Typical scope of time commitment and research outputs of Thesis by Publication in Australia

References

• Ansmann, L., Flickinger, T. E., Barello, S., Kunneman, M., Mantwill, S., Quilligan, S., … Aelbrecht, K. (2014). Career development for early career academics: Benefits of networking and the role of professional societies. Patient Education and Counseling, 97(1), 132–134. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification. Belconnen, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2018). Promotion of Excellence in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (PELTHE) final report. Reframing the PhD for Australia’s future universities. Canberra: Office for Learning & Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Education and Training (DET). (2018). 2017 Section 14 – Award course completions. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/51381
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Education and Training (DET). (2019). Research Block Grants. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/research-block-grants
   Google Scholar
• Australian Research Council. (2016). Annual Report 2015–16. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ARC/Annual%20Reports/2015-16/ARC_Annual_Report_2015-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. E., & Rolfe, G. (2009). PhD by publication: A prospective as well as retrospective award? Some subversive thoughts. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 590–594. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodou, D., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2014). Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 36, 487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geven, K., Skopek, J., & Triventi, M. (2018). How to increase PhD completion rates? An impact evaluation of two reforms in a selective graduate school, 1976–2012. Research in Higher Education, 59(5), 529–552. doi: 10.1007/s11162-017-9481-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, N. T. (2010). Deconstructing doctoral dissertations: How many papers does it take to make a PhD? Scientometrics, 85, 567–579. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0214-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohwü, L., Lyshol, H., Gissler, M., Jonsson, S. H., Petzold, M., & Obel, C. (2013). Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: A mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), e173. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H., & Santos, J. M. (2016). The impact of publishing during PhD studies on career research publication, visibility, and collaborations. Research in Higher Education, 57, 28–50. doi: 10.1007/s11162-015-9380-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implications for practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 355–368. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.692666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Joober, R., Schmitz, N., Annable, L., & Boksa, P. (2012). Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 37(3), 149–152. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V. (2012). On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics, 90(2), 463–481. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0495-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Kamler, B. (2008). Bringing pedagogy to doctoral publishing. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 511–523. doi: 10.1080/13562510802334723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1194–1210. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macquarie University. (n.d.). Macquarie University – Thesis by publication model. Retrieved from https://www.mq.edu.au/research/research-centres-groups-and-facilities/healthy-people/centres/macquarie-university-special-education-centre-musec/postgraduate-research/thesis-by-publication-model
   Google Scholar
• Mason, S. (2018). Publications in the doctoral thesis: Challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1231–1244. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1462307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S., & Merga, M. K. (2018a). A current view of the thesis by publication in the humanities and social sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 139–154. doi:10.28945/3983.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, S., & Merga, M. K. (2018b). Integrating publications in the social science doctoral thesis by publication. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1454–1471. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1498461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. (2015). Thesis by publication in education: An autoethnographic perspective for educational re-searchers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 291–308. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/merga.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, J., & Hopgood, K. (2012). The PhD thesis by publication in engineering: Insights for supervisors. In Profession of engineering education: Advancing teaching, research and careers: 23rd annual conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education 2012 (pp. 884–891). Melbourne: Engineers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2009). Negotiating authorship for doctoral dissertation publications. Qualitative Health Research, 19(1), 3–4. doi: 10.1177/1049732308326637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369–386. doi: 10.1080/0307507022000011507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/eag-2018-en.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207. doi: 10.1080/13600800500120068
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, S. (2017). The PhD by publication. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 123–134. doi: 10.28945/3781
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Coverage error in internet surveys. Who web-only surveys miss and how that affects results. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2015-09-22_coverage-error-in-internet-surveys.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534–548. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, D., Melkers, J., & Youtie, J. (2014). Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 81, 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research? Nature News, 530(7589), 148–151. doi: 10.1038/530148a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poyatos Matas, C. (2012). Doctoral education and skills development: An international perspective. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 10(2), 163–191. doi: 10.4995/redu.2012.6102
   Google Scholar
• Queensland University of Technology Research Higher Degrees Committee. (2017). Thesis by Published Papers Guidelines. Retrieved from https://cms.qut.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/7235/thesis-by-published-papers-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rawat, S., & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(2), 87–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). Phd by publication: A student’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), M3.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. J. (2010). Inclusion criteria. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sharmini, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). Examiners’ commentary on the thesis with publications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(6), 672–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siniscalco, M. T., & Auriat, N. (2005). Questionnaire design. In K. N. Ross (Ed.), Quantitative research methods in educational planning (pp. 1–86). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002145/214555E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slevitch, L. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative methodologies compared: Ontological and epistemological perspectives. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 12, 73–81. doi: 10.1080/1528008X.2011.541810
   Google Scholar
• University of Newcastle. (2015). Thesis by publication information sheet. Retrieved from https://www.Newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/210722/Info-sheet-thesis-by-publication-August-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar