Doctoral supervision: sharpening the focus of the practice lens

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Supervising doctoral students: Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1686–1698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2013). Consuming the other: Whiteness, education, and cheap French fries. In M. Apple (Ed.), Knowledge, power and education: Selected works of Michael Apple (pp. 186–194). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2010). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/589357
   Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. (2009). Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2008). The education debate. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903131214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. (2017). Content and context in knowledge production: A critical review of doctoral supervision literature. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1145–1157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boberg, I., & Devine, N. (2016). Ignorance and intensity: Becoming through the doctoral thesis. Knowledge Cultures, 4(1), 100–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bøgelund, P. (2015). How supervisors perceive PhD supervision – and how they practice it. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 39–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/2096
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2008). Changing practices of doctoral education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. (2001). The nature of research: Inquiry in academic contexts. RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Buirski, N. (2021). ‘Ways of being’: A model for supportive doctoral supervisory relationships and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1910209
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. M., Lhussier, M., & Chandler, C. (2010). The supervision of professional doctorates: Experiences of the processes and ways forward. Nurse Education Today, 30(4), 279–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. (2007). Representing the complexity, diversity and particularity of the doctoral enterprise in Australia [PhD thesis, Australian National University]. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/46612
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. (2008). Representing doctoral practice in the laboratory sciences. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 113–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. (2010). Contextualised performance: Reframing the skills debate in research education. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903082342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. (2013). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or survive. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Dolin, J. (2016). Concerns with using test results for political and pedagogical purposes: A Danish perspective. In S. Scott, D. E. Scott, & C. F. Webber (Eds.), Assessment in education, implications for leadership (pp. 91–112). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doloriert, C., Sambrook, S., & Stewart, J. (2012). Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 732–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255566
   Google Scholar
• Eisenbach, B. (2013). Finding a balance: A narrative inquiry into motherhood and the doctoral process. The Qualitative Report, 18(34), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. L., & Kobayashi, S. (2019). How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures? Teaching in Higher Education, 24(8), 911–929. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Stevenson, K. (2011). The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the U.K: A qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-10-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant, B. M. (2005). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B., & McKinley, E. (2011). Colouring the pedagogy of doctoral supervision: Considering supervisor, student and knowledge through the lens of indigeneity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.617087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. A., & Crosta, L. (2018). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. F. (2018). Anticipating doctoral supervision: (Not) bridging the transition from supervisee to supervisor. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1382466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holligan, C. (2005). Fact and fiction: A case history of doctoral supervision. Educational Research, 47(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500287179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2018). Practice, theory and doctoral education research. In E. Bitzer, L. Frick, M. Fourie-Malherbe, & K. Pyhältö (Eds.), Spaces, journeys and new horizons for postgraduate supervision (pp. 9–25). African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., & McAlpine, L. (2007). Exploring a theoretical framework for understanding doctoral education. ResearchGate. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241088025_Exploring_a_theoretical_framework_for_understanding_doctoral_education
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, A. N., Mair, C. A., & Atkinson, M. P. (2012). Teaching community networks: A case study of informal social support and information sharing among sociology graduate students. Teaching Sociology, 40(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12441714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees’ positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 20(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isike, C. (2018). The impact of University of Zululand structural and cultural contexts on postgraduate supervision practice (2011–2016). Africa Education Review, 15(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1341292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2013). ‘It’s complicated’ relationship: Research students’ perspective on doctoral supervision. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 165–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.078
   Google Scholar
• Jara, M. (2020). Research-based doctoral supervision development programme: Learning through peer learning, reflection and case studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1786433
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, F. (2017). The idea of the PhD: The doctorate in the twenty-first-century imagination. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Wilkinson, J., & Hardy, I. (2012). Ecologies of practices. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (Vol. 8, pp. 33–49). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & Mahon, K. (2017). Practice architectures of university education. In P. Grootenboer, C. Edwards-Groves, & S. Choy (Eds.), Practice theory perspectives on pedagogy and education: Praxis, diversity and contestation (pp. 107–141). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109550
   Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. (2006). Discursive battles about the meaning of university: The case of Danish University reform and its academics. European Educational Research Journal, 5(3–4), 210–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2006.5.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. J. (2009). Professional doctorate supervision: Exploring student and supervisor experiences. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 641–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2008). Framing doctoral education as practice. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 10–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2011). Moments of transculturation and assimilation: Post-colonial explorations of supervision and culture. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.617089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2017). Intercultural doctoral supervision: The centrality of place, time and other forms of knowledge. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 16(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215580119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manidis, M., & Goldsmith, R. (2018). Governing the social, material, textual, and advancing professional learning of doctoral candidates in the contemporary university. Teaching Public Administration, 36(1), 14–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417706428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawson, K., & Abbott, I. (2017). Supervising the professional doctoral student: Less process and progress, more peripheral participation and personal identity. Management in Education, 31(4), 187–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020617738182
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., & Turner, G. (2014). Identity-trajectory: Reframing early career academic experience. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 952–969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453012
   Google Scholar
• Nichol, L., Cook, J., & Ross, C. (2018). Adopting coaching for doctoral supervision: Opportunities and challenges for HRD. Human Resource Development International, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1547038
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, S., & Araújo e Sá, M. H. (2020). Researching across languages and cultures: A study with doctoral students and supervisors at a Portuguese University. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1777449
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorising. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Robinson-Pant, A. (2009). Changing academies: Exploring international PhD students’ perspectives on ‘host’ and ‘home’ universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 417–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903046876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K., & Kemmis, S. (2016). Stirring doctoral candidates into academic practices: A doctoral course and its practice architectures. Education Inquiry, 7(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27558
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, L., & Grootenboer, P. (2016). Student engagement and educational rapport in higher education. Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2003). A new societist social ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(2), 174–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103033002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organisations. Organisation Studies, 26(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2016). Practice theory as flat ontology. In G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, & M. Lamers (Eds.), Practice theory and research: Exploring the relevance for social change (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, S. (2014). Finding the academic self: Identity development of academics as doctoral students. Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 79(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v79i1.2114
   Google Scholar
• Sikanadar, A. (2018). A critical discourse analysis of research consultations in higher education: A case of language ideological norm [PhD thesis, Institute of Business Management]. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from https://www.iobm.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Aliya-Tahir.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skakni, I. (2018). Doctoral studies as an initiatory trial: Expected and taken-for-granted practices that impede PhD students’ progress. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 927–944. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: The doctoral student experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.651449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P. (2020). Accomplishing change in teaching and learning regimes: Higher education and the practice sensibility. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2001). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436022000020742
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2016). International students in transition: Voices of Chinese doctoral students in a U.S. research university. Journal of International Students, 6(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v6i1.487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar