2,574
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Towards a structural inequality framework for student retention and success

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 259-272 | Received 16 Jul 2018, Accepted 09 May 2019, Published online: 11 Oct 2019

References

  • Archer, L., & Leathwood, C. (2003). Identities, inequalities and higher education. In Higher Education and Social Class: Issues of Exclusion and Inclusion, 171–191. London/New York: Routledge/Falmer.
  • Behrendt, L., Larkin, S., Griew, R., & Kelly, P. (2012). Review of higher education access and outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: Final report. Canberra: DIISRTE.
  • Bennett, A., Naylor, R., Mellor, K., Brett, M., Gore, J., Harvey, A., … Whitty, G. (2015). The critical interventions framework part 2: Equity initiatives in Australian higher education: A review of evidence of impact. Newcastle: The University of Newcastle.
  • Bexley, E. (2016). Further and higher? Institutional diversity and stratification. In A. Harvey, C. Bernheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A fair chance for all (pp. 275–292). New York: Springer.
  • Birmingham, S. (2017). New figures highlight need for uni performance funding. Press release.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. c. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
  • Brändle, T. (2017). How availability of capital affects the timing of enrollment: The routes to university of traditional and non-traditional students. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2229–2249. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1141401
  • Cardak, B. A., & Ryan, C. (2009). Participation in higher education in Australia: Equity and access. Economic Record, 85(271), 433–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00570.x
  • Dawkins, J. (1990). A fair chance for all: Higher education that’s within everyone’s reach. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Training.
  • Department of Education. (2016). Selected higher education statistics. Retrieved from http://education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics
  • Devlin, M. (2013). Bridging socio-cultural incongruity: Conceptualising the success of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds in Australian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 939–949. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.613991
  • Dunne, M., King, R., & Ahrens, J. (2014). Applying to higher education: Comparisons of independent and state schools. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9), 1649–1667. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.801433
  • Emirbayer, M., & Williams, E. M. (2005). Bourdieu and social work. Social Service Review, 79(4), 689–724. doi: 10.1086/491604
  • Gale, T. (2012). Towards a southern theory of student equity in Australian higher education: Enlarging the rationale for expansion. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(3), 238–262.
  • Gale, T., Parker, S., Rodd, P., Stratton, G., Sealey, T., & Moore, T. (2013). Student aspirations for higher education in Central Queensland: A survey of school students’ navigational capacities. Melbourne: Centre for Research in Education Futures and Innovation.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). ‘Cultural capital’: Some critical observations. Sociologica, 1(2), 1–23.
  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  • Harre, S. R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. London: Blackwell.
  • Harvey, A., Szalkowicz, G., & Luckman, M. (2017). The re-recruitment of students who have withdrawn from Australian higher education. Melbourne: Centre for Higher Education Equity and Diversity Research, La Trobe University.
  • Higher Education Standards Panel. (2017). Improving retention, completion and success in higher education. Canberra: Department of Education and Training.
  • Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.587140
  • Institute for Social Science Research. (2017). Review of identified equity groups: Appendices to the consulation paper. Appendix B – Key results. Queensland: University of Queensland.
  • James, R. (2002). Socioeconomic background and higher education participation: An analysis of school students’ aspirations and expectations. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
  • Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education: Final report for ALTC senior fellowship program. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
  • Lizzio, A. (2006). Designing an orientation and transition strategy for commencing students: A conceptual summary of research and practice. Brisbane: Griffith university.
  • Lopez, S. J., & Louis, M. C. (2009). The principles of strengths-based education. Journal of College and Character, 10(4). doi: 10.2202/1940-1639.1041
  • Loveday, V. (2015). Working-class participation, middle-class aspiration? Value, upward mobility and symbolic indebtedness in higher education. The Sociological Review, 63(3), 570–588. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12167
  • Lovitts, B. E. (1996). Who is responsible for graduate student attrition – The individual or the institution? Toward an explanation of the high and persistent rate of attrition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American education research association. New York.
  • Madden, B. (2015). Pedagogical pathways for Indigenous education with/in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.005
  • Mander, D. J., Cohen, L., & Pooley, J. A. (2015). ‘If I wanted to have more opportunities and go to a better school, I just had to get used to it’: Aboriginal students’ perceptions of going to boarding school in Western Australia. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 44(1), 26–36. doi: 10.1017/jie.2015.3
  • Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
  • McNeal, R. B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(1), 117–144. doi: 10.1093/sf/78.1.117
  • Naylor, R., Baik, C., & James, R. (2013). Developing a critical interventions framework for advancing equity in Australian higher education. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
  • Naylor, R., & James, R. (2015). Systemic equity challenges: An overview of the role of Australian universities in student equity and social inclusion. In M. Shah, A. Bennett, & E. Southgate (Eds.), Widening higher education participation: A global perspective (pp. 1–13). USA and UK: Chandos Publishing.
  • Naylor, R., & Mifsud, N. (2019). Structural inequality in higher education: Creating institutional cultures that enable all students. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Nelson, K. J., Picton, C., McMillan, J., Edwards, D., Devlin, M., & Martin, K. (2017). Undestanding the completion patterns of equity students in regional universities. Perth, WA: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
  • Nikula, P.-T. (2017). Socioeconomic inequalities in higher education: A meta-method analysis of twenty-first century studies in Finland and New Zealand. Studies in Higher Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1326024
  • Norton, A. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
  • O’Shea, S. (2016). First-in-family learners and higher education: Negotiating the ‘silences’ of university transition and participation. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 3, 5–23.
  • O’Shea, S., Lysaght, P., Roberts, J., & Harwood, V. (2016). Shifting the blame in higher education – social inclusion and deficit discourses. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 322–336. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1087388
  • Pechenkina, E. (2017). ‘It becomes almost an act of defiance’: Indigenous Australian transformational resistance as a driver of academic achievement. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(4), 463–477. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2015.1121220
  • Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2009). How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(4), 411–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x
  • Productivity Commission. (2017). University education, Shifting the dial: 5 year productivity review, supporting paper No. 7. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
  • Rendón, L. I., Jalomo, R. E., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, 1, 127–156.
  • Robbins, D. (1993). The practical importance of Bourdieu’s analyses of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 18(2), 151–163. doi: 10.1080/03075079312331382339
  • Rorty, R. (1979). Transcendental arguments, self-reference, and pragmatism. In Transcendental arguments and science (pp. 77–103). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Rothenberg, P. S. (2000). Invisible privilege: A memoir about race, class, and gender. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  • Rowlands, J. (2017). Deepening understandings of Bourdieu’s academic and intellectual capital through a study of academic voice within academic governance. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1284192
  • Smit, R. (2012). Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3), 369–380. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.634383
  • Teese, R. (2007). Structural inequality in Australian education. In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy, 374–396. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_14
  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2017). Characteristics of Australian higher education providers and their relation to first-year student attrition. Melbourne: Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
  • Tierney, W. G. (2000). Power, identity, and the dilemma of college student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, 213–234. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. doi: 10.3102/00346543045001089
  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • United Nations Educational Social and Cultural Organization. (2015). UNESCO Institute for statistics data on education. Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/:
  • Watson, J., & Widin, J. (2015). Maintaining the status quo: Symbolic violence in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3), 658–670. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.973374
  • White, J. W., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2011). Minority college students and tacit ‘codes of power’: Developing academic discourses and identities. Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 283–318. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2010.0028
  • Winkle-Wagner, R. (2010). Cultural capital: The promises and pitfalls in education research: AEHE, Volume 36, Number 1. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2005). Integration and adaptation: Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6(1), 46–59. doi: 10.1177/1469787405049946

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.