References
- Birdwell, J. A., & Peshkin, M. (2015, June). Capturing technical lectures on lightboard paper [Paper presentation]. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23664.
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
- Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_4
- Devlin, M., & Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903244398
- Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
- Engle, R. A. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts and developments. In Y. Dai (Ed.), Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning (pp. 161–200). Routledge.
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
- Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001001
- Fraser, S. (2019). Understanding innovative teaching practice in higher education: A framework for reflection. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1654439
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
- Hemer, S. R. (2014). Finding time for quality teaching: An ethnographic study of academic workloads in the social sciences and their impact on teaching practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841647
- Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439
- Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104-1–02104-15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104
- Kezar, A. (2012). Embracing non-tenure track faculty: Changing campuses for the new faculty majority. Routledge.
- Kezar, A. (2013). Examining non-tenure track faculty perceptions of how departmental policies and practices shape their performance and ability to create student learning at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(5), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9288-5
- Koretsky, M. D., Vauras, M., Jones, C., Iiskala, T., & Volet, S. (2019). Productive disciplinary engagement in high-and low-outcome student groups: Observations from three collaborative science learning contexts. Research in Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9838-8
- Lord, M. (2019). Rumbling in the Ranks. ASEE Prism, 29(2), 28–32.
- National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
- Otero, V., Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2010). A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model. American Journal of Physics, 78(11), 1218–1224. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3471291
- Pollock, S. J., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010110
- Quardokus Fisher, K., & Henderson, C. (2018). Department-level instructional change: Comparing prescribed versus emergent strategies. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0031
- Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
- Steinhardt, I., Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Baumann, J., & Krücken, G. (2017). Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: The emergence of a specialty? Higher Education, 74(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0045-5
- Venturini, P., & Amade-Escot, C. (2014). Analysis of conditions leading to a productive disciplinary engagement during a physics lesson in a disadvantaged area school. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.003
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
- Wolf, D. L. (2018). Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Routledge.