607
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transforming higher education spaces through ethical research publication: a critique of the publish or perish aphorism

Pages 186-199 | Received 23 Feb 2021, Accepted 18 Jan 2022, Published online: 13 Mar 2022

References

  • Ahn, C. S., Li, R. J., Ahn, B. S., Kuo, P., Bryant, J., & Day, C. S. (2012). Hand and wrist research productivity in journals with high impact factors: A 20 year analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 37, ), 275–283.
  • Anderson, G. (2017). How education researchers have colluded in the rise of neoliberalism: What should the role of academics be in these Trumpian times? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(10), 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1312600
  • Baruch, Y. (2001). Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111010
  • Beauchamp, T. (2019). The principle of beneficence in applied ethics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Retrieved January 24, 2021, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/principle-beneficence/
  • Brown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654
  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
  • Bülow, W., & Helgesson, G. (2019). Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9865-7
  • Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Sage.
  • Collyer, F. M. (2018). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, Global south. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020
  • Colpaert, J. (2012). The ‘publish and perish’ syndrome. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.735101
  • Confraria, H., Godinho, M. M., & Wang, L. L. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global north. Research Policy, 46(1), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.004
  • Corneille, M., Lee, A., Allen, S., Cannady, J., & Guess, A. (2019). Barriers to the advancement of women of color faculty in STEM: The need for promoting equity using an intersectional framework. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(3), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0199
  • Dade, K., Tartakov, C., Hargrave, C., & Leigh, P. (2015). Assessing the impact of racism on black faculty in white academe: A collective case study of African American female faculty. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 39(2), 134–146.
  • Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 1–14.
  • De Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish – bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492605276850
  • Desierto, A., & De Maio, C. (2020). The impact of neoliberalism on academics and students in higher education: A call to adopt alternative philosophies. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 14(2), 148–159.
  • Dilts, A. (2011). From entrepreneur of the self to care of the self: Neoliberal governmentality and Foucault’s ethics. Foucault Studies, 12, 130–146. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i12.3338
  • Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5738. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0005738 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
  • Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
  • Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. L. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research: A social justice perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 5(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.5.2.69-83
  • Figueroa, A. M. (2016). Citizenship, beneficence, and informed consent: The ethics of working in mixed-status families. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.974722
  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Palgrave Macmillan. (Original work published 1979)
  • Frazier, K. H. (2011). Academic bullying: A barrier to tenure and promotion for African American faculty. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 5(1), 1–13.
  • Garfield, E. (1996). What is the primordial reference for the phrase ‘publish or perish’? [Commentary]. The Scientist, 10(12), 11–12. Retrieved January 22, 2021, from http://the-scientist.com/17052
  • Gribling, M., & Duberley, J. (2021). Global competitive pressures and career ecosystems: Contrasting the performance management systems in UK and French business schools. Personnel Review, 50(5), 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2019-0250
  • Grossi, G., Dobija, D., & Strzelczyk, W. (2020). The impact of competing institutional pressures and logics on the use of performance measurement in hybrid universities. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(4), 818–844. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1684328
  • Head, G. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315
  • Heron, M., Gravett, K., & Yakovchuk, N. (2021). Publishing and flourishing: Writing for desire in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773770
  • Hyslop-Margison, E., & Sears, A. (2006). Neo-liberalism, ideology and education. In E. Hyslop-Margison, & A. Sears (Eds.), Neo-liberalism, globalization and human capital learning: Reclaiming education for democratic society (pp. 1–24). Springer.
  • Kalfa, S., & Taksa, L. (2017). Employability, managerialism, and performativity in higher education: A relational perspective. Higher Education, 74(4), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0072-2
  • Kallio, K. M., Kallio, T. J., & Grossi, G. (2017). Performance measurement in universities: Ambiguities in the use of quality vs. Quantity in indicators. Public Money & Management, 37(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735
  • Kelly, M. (2013). Foucault, subjectivity, and technologies of the self. In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), Companion to foucault (pp. 510–525). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Klikauer, T. (2015). What is managerialism? Critical Sociology, 41(7–8), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513501351
  • Kovach, M. (2009). Doing indigenous research in a good way: Ethics and reciprocity. In M. Kovach (Ed.), Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts (pp. 141–155). University of Toronto Press.
  • Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
  • Lee, I. (2014). Publish or perish: The myth and reality of academic publishing. Language Teaching, 47(2), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000504
  • Le Grange, L. (2019). On ‘predatory’ publishing: A reply to maistry. Journal of Education, (75), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i75a02
  • Li, Y. (2016). Publish SCI papers or no degree: Practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1005050
  • Lincoln, Y. S. (2012). The political economy of publication: Marketing, commodification, and qualitative scholarly work. Qualitative Health Research, 22(11), 1451–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312457713
  • McGregor, H. E., & Marker, M. (2018). Reciprocity in indigenous educational research: Beyond compensation, towards decolonizing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 49(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12249
  • Miriti, M. N. (2020). The elephant in the room: Race and STEM diversity. BioScience, 70(3), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz167
  • Moosa, I. A. (2018). Publish or perish: Perceived benefits versus unintended consequences. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Morson, G. S. (2003). The aphorism: Fragments from the breakdown of reason. New Literary History, 34(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2003.0035
  • Overton-de Klerk, N., & Sienaert, M. (2016). From research excellence to brand relevance: A model for higher education reputation building. South African Journal of Science, 112(Number 5/6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150365
  • Pieper, I., & Thomson, C. J. (2016). Beneficence as a principle in human research. Monash Bioethics Review, 34(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-016-0061-3
  • Resnik, D. (2014). Data fabrication and falsification and empiricist philosophy of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9466-z
  • Samadova, O. I. K. (2020). Comparative linguistic analysis of Uzbek and English aphorisms. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 1(3), 1035–1039.
  • Shaghaei, N., Wien, C., Holck, J. P., Thiesen, A. L., Ellegaard, O., Vlachos, E., & Drachen, T. M. (2018). Being a deliberate prey of a predator: Researchers’ thoughts after having published in predatory journal. Liber Quarterly, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10259
  • Shapiro, H. (2020). Politics under erasure: A post-Foucauldian reconsideration of neoliberalism in higher education. Philosophy of Education Yearbook (pp. 524–537). Philosophy of Education Society. https://educationjournal.web.illinois.edu/ojs/index.php/pes/article/view/345/231
  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
  • Ssentongo, J. S., & Draru, M. C. (2018). Justice and the dynamics of research and publication in Africa: Interrogating the performance of ‘publish or perish’. In J. S. Ssentongo (Ed.), Decolonisation pathways: Postcoloniality, globalisation, and African development (pp. 48–88). Uganda Martyrs University Book Series.
  • Thelwall, M., Bailey, C., Makita, M., Sud, P., & Madalli, D. P. (2019). Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality? Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.003
  • Topaler, B., & Ayvaz-Çavdaroglu, N. (2021). Understanding the relationship between university characteristics and prestige. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2166
  • Trainor, A. A., & Bouchard, K. A. (2013). Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.724467
  • Von Solms, R., & Von Solms, B. (2016). Publish or perish – But where? South African Computer Journal, 28(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v28i1.394
  • Vurayai, S., & Ndofirepi, A. P. (2020). Publish or perish’: Implications for novice African university scholars in the neoliberal era. African Identities, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.181308
  • Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.