References
- Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Henke, J. N., & Burgess, W. D. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1339/1029
- Alesech, J., & Nayar, S. (2019). Teacher strategies for promoting acceptance and belonging in the classroom: A New Zealand study. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1600054
- Asino, T. I., & Pulay, A. (2019). Student perceptions on the role of the classroom environment on computer supported collaborative learning. TechTrends, 63(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0353-y
- Baron, E. B. (1992). Discipline strategies for teachers. Fastback, 344. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED356201.pdf
- Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
- Bolden, E. C., Oestreich, T. M., Kenney, M. J., & Yuhnke, B. T. (2019). Location, location, location: A comparison of student experience in a lecture hall to a small classroom using similar techniques. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417742018
- Budge, D. (2000). Secret is in the seating. Times Educational Supplement, 4396, 26. https://www.tes.com/news/secret-seating
- Chiu, P. H. P., & Cheng, S. H. (2016). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1196475
- Clinton, V., & Wilson, N. (2019). More than chalkboards: Classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09287-w
- Cornell, P. (2002). The impact of changes in teaching and learning on furniture and the learning environment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(92), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.77
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
- Evans, J. C., Yip, H., Chan, K., Armatas, C., & Tse, A. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Professional development in a Hong Kong university. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1685943
- Fisher, A. V., Godwin, K. E., & Seltman, H. (2014). Visual environment, attention allocation, and learning in young children. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533801
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Routledge.
- Gremmen, M. C., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016). Considerations for classroom seating arrangements and the role of teacher characteristics and beliefs. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 749–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9353-y
- Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring students behavior on seating arrangements in learning environment: A review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.032
- Han, H., Kiatkawsin, K., Kim, W., & Hong, J. H. (2017). Physical classroom environment and student satisfaction with courses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1299855
- Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.
- Hlas, A. C., Neyers, K., & Molitor, S. (2019). Measuring student attention in the second language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817713766
- Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0
- Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
- Kinahan, M. P. (2017). Teachers and seating arrangements and assignments: A qualitative study [Doctoral dissertation]. Northeastern University. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:cj82q019x/fulltext.pdf
- Lewinski, P. (2015). Effects of classrooms’ architecture on academic performance in view of telic vs paratelic motivation: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00746
- Lietz, P. (2010). Research into questionnaire design: A summary of the literature. International Journal of Market Research, 52(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2501/s147078530920120x
- Lotfy, N. (2012). Seating arrangement and cooperative learning activities: Students’ on-task/off-task participation in EFL classrooms [Master’s thesis]. The American University in Cairo. https://dar.aucegypt.edu/handle/10526/3157
- Martin, A. J. (2009). The motivation and engagement scale. Lifelong Achievement Group. http://www.lifelongachievement.com
- McCorskey, J. C., & McVetta, R. W. (1978). Classroom seating arrangements: Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27(3), 99–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527809378281
- Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (2014). The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 504–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881392
- Moeller, A. J. (2016). The confluence of language assessment and mixed methods. In A. J. Moeller, J. W. Cresswell, & N. Saville (Eds.), Second language assessment and mixed methods research (pp. 3–16). Cambridge University Press.
- Ochola, J. E., & Achrazoglou, G. L. (2015). Maximizing opportunities: Smart learning spaces, smarter interactions and collaboration. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n1a12
- Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0
- Ramli, N. H., Ahmad, S., & Masri, M. H. (2013). Improving the classroom physical environment: Classroom users’ perception. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 221–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.195
- Reinke, N. B. (2019). Promoting student engagement and academic achievement in first-year anatomy and physiology courses. Advances in Physiology Education, 43(4), 443–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00205.2018
- Robichaux, N. M. (2016). Effects of various seating arrangement on disruptive classroom behavior [Doctoral dissertation]. Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4695&context=gradschool_dissertations
- Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
- Serrano, D. R., Dea-Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez-Burgos, E., Serrano-Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12330
- Shernoff, D. J., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez-Wall, L., Ruzek, E. A., Sinha, S., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Separate worlds: The influence of seating location on student engagement, classroom experience, and performance in the large university lecture hall. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 55–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.12.002
- Vercellotti, M. L. (2017). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735606
- Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x
- Wei, Y., Yang, Q., Chen, J., & Hu, J. (2018). The exploration of a machine learning approach for the assessment of learning styles changes. Mechatronic Systems and Control (Formerly Control and Intelligent Systems), 46(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.201.2018.3.201-2979
- Wilburn, V. G., Wasmuth, S., Fehr, C., Brokamp, K., Shupe, M., Hursey, B., Ross, K., & Nelson, J. (2019). The implications of desk arrangement on social interaction in a third grade classroom. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 12(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1474833