (Eds.), Writing in the knowledge society (pp. 237–256). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thompson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08327390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thompson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, J. (2015). Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threshold and how supervisors can use it. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 17–28. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 293–304. doi: 10.1080/14703290903069001
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2017). An emerging PhD curriculum and what this might mean for doctoral level threshold concepts. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 294–312.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431–441. doi: 10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & C. Aitchison. (2009). Writing for the doctorate and beyond. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 87–99). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. Y., & Vandermensbrugge, J. (2011). Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an on-going writing group. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 195–205. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2011.564014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantai, L. (2015). Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Land, R. (Eds.) (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicola-Richmond, K., Pépin, G., Larkin, H., & Taylor, C. (2018). Threshold concepts in higher education: A synthesis of the literature relating to measurement of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 101–114. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1339181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2017). Reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión [Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision]. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 40(3), 407–428. doi: 10.1080/02103702.2017.1341102
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. (2015). Developing doctoral authors: Engaging with theoretical perspectives through literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 64–74. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2014.981841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward-Kron, R. (2007). Negotiating meanings and scaffolding learning: Writing support for non-English speaking background postgraduate students. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(3), 253–268. doi: 10.1080/07294360701494286
   Google Scholar