Gendered inequalities in competitive grant funding: an overlooked dimension of gendered power relations in academia

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. doi: 10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, S., & Webber, M. (2017). Made to measure: Early career academics in the Canadian university workplace. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 541–554. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1288704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addabbo, T., Rodríguez-Modroño, P., & Gálvez-Muñoz, L. (2015). Gender budgeting in education from a wellbeing approach: An application to Italy and Spain. Politica Economica, 31(2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angervall, P., Beach, D., & Gustafsson, J. (2015). The unacknowledged value of female academic labour power for male research careers. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 815–827. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1011092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1–8. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
   Google Scholar
• Bedi, G., van Dam, N. T., & Munafo, M. (2012). Gender inequality in awarded research grants. The Lancet, 380(9840), 474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61292-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M., & La Valle, I. (2000). Who applies for research funding. Key factors shaping funding application behaviour among women and men in British higher education institutions. London: Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, P., Smith, L., Cooper, N., Williams, K., & O’Connor, H. (2015). Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science. Nature, 525(7568), 181–183. doi: 10.1038/525181a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budlender, D. (Ed.). (1996). The women’s budget. Cape Town: Institute for Democracy in South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, G. (2016). The spaces and places that women casual academics (often fail to) inhabit. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 45–57. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1121211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloy, J. A., Svider, P. F., Kovalerchik, O., Baredes, S., Kalyoussef, E., & Chandrasekhar, S. S. (2013). Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 149(1), 77–83. doi: 10.1177/0194599813486083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbe, B. (2015). Gender mainstreaming in public financing of universities: Central findings for Germany. Politica Economica, 31(2), 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). The gender challenge in research funding. Assessing the European national scenes. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/the-gender-challenge-in-research-funding-report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2016). She figures 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labour market. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., Burden, S., & Breen, G. (1997). No evidence of sexism in peer review. Nature, 390(6659), 438–438. doi: 10.1038/37213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Háskóli Íslands. (2013). Reglur Rannsóknarsjóðs. Retrieved from http://sjodir.hi.is/reglur_rannsoknasjods
   Google Scholar
• Head, M., Fitchett, J., Cooke, M., Wurie, F., & Atun, R. (2013). Differences in research funding for women scientists: A systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997–2010. BMJ Open, 3(12), e003362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijstra, T., Bjarnason, T., & Rafnsdóttir, G. (2015). Predictors of gender inequalities in the rank of full professor. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 214–230. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2014.904417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijstra, T., Einarsdóttir, Þ, Pétursdóttir, G., & Steinþórsdóttir, F. (2017). Testing the concept of academic housework in a European setting: Part of academic career-making or gendered barrier to the top? European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 200–214. doi: 10.1177/1474904116668884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijstra, T., Steinþórsdóttir, F., & Einarsdóttir, Þ. (2017). Academic career making and the double-edged role of academic housework. Gender and Education, 29(6), 764–780. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1171825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjálmarsdóttir, K. A. (2016). Sjóðir Háskóla Íslands 2010–2014: Yfirlit og kyngreining á gögnum úr umsóknarferli. Retrieved from http://www.hi.is/sites/default/files/atli/baeklingar/jafnretti/sjodir_haskola_islands_2010-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howson, C., Coate, K., & de St Croix, T. (2018). Mid-career academic women and the prestige economy. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 533–548. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1411337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudel, G. (2006). The ‘quality myth’: Promoting and hindering conditions for acquiring research funds. Higher Education, 52(3), 375–403. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6414-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, B. (2017). Measures of success: Cruel optimism and the paradox of academic women’s participation in Australian higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 486–497. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1290053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, L., & Monk, S. (2017). Early career academics learning the game in Whackademia. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1251–1263. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1303460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 114–128. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.864611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A. (2015). Favourable conditions for the adoption and implementation of gender budgeting: Insights from comparative analysis. Politica Economica, 31(2), 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafnsdóttir, G., & Heijstra, T. (2013). Balancing work-family life in academia: The power of time. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(3), 283–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rannís. (2013). Icelandic research fund 2013: New proposals. Retrieved from https://www.rannis.is/files/IRF_2013_new_proposals_227331425.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rannís. (2017). The Icelandic research fund’s handbook. Retrieved from https://en.rannis.is/media/rannsoknasjodur/IRF-Handbook-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rannís. (n.d.). Úthlutanir úr Rannsóknasjóði. Retrieved from https://sjodir.rannis.is/AllocatedFunds/rsj.php
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341. doi: 10.1177/030631293023002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., & Hällsten, M. (2008). Persistent nepotism in peer-review. Scientometrics, 74(2), 175–189. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0211-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., & Wold, A. (2015). Centres of excellence: Reward for gender or top-level research. In J. Björkman & B. Fjæstad (Eds.), Thinking ahead: Research, funding and the future. In RJ yearbook 2015/2016 (pp. 39–60). Gothenburg, Stockholm: Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., Wold, A., Jordansson, B., Ohlsson, B., & Smedberg, Å. (2010). Hans Excellens: om miljardsatsningarna på starka forskningsmiljöer. Retrieved from http://genus.gu.se/digitalAssets/1370/1370132_dj-hans-excellens.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steinþórsdóttir, F., Heijstra, T., & Einarsdóttir, Þ. (2017). The making of the ‘Excellent’ university: A drawback for gender equality. Ephemera, Theory & Politics in Organization, 17(3), 557–582.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. doi: 10.1177/1350508411414293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349–12353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbren, S., Bowles, H., Hasan, T., & Loeken, M. (2008). Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. Journal of Women’s Health, 17(2), 207–214. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387(6631), 341–343. doi: 10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteman, H. O., Hendricks, M., Straus, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2019). Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. The Lancet, 393(10171), 531–540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoega, G. (2017). Does research activity decline with age? Icelandic Review on Politics & Administration, 13(1), 103–117. doi: 10.13177/irpa.a.2017.13.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar