Contribution of open-ended questions in student evaluation of teaching

References

• Alhija, F. N.-A., & Fresko, B. (2009). Student evaluation of instruction: What can be learned from students’ written comments? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Altrabsheh, N., Cocea, M., & Fallahkhair, S. (2014). Learning sentiment from students’ feedback for real-time interventions in classrooms. Adaptive and Intelligent Systems ICAIS, 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Balam, E., & Shannon, D. (2010). Student ratings of college teaching: A comparison of faculty and their students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902795901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919873106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902898664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Laferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning 113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4/5), 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301683
   Google Scholar
• Denson, N., Loveday, T., & Dalton, H. (2010). Student evaluation of courses: What predicts satisfaction? Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903394466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Halees, A. (2011). Mining opinions in user-generated content to improve course evaluation. In J. M. Zain, W. M. Wan Mohd, & E. El-Qawasmeh (Eds.), ICSECS 2011. CCIS, vol. 180 (pp. 107–115). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira-Melo, R., André, M., Pinheiro, A., Costa, E., & Romero, C. (2019). Text mining in education WIREs. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 9(6), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gethers, M., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2010). Using relational topic models to capture coupling among classes in object-oriented software systems. In Software Maintenance (ICSM), 2010 IEEE International Conference. IEEE:1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Gottipati, S., Shankararaman, V., & Lin, J. R. (2018). Text analytics approach to extract course improvement suggestions from students’ feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0073-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene, D., & Cross, J. P. (2015). Unveiling the political agenda of the European Parliament Plenary: A topical analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference. 2015. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, B. (2001). Instructor reputation and student ratings of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, L. C., & Stanton, K. (2006). Translating comments on student evaluations into the language of learning. Innovations in Higher Education, 31(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9027-3
   Google Scholar
• Idrissi, N., & Zellou, A. (2020). A systematic literature review of sparsity issues in recommender systems. Social Network. Analysis and Mining, 1, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-0626-2
   Google Scholar
• Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, C., Feng, X., Jiang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: Models, applications, a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(11), 15169–15211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A. (2001). Student ratings: Validity, utility and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(109), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.1
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. G. (2001). Making sense of student-written comments. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 87(87), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.25
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., McKeachie, W. J., & Tucker, D. G. (1984). The use of student ratings in promotion decisions. Journal of Higher Education, 55(5), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazarura, J., & de Waal, A. (2016). A comparison of the performance of latent Dirichlet allocation and the Dirichlet multinomial mixture model on short text. 2016 Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa and Robotics and Mechatronics International Conference (PRASA-RobMech), Stellenbosch, 2016:1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ming, N., & Ming, V. (2012). Predicting student outcomes from unstructured data. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization.
   Google Scholar
• Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2009). Student evaluation of instruction: What can be learned from students’ written comments? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Newman, H., & Joyner, D. (2018). Sentiment analysis of student evaluations of teaching. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10948, 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_45
   Google Scholar
• Pan, D., Tan, G. S. H., Ragupathi, K., Booluck, K., Roop, R., & Ip, Y. K. (2009). Profiling teacher/teaching using descriptors derived from qualitative feedback: Formative and summative applications. Research in Higher Education, 50(1), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9109-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, A. R., & Coe, R. (2004). Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 215–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074002215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyasi, S., Gottipati, S., & Shankararaman, V. (2018). SUFAT - An analytics tool for gaining insights from student feedback comments. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
   Google Scholar
• Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., Johnson, A. M., Balyan, M., Kopp, K., McNamara, D., … Trausan-Matu, S. (2018). Predicting question quality using recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2018, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_36
   Google Scholar
• Shankararaman, V., Gottipati, S., Lin, J., & Gan, R. S. (2017). Extracting implicit suggestions from students’ comments – A text analytics approach. Research Collection School of Computing and Information Systems, 261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, B. (2012). Computing student science conceptions with Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching the state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupans, I., McGuren, T., & Babey, A. M. (2016). Student evaluation of teaching: A study exploring student rating instrument free-form text comments. Innovation in High Education, 41(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9328-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D. (2001). Encouraging your students to give feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.24
   Google Scholar
• Symons, R. L. (2006). Listening to the student's voice at the University of Sydney: closing the loop in the quality enhancement and improvement cycle Paper presented at the 2006 Australian Association for Institutional Research (AAIR) Forum, Coffs Harbor, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H., Shen, L., i, Y. Q., Chen, Y., Shu, Y., Li, J., & Clausi, D. A. (2013). A multiscale latent Dirichlet allocation model for object-oriented clustering of VHR panchromatic satellite images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(3), 1680–1692. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2205579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobarra, L., Robles-Gómez, A., Ros, S., Hernández, R., & Caminero, A. C. (2014). Analyzing the students’ behavior and relevant topics in virtual learning communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Pan, X., Miller, K. F., & Cortina, K. S. (2014). Automatic classification of activities in classroom discourse. Computers & Education, 78, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., & Li, S. (2016). Analyzing academic discussion forum data with topic detection and data visualization. IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2016.7851779
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., & Kim, J. (2014). Can online discussion participation predict group project performance? Investigating the roles of linguistic features and participation patterns. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Chen, M., Huang, D., Wu, D., & Li, Y. (2017). Idoctor: Personalized and professionalized medical recommendations based on hybrid matrix factorization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 66, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar