References
- Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009, August). ‘Learning supervision’: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068805
- Argyris, C. (2005). Double-loop learning in organizations: A theory of action perspective. Smith and Hitt.
- Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(5), 625–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735
- Becker, P., Bengtsson, M., Nilsson, D., Nordquist, B., Thelander, C., & Toth-Szabo, Z. (2010). Approaches to doctoral supervision in relation to student expectations. http://www.brand.lth.se/fileadmin/brandteknik/utbild/Pedagogik/resurser/Report__final_version_.pdf
- Bitzer, E. M., Trafford, V. N., & Leshem, S. (2013). ‘Love it when you speak foreigń: A trans-national perspective on the professional development of doctoral supervisors in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 27(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20853/27-4-282
- Bøgelund, P. (2015). How supervisors perceive PhD supervision–And how they practice it. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/2096
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
- Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2013). Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.576338
- Carnevale, A. P., & Goldstein, H. (1983). Employee training: Its changing role and an analysis of new data. American Society for Training and Development.
- Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2004). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3365/eml.2010.12.151
- Cryer, P., & Mertens, P. (2003). The PhD examination: Support and training for supervisors and examiners. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471515
- Darwin, A., & Palmer, E. (2009). Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360902725017
- Denis, C., Colet, N. R., & Lison, C. (2019). Doctoral supervision in North America: Perception and challenges of supervisor and supervisee. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n1p30
- Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: On developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310797
- Evans, L. (2019). Implicit and informal professional development: What it ‘looks like’, how it occurs, and why we need to research it. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1441172
- Fulgence, K. (2019). A theoretical perspective on How doctoral supervisors develop supervision skills. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 721–739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/4446
- Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953
- Guerin, C., Kerr, H., & Green, I. (2014). Supervision pedagogies: Narratives from the field. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957271
- Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
- Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798
- Harrison, S., & Grant, C. (2015). Exploring of new models of research pedagogy: Time to let go of master-apprentice style supervision? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 556–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1036732
- Henderson, E. F. (2017). Anticipating doctoral supervision: (Not) bridging the transition from supervisee to supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1382466
- Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2020). Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1742764
- Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. Students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
- Kandlbinder, P. (2005). Postgraduate supervisor development through ICT. Quality Issues in ICT-Based Higher Education, 14(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416198
- Kaplan, R., Drath, W., & Kofodimos, J. (1987). High hurdles: The challenge of executive self-development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1987.4275735
- Kiley, M. (2011). Developments in research supervisor training: Causes and responses. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 585–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594595
- Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Cambridge university press.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
- Koshy, V. (2009). Action research for improving educational practice: A step-by-step guide. Sage.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
- Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
- Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
- Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339(jul21 1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
- Lusted, D. (1986). Why pedagogy? Screen, 27(5), 2–14.
- Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342
- Maritz, J., & Prinsloo, P. (2015). A Bourdieusian perspective on becoming and being a postgraduate supervisor: The role of capital. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 972–985. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011085
- Marsick, V. J. (1988). Learning in the workplace: The case for reflectivity and critical reflectivity. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(4), 187–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848188038004001
- Marsick, V. J., Watkins, K., & Watkins, K. (2015). Informal and Incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715926
- Maxwell, S. (2010). Research supervision: The research management matrix. Higher Education, 59(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9256-3
- McCormack, C. (2009). Stories return personal narrative ways of knowing to the professional development of doctoral supervisors. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927485
- McCormack, C., & Kennelly, R. (2011). ‘We must get together and really talk … ’. Connection, engagement and safety sustain learning and teaching conversation communities. Reflective Practice, 12(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.590342
- McCormack, C., & Pamphilon, B. (2004). More than a confessional: Postmodern groupwork to support postgraduate supervisors’ professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000172694
- McCulloch, A., & Loeser, C. (2016). Does research degree supervisor training work? The impact of a professional development induction workshop on supervision practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 968–982. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139547
- Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quaterly, 32(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368103200101
- Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 25(25), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719852504
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
- Olmos-López, P., & Sunderland, J. (2017). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166
- Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022011
- Raffing, R., Jensen, T., & Tønnesen, H. (2017). Self-reported needs for improving the supervision competence of PhD supervisors from the medical sciences in Denmark. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1023-z
- Roumell, E., & Bolliger, D. (2017). Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320179
- Sawyer, R. D. (2002). Situating teacher development: The view from two teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 733–753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00068-5
- Schneijderberg, C. (2019). Supervision practices of doctoral education and training. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1689384
- Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
- Spiller, D., Byrnes, G., & Bruce-Ferguson, P. (2013). Enhancing postgraduate supervision through a process of conversational inquiry. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 833–845. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.776519
- Taylor, S. (2018). Eligibility to supervise: A study of UK institutions. UKCGE.
- Turner, G. (2015). Learning to supervise: Four journeys. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981840
- Van der Westhuizen, P., & De Wet, J. (2002). The training needs of supervisors of postgraduate students in the social sciences and humanities. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v16i3.25231
- Wadee, A., Keane, M., Dietz, A., & Hay, D. (2010). Effective PhD supervision: Mentorship and coaching. Rozenberg Publishers.
- Wichmann-Hansen, G., Godskesen, M., & Kiley, M. (2019). Successful development programs for experienced doctoral supervisors–what does it take? International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1663352
- Wisker, G., & Kiley, M. (2014). Professional learning: Lessons for supervision from doctoral examining. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.727762