Informed learning design: teaching and learning through engagement with information

References

• Åkerlind, G. S., McKenzie, J. A., & Lupton, M. (2011). A threshold concepts focus to curriculum design: Supporting student learning through application of variation theory (Final Report). Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/PP8_885_Final_Report_Akerlind_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S., McKenzie, J. A., & Lupton, M. (2014). The potential of combining phenomenography, variation theory and threshold concepts to inform curriculum design in higher education. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research II (pp. 227–247). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Andretta, S. (2012). Ways of experiencing information literacy: Making the case for a relational approach. Oxford: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/263461/2/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., King, F. J., & Hannum, W. H. (1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development (5 vols.) (No. TRADOC Pam 350-30 NAVEDTRA 106A; NTIS No. ADA 019 486 through ADA 019 490). Ft. Monroe, VT: Army Training and Doctrine Command.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. S. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, C. S. (2008). Informed learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. L. (2006). Panning for gold: Information literacy and the net lenses model. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, M. (2017). The “workplace experience framework” and evidence-based information literacy education. In M. Forster (Ed.), Information literacy in the workplace (pp. 149–164). London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J. (2012). Learning curve: How college graduates solve information problems once they join the workplace (Project Information Literacy Research Report). Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. (2010). Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age (Project Information Literacy Research Report). University of Washington’s Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/publications/
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H. (2012). Informed cyber learning: A case study. In P. Godwin & J. Parker (Eds.), Information literacy beyond library 2.0 (pp. 138–150). London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H., & Bruce, C. S. (2012a). Informed learning in online environments: Supporting the higher education curriculum beyond Web 2.0. In P. Godwin & J. Parker (Eds.), Information literacy beyond library 2.0 (pp. 65–79). London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H., & Bruce, C. S. (2012b). Snapshots of informed learning: LIS and beyond. Education for Information, 29, 253–269. doi: 10.3233/EFI-130940
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, H., Bruce, C. S., & Edwards, S. L. (2007). Models for reflection and learning: A culturally inclusive response to the information literacy imbalance. In S. Andretta (Ed.), Change and challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century (pp. 59–84). Adelaide: Auslib Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Mårtensson, P., & Runesson, U. (2016). What is to be learned? Teachers’ collective inquiry into the object of learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 309–322. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1119725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2000, April). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Paper presented at the Special Interest Group on Research in Mathematics Education American Educational Research Association Meeting, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Limberg, L. (2000). Is there a relationship between information seeking and learning outcomes? In C. S. Bruce, P. C. Candy, & H. Klaus (Eds.), Information literacy around the world: Advances in programs and research (pp. 193–207). Wagga Wagga, N.S.W: Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., Marton, F., Pang, M. F., & Pong, W. Y. (2004). Toward a pedagogy of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. M. P. (2005). For each and everyone: Catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, M. (2004). The learning connection: Information literacy and the student experience. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, M. (2008). Information literacy and learning. Blackwood: Auslib Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2014). Necessary conditions for learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (1999, August). Two faces of variation. Paper presented at the 8th European Association for Research for Learning and Instruction (EARLI) conference, Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variato est mater studorum. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(3), 381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Maybee, C. (2018). Impact learning: Librarians at the forefront of change in higher education. Oxford: Chandos.
   Google Scholar
• Maybee, C., Bruce, C. S., Lupton, M., & Rebmann, K. R. (2017). Designing rich information experiences to shape learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 42(17), 2373–2388. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1148684
   Google Scholar
• Micari, M., Light, G., Calkins, S., & Streitwieser, B. (2007). Assessment beyond performance: Phenomenography in educational evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(4), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007308024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, G., & Martin, E. (2013). Blooming, SOLO taxonomy, and phenomenography as assessment strategies in undergraduate science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(2), 78. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst13_043_02_78
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Ki, W. W. (2016). Revisiting the idea of “critical aspects.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 323–336. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2015.1119724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., Linder, C., & Fraser, D. (2006). Beyond lesson studies and design experiments: Using theoretical tools in practice and finding out how they work. International Review of Economics Education, 5(1), 28–45. doi: 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30126-2
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond “lesson study”: Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31(3), 175–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1023280619632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2017). Chinese lesson study, Learning study and keys to learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 336–347. doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-01-2017-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pong, W. Y., & Morris, P. (2002). Accounting for differences in achievement. In F. Marton & P. Morris (Eds.), What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 301–318). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Smeaton, K., Maybee, C., Bruce, C. S., & Hughes, H. (2016). Expanding literacy and informed learning boundaries with Manga. ACCESS, 30(1), 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, S., Boon, S., & Johnston, B. (2005). A comparison of UK academics’ conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and marketing. Library and Information Research, 29(93), 4–15. doi: 10.29173/lirg197
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar