Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data

References

• Abukari, Z. (2016). Awareness and incidence of plagiarism among students of higher education: A case study of Narh-Bita College. University of Ghana. Retrieved from http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/21270
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001, August 22). Australian standard classification of education. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/0/F501C031BD9AC9C5CA256AAF001FCA33?opendocument
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, E. M. (2014). Students reported for cheating explain what they think would have stopped them. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 229–252. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.845533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram Gallant, T. (2017). Academic integrity as a teaching & learning issue: From theory to practice. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 88–94. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2017.1308173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, S. D. (2016). What it means to be a student today. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 383–406). doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_57
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, A. M., & Ferns, S. (2014). Embedding of authentic assessment in work-integrated learning curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15(4), 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., … van Haeringen, K. (2018). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P. M., van Haeringen, K., … Rozenberg, P. (2019a). Contract cheating and assessment design: Exploring the relationship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 676–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Rundle, K., Newton, P. M., Ellis, C., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019b). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: A comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., McGowan, U., East, J., … James, C. (2014). ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1150–1169. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.777406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., & Appleton, J. (2001). Plagiarism: A good practice guide. Retrieved from JISC website: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/plagiarism/brookes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of 2nd international plagiarism conference. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.120.5440&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2007). Establishing a systematic six-stage process for detecting contract cheating. In 2007 2nd International conference on pervasive computing and applications (pp. 342–347). doi: 10.1109/ICPCA.2007.4365466
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2014). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 513–529. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1932-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T. B. (2009). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do (1st ed.). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., Zucker, I. M., & Randall, D. (2018). The infernal business of contract cheating: Understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1. doi: 10.1007/s40979-017-0024-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltýnek, T., & Králíková, V. (2018). Analysis of the contract cheating market in Czechia. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1). doi: 10.1007/s40979-018-0027-8
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 18.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, I. (2014). Responses to student plagiarism in higher education across Europe. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481. doi: 10.1080/03075070903096508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Bretag, T., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2018). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university staff. Studies in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1462789
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 305–322. doi: 10.1080/0729436980170304
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J. A., & Herrington, A. J. (2006). Authentic conditions for authentic assessment: Aligning task and assessment. Critical Visions: Thinking, Learning and Researching in Higher Education: Research and Development in Higher Education, 29, 141–151. HERDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, T., Curtis, H., MacAlister, D., & Farrell, G. (2016). Student academic dishonesty: The potential for situational prevention. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10511253.2015.1064982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, H. L., Lewis, M. A., & Talbot, R. M., III. (2008). Building a framework for determining the authenticity of instructional tasks within teacher education programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., Emmerton, L., & McKauge, L. (2013). Academic integrity and plagiarism: A review of the influences and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 369–380. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.687362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 639–654). doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_17
   Google Scholar
• Lines, L. (2016). Ghostwriters guaranteeing grades? The quality of online ghostwriting services available to tertiary students in Australia. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1198759
   Google Scholar
• Lok, B., McNaught, C., & Young, K. (2016). Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments: Compatibility and complementarity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 450–465. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1022136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262536
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Z. (2009). Contract cheating: A new phenomenon in cyber-plagiarism. Communications of the IBIMA, 10(12), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1080/00049530412331283426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, C., Lang, C., Usdansky, M., Kanani, M., Jamieson, M., Gallant, T. B., & George, V. (2016). Institutional toolkit to combat contract cheating. Retrieved from http://undergrad.fiu.edu/academic-integrity/pdfs/Contract%20Cheating.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morris, E. J. (2016). Academic integrity: A teaching and learning approach. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 1037–1053). doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_11
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., & Archbald, D. A. (1992). The nature of authentic academic achievement. In Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment (pp. 71–83). New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 3. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00067
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P. M., & Lang, C. (2016). Custom essay writers, freelancers and other paid third parties. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 249–272). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, A., Cakitaki, B., & Grattan Institute. (2016). Mapping Australian higher education 2016. Carlton: Grattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Learning and Teaching. (2015). 2016 innovation and development grants and strategic priority commissioned grants: Programme information and application instructions. Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J., McAllister, C., Grinnell, L., Walters, K. G., & Appunn, F. (2016). Applying constant comparative method with multiple investigators and inter-coder reliability. The Qualitative Report, 21(1), 26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M., & Roberts, T. S. (2012). Plagiarism on the rise? Combating contract cheating in science courses. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (Formerly CAL-Laborate International), 20(4), Retrieved from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/5803
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: Plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.
   Google Scholar
• QAA. (2017). Contracting to cheat in higher education: How to address contract cheating, the use of third-party services and essay mills. Retrieved from The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education website: www.qaa.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 293–313. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9116-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2018, September 18). Students with lowest ATAR scores ‘being offered places in teaching degrees.’ ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-18/students-lowest-atar-scores-teaching-degree-offers-secret-report/10200666
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. M. (2017). Detecting contract cheating in essay and report submissions: Process, patterns, clues and conversations. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1). doi: 10.1007/s40979-017-0021-6
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2018). Digest of education statistics, 2016 (p. 970). The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Court of Queensland. (n.d.). [2004] QCA 88 – Re AJG.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet, and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• TEQSA. (2017). Good practice note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net2046/f/good-practice-note-addressing-contract-cheating.pdf?v=1507082628
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205–214. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visentin, L. (2015, April 13). Sydney University to crack down on cheating following MyMaster investigation. Retrieved from The Sydney Morning Herald website: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/sydney-university-to-crack-down-on-cheating-following-mymaster-investigation-20150413-1mju3q.html
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: A new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(1), 27–44. doi: 10.1007/s10805-012-9150-y
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93. doi: 10.1177/003172171109200721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. (2007). First-year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 199–216. doi: 10.1080/07294360701310813
   Google Scholar