Where does all the ‘know how’ go? The role of tacit knowledge in research impact

References

• Agrawal, A. (2006). Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D., Antonacopoulou, E., & Cummings, T. (2014). Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 623–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E. (2009). Impact and scholarship: Unlearning and practising to co-create actionable knowledge. Management Learning, 40(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609336708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, M. (2010). Corporations in evolving diversity: Cognition, governance, and institutional rules. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ARC. (2018). Australian research council submission guidelines, commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.arc.gov.au/excellence-research-australia/key-documents
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J., & Rynes, S. (2010). The construction and contributions of "implications for practice": What's in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, N., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2010). Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters. Organization Studies, 31(9-10), 1341–1367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610374396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D., & Zoltan, D. (1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627–655. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P., & Richards, D. (2004). Modelling tacit knowledge via questionnaire data. In: P. Eklund (eds.). Concept lattices. ICFCA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2961. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang, C., Jackson, S., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Can knowledge-intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge. Journal of Management, 42(2), 524–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., & Watermeyer, R. (2017). Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2360–2372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1144182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., Watermeyer, R., & Wakeling, P. (2017). Fear and loathing in the academy? The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 555–568. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1288709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A., & Scaratti, G. (2017). Embedding impact in engaged research: Developing socially useful knowledge through dialogical sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2018). Reconceptualising research impact: Reflections on the real-world impact of research in an Australian context. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1366–1379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1504005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M., Alderto, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (1998). Development of knowledge and skills in employment. Sussex University Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. (2007). Relational networks of knowledge production in transnational law firms. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 38(5), 925–940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrick, J., & Chan, A. (2017). Knowledge management and professional experience: The uneasy dynamics between tacit knowledge and performativity in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 872–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. (1995). Being there: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/144433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New production of knowledge: The dynamics of Science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, S. (2006). Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of nonaka's theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1415–1436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00637.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, E. B., & Gregory, M. (1997). Tacit knowledge, the life cycle and international manufacturing transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329708524276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjimichael, D., & Tsoukas, H. (2019). Toward a better understanding of tacit knowledge in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 672–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, C. V. U., Page, C. M., Pitsis, S. T., Rivas, L. J., & Yu, F. K. (2017). Measuring and achieving scholarly impact: A report from the Academy of Management’s Practice Theme Committee. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Usha-Haley-2/publication/321921311_Measuring_and_Achieving_Scholarly_Impact_A_Report_from_the_Academy_of_Management%27s_Practice_Theme_Committee/links/5a399cafa6fdcc34776a3588/Measuring-and-Achieving-Scholarly-Impact-A-Report-from-the-Academy-of-Managements-Practice-Theme-Committee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2016). University knowledge exchange (KE) framework: Good practice in technology transfer. Report to the UK higher education sector and HEFCE by the McMillan Group. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329608524237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, T., Webber, D., & O’Regan, N. (2019). Achieving wider impact in business and management: Analysing the case studies from REF 2014. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 628–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1393059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, BÅ. (2002). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., & Orr, K. (2020). What is business school research for? Academic and stakeholder perspectives, politics and relationality. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 557–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellard, N., & Sliwa, M. (2016). Business and management impact assessment in research excellence framework 2014: Analysis and reflection. British Journal of Management, 27(4), 693–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as The source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntosh, R., Beech, N., Bartunek, J., Mason, K., Cooke, B., & Denyer, D. (2017). Impact and Management research: Exploring relationships between temporality, dialogue, reflexivity and praxis. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2017). Government research evaluations and academic freedom: A UK and Australian comparison. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 372–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B., & Tang, P. (2007). The benefits of publicly funded research. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series no.161. Retrieved October 9, 2017, from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=sewp161.pdf&site=25
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., Mason, B., & McCrory, J. (2007). Exploring the dichotomies within the tacit knowledge literature: Towards a process of tacit knowing in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710738906
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V.-W. (2019). A proposed framework and tool for non-economic research impact measurement. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 819–832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1590319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V.-W., & Harvey, W. S. (2018). How preferable and possible is management research-related teaching impact? Management Learning, 49(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618770755
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. W., Lennard, D., & McGoldrick, P. (2003). Consumer awareness, understanding and usage of unit pricing. British Journal of Management, 14(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. W., Moutinho, L., & Lewis, B. R. (2003). Risk reduction in purchasing organisational professional services. The Service Industries Journal, 23(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060308565621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeen, M., & Agarwal, R. (2017). Incubation of an industry: Heterogeneous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 566–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, S. (2015). Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approach. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ba: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41165942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Gabbard, J. (2018). Factors that affect scientists’ knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities: Differences between explicit and implicit knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 326–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, S., Ioppolo, B., Stepanek, M., & Gunashekar, S. (2018). Guidance for standardising quantitative indicators of impact within REF case studies. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., & Fini, R. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plsek, P., Bibby, J., & Whitby, E. (2007). Practical methods for extracting explicit design rules grounded in the experience of organizational managers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297013
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1962). Tacit knowing. Philosophy Today, 6(4), 239–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday19626427
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy (London, England), 41(155), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100066110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1997). Tacit knowledge. Chapter 7 in Knowledge in Organizations, Laurence Prusak, Editor. Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M., & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzali, A., & Viale, R. (2006). Cognition, types of tacit knowledge and technology transfer. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 280, 205–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(06)80010-6
   Google Scholar
• Puteh, F. (2018). Measuring tacit knowledge: A deliberate construct validation using structural equation modelling. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 17(03), 1850025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649218500259
   Google Scholar
• Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work? Human Relations, 70(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507619860854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Ferré, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Blanche, R., Lawford-Rolfe, R., Dallimer, M., & Holden, J. (2020). Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework. Research Policy, 50(4), article number 104147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104147
   Google Scholar
• REF. (2014). Research excellence framework impact. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from https://re.ukri.org/research/ref-impact/
   Google Scholar
• Romme, A., Georges, L., Marie-José, A., Denyer, D., Hodgkinson, G., Pandza, K., Starkey, K., & Worren, N. (2015). Towards common ground and trading zones in management research and practice. British Journal of Management, 26(3), 544–559. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/3069460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. E., Blasinsky, M., Dufour, M., Mandai, R. J., & Philogene, G. S. (2011). An evaluation of the mind-body interactions and health program: Assessing the impact of an NIH program using the payback framework. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sealy, R., Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., Terjesen, S., Anderson, D., & Atewologun, D. (2017). Expanding the notion of dialogic trading zones for impactful research: The case of women on boards research. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaapen, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., Eden, C., Bessant, J., & Ellwood, P. (2011). Rigour, relevance and reward: Introducing the knowledge translation value-chain. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 420–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00760.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2005). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, P., & Pillai, R. (2019). Management research outcome: A comparative assessment of BRICS nations. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1567–1578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1455083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 902–921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., & Chubb, J. (2019). Evaluating ‘impact’in the UK’s research Excellence Framework (REF): liminality, looseness and new modalities of scholarly distinction. Studies in Higher Education, 44(9), 1554–1566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1455082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C. (2019). Evidencing impact: A case study of UK academic perspectives on evidencing research impact. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1339028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcott, G., Keast, R., & Pickernell, D. (2020). Deep impact: Re-conceptualising university research impact using human cultural accumulation theory. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1197–1216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1594179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar