A general framework for cultivating innovations in higher education curriculum

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. doi: 10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anakin, M., Spronken-Smith, R., Healey, M., & Vajoczki, S. (2017). The contextual nature of university-wide curriculum change. International Journal for Academic Development, doi: 10.1080.1360144X.2017.1385464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajada, C. (2010, May, 17). Graduate attributes in the business school – bachelor of business review. Unpublished internal document, University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C., Spronken-Smith, R., McLean, A., Smith, N., Frielick, S., Jenkins, M., & Marshall, S. (2017). A framework for enabling graduate outcomes in undergraduate programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 43–58. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1170767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Carew, A., & Cooper, P. (2008). Engineering curriculum review: Processes, frameworks and tools. Proceedings of the annual SEFI conference, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., & Cooke-Davies, T. (2012). Best industry outcomes. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• de la Harpe, B., & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum change in universities. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 75–85. doi: 10.1177/097340820900300115
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), Article 7. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_1/html/fereday.htm doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster, G. (1995). Design of university courses and subjects: A strategic approach. HERDSA Green Guide 15. Sydney: HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 269–284. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: Learning to do what matters the most. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, E., & King, R. (2011). Curriculum specification and support systems for engineering education that address revised qualification standards.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: Different perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M. (1990). Curriculum: Project management for educational administrators. Ashgrove, QLD: Australian Council for Educational Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., & Oliver, B. (2008). 360-degree feedback on courses: Needs analysis for comprehensive course review. Paper presented at the Australian universities quality forum, Canberra. Retrieved from http://auqa.edu.au/auqf/2008/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Kirkup, L. (2009). Forging new directions in physics education in Australian universities. Sydney: Office of Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, M. S., Beasley, D., Scales, K., & Elzinger, D. (1998). Planning for curriculum renewal and accreditation under ABET engineering criteria 2000. ASEE annual conference and exposition. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/ASEE/conferences/annual/1998highlights.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Lyneis, J. M., & Ford, D. N. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management. System Dynamics Review, 23(2/3), 157–189.
   Google Scholar
• Mailhot, C., & St-Jean, M. (2002). Review process for an entry-level degree program in pharmacy: A successful approach. Pharmacy Education: An International Journal for Pharmaceutical Education, 2(3), 117–127. doi: 10.1080/1560221021000040736
   Google Scholar
• Peach, D., Cates, C., Jones, J., Lechleiter, H., & Ilg, B. (2011). Responding to rapid change in higher education: Enabling university departments responsible for work related programs through boundary spanning. Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, 45(1), 94–106. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46451/
   Google Scholar
• Slade, D. (2011). Communication for health in emergency contexts. Sydney: Office of Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, J. (2002). A process for curriculum change in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 133–148. doi: 10.1080/03043790210129603
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., & Jordan, E. (2008). Top management support: Mantra or necessity? International Journal of Project Management, 26, 713–725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.001
   Google Scholar