‘Ways of being’: a model for supportive doctoral supervisory relationships and supervision

References

• Becher, T. (1993). Graduate education in Britain: The view from the ground. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), The research foundations of graduate education: Germany, Britain, France, United States, Japan (pp. 115–153). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buirski, N. (2020). Is mindfulness a useful next trend in doctoral supervision? Australian Universities Review, 62(2), 61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buirski, N. (2021). Liminal emotions and mindfulness traits of well-regarded supervisors in highly valued doctoral supervisory relationships. SN Social Sciences, 1(2), 46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00049-7
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2008). Threshold concepts: Old wine in new bottles or a new form of transactional curriculum inquiry? In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 261–272). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, A., & Manathunga, C. (2012). Letter from the editors. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Doloriert, C., Sambrook, S., & Stewart, J. (2012). Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 732–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255566
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., Ryland, K., Tennant, M., & Boud, D. (2010). Building research supervision and training across Australian universities: Final report. University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M., & Vabø, A. (2006). Academic identities. In M. Kogan, M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, & M. Henkel (Eds.), Transforming higher education: A comparative study (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 127–159). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2011). Developments in research supervisor training: Causes and responses. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 585–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, N. (2009). More time to think: A way of being in the world. Fisher King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J., & Smith, J. (2008). Preface. In R. Land, J. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. ix–xxi). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J., & Young, M. (2014). Disciplines, skills and the university. Higher Education, 67(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9646-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. (2003). The doctoral education experience: Diversity and complexity. Department of Education, Science and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and doctorates (Vol. 16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. C. E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Sambrook, S., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision … a view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781473
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E. (2005). The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 29–36). W H Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Conklin Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Exley, K., Antoniou, M., & Ridley, P. (2008). One-to-one with students: Supervising, coaching, mentoring, and personal tutoring. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar