References
- Adema, J. (2015). Knowledge production beyond the book? Performing the scholarly monograph in contemporary digital culture [Doctoral dissertation]. http://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/8222ccb2-f6b0-4e5f-90de-f4c62c77ac86/1
- Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2009). Changing practices of doctoral education. Routledge.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Cumming, J. (2009). The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 877–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834191
- Dong, Y. R. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9
- Fischer, J., Ritchie, E. G., & Hanspach, J. (2012). Academia’s obsession with quantity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(9), 473–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.010
- Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80116-7
- Gould, J. (2016). Future of the thesis. Nature, 535(7610), 26–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/535026a
- Guerin, C. (2016). Connecting the dots: Writing a doctoral thesis by publication. In C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 31–50). Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338.
- Hagen, N. T. (2010). Deconstructing doctoral dissertations: How many papers does it take to make a PhD? Scientometrics, 85(2), 567–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0214-8
- Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implica- tions for practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.692666
- Jowsey, T., Corter, A., & Thompson, A. (2020). Are doctoral theses with articles more popular than monographs? Supervisors and students in biological and health sciences weigh up risks and benefits. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 719–732. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1693517
- Kivistö, S., & Pihlström, S. (2015). The monograph – an old-fashioned publication forum or an ultimate scholarly achievement? University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/collegium/events/monografia/monografia. pdf
- Kwan, B.S.C. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59. 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x
- Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
- Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. E., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 699–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863850
- Mason, S. (2018). Publications in the doctoral thesis: Challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1231–1244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1462307
- Mason, S., & Merga, M. K. (2018). A current view of the thesis by publication in the humanities and social sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 139–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/3983
- Mason, S., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2019). Choosing the thesis by publication approach: Motivations and influencers for doctoral candidates. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(5), 857–871 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00367-7
- Mason, S., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Typical scope of time commitment and research outputs of thesis by publication in Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1674253
- McDowell, L., & Liardét, C. L. (2019). Japanese materials scientists’ experiences with English for research publication purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 141–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.011
- Nagano, R. L., & Bukovszki Spiczéné, E. (2018). Phd publication requirements and practices: A multidisciplinary case study of a Hungarian university. In M. J. Curry & T. Lillis (Eds.), Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies (pp. 37–49). Multilingual Matters.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2018). Sources, methods and technical notes, in education at a Glance 2018: OECD indicators, Australia country report. OECD Publishing.
- Paltridge, B. (2019). Looking inside the world of peer review: Implications for graduate student writers. Language Teaching, 52(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000150
- Paré, A. (2017). Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision/reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervision. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 40(3), 407–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.1341102
- Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
- Pitt, R., & Mewburn, I. (2016). Academic superheroes? A critical analysis of academic job descriptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1126896
- Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). Phd by publication: A student’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), Article M3. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/136/154
- Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students’ composing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 10(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(91)90024-Q
- Wei, J., Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2019). Handling the loss of innocence: First-time exchange of writing and feedback in doctoral supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1541074