Mentoring and sponsorship in higher education institutions: men’s invisible advantage in STEM?

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464. doi: 10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamo, S. A. (2013). Attrition of women in the biological sciences: Workload, motherhood, and other explanations revisited. BioScience, 63(1), 43–48. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcroft, A., & Taylor, D. (2013). Support for new career academics: An integrated model for research intensive university business and management schools. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 827–840. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.599378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almgren, N., Salminen-Karlsson, M., Molin, F., Topuzova, I., Apolstolov, G., Baisner, L., & Myers, E. (2015). Improving meeting culture. Retrieved from http://www.festa-europa.eu/sites/festa-europa.eu/files/6.1.1.%20Report%20Meeting%20Structures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B., & Goode, J. (2001). The contradiction of the myth of individual merit and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation. European Journal of Women's Studies, 8(2), 161–180. doi: 10.1177/135050680100800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S., & Williams, W. M. (2011, February 22). Understanding current causes of women’s under-representation in science. PNAS, 108(8), 3157–3162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 1–42). California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J., & Binns, J. (2018). Sponsorship: Creating career opportunities for women in higher education. Canberra: Universities Australia Executive Women (UAEW). Retrieved from https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/UAEW/SponsorGuide
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. A., & van den Brink, M. (2016). Transformative gender interventions: Linking theory and practice using the ‘bifocal’ approach. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 429–448. doi: 10.1108/EDI-05-2016-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R., & Meyerson, D. (2000). Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization, 7, 589–608. doi: 10.1177/135050840074005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foust-Cummings, H., Dinolfo, S., & Kohler, J. (2011). Sponsoring women to success. New York: Catalyst.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2010). Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(7), 997–1012. doi: 10.1177/0002764209356234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, M., Tiggemann, M., Kearns, H., & Marshall, K. (2007). Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 425–442. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658633
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, C. (2016). Male vs female: Which mentor is best? Retrieved from http://www.divinecaroline.com/life-etc/career-money/male-vs-female-which-mentor-best
   Google Scholar
• Grummell, B., Lynch, K., & Devine, D. (2009). Appointing senior managers in education: Homosociability, local logics and authenticity in the selection process. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 37(3), 329–349. doi: 10.1177/1741143209102783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.), Women and Revolution (pp. 1–41). Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41–53. doi: 10.1080/07294360220124648
   Google Scholar
• Heijstra, T. M., Einarsdóttir, Þ, Pétursdóttir, G. M., & Steinþórsdóttir, F. S. (2017). Testing the concept of academic housework in a European setting: Part of academic career-making or gendered barrier to the top? European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 200–214. doi: 10.1177/1474904116668884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, S. A. (2013). Forget a mentor, find a sponsor: The new way to fast-track your career. Harvard: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. (2001). Sexism, support and survival in academia. Academic women and hidden discrimination in Finland. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., Carter, M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, September 2010. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2010/09/why-men-still-get-more-promotions-than-women
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Smithson, J. (2001). Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life. Human Relations, 55(11), 1455–1481. doi: 10.1177/00187267015411003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorber-Newsome, J. (2008). The chemistry PhD: The impact on women’s retention. London: UK Resource Centre for Women in SET and the Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, L., & Monk, S. (2017). Early career academics learning the game in whackacademia. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1251–1263. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1303460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. (2008). The micropolitics of professionalism: Power and collective identities in higher education. In B. Cunningham (Ed.), Exploring professionalism (pp. 99–120). London: Bedford Way Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS, 109(41), 16474–16479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, W. M. (2016). Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obers, N. (2015). Influential structures: Understanding the role of the head of department in relation to women’s academic careers. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1220–1232. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P. (2011). Where do women fit in university senior management? An analytical typology of cross-national organisational cultures. In B. Bagilhole, & K. White (Eds.), Gender, power and management: A cross cultural analysis of higher education (pp. 168–191). UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P. (2018). Gender imbalance in senior positions: What is the problem? What can be done? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 28–50. doi: 10.1080/23322969.2018.1552084
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P., Montez López, E., O’ Hagan, C., Wolffram, A., et al. (2017). Micro-political practices in higher education: A challenge to excellence as a rationalising myth? Critical Studies in Education. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2017.1381629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P., & O’Hagan, C. (2016). Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: A problematic reality? Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1943–1957. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.1000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QS. (2017). World university rankings 2016–17. Retrieved from www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen-Karlsson, M. (2017). FESTA Handbook of organisational change. Retrieved from http://www.festa-europa.eu/sites/festa-europa.eu/files/The%20FESTA%20handbook%20of%20organizational%20change.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2004). The pedagogy of ‘good’ PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral student’s completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. doi: 10.28945/4113
   Google Scholar
• Trower, C. (2012). Success on the tenure track. Boston: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00495.x
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Benshop, Y. (2012a). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. doi: 10.1177/1350508411414293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Benshop, Y. (2012b). Slaying the seven headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender Work and Organisation, 19(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organisation. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wenneras, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature, 387(6631), 341–343. Retrieved from www.sciencethatmatters.com/wp,content/uploads/2007/04/wenneras97nepotism.pdf doi: 10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. (2014). Keeping women in science. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar