3,525
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The higher degree research student experience in Australian universities: a systematic literature review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1608-1623 | Received 24 May 2022, Accepted 03 Feb 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

References

  • *Abdullah, M. N. L. Y., & Evans, T. (2012). The relationships between postgraduate research students’ psychological attributes and their supervisors’ supervision training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 788–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.142
  • *Ai, B. (2017). Constructing an academic identity in Australia: An autoethnographic narrative. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1303459
  • *Aitchison, C., & Mowbray, S. (2013). Doctoral women: Managing emotions, managing doctoral studies. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827642
  • Aromataris, E. M. Z. E., & Munn, Z. (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
  • *Bamgboje-Ayodele, A., Ye, M., Almond, H., & Sakulwichitsintu, S. (2016). Inside the minds of doctoral students: Investigating challenges in theory and practice. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 243–267. https://doi.org/10.28945/3542
  • *Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
  • *Beasy, K., Emery, S., & Crawford, J. (2021). Drowning in the shallows: An Australian study of the PhD experience of wellbeing. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1669014
  • Beasy, K., Emery, S., Dyer, L., Coleman, B., Bywaters, D., Garrad, T., Crawford, J., Swarts, K., & Jahangiri, S. (2020). Writing together to foster wellbeing: Doctoral writing groups as spaces of wellbeing. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 109–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1713732
  • Bendix Petersen, E. (2012). Re-signifying subjectivity? A narrative exploration of ‘non-traditional’ doctoral students' lived experience of subject formation through two Australian cases. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 823–834. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.745337
  • *Berridge, S. (2008). What does It take? Auto/biography as performative PhD thesis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.2.379
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  • *Chapman, A., & Pyvis, D. (2005). Identity and social practice in higher education: Student experiences of postgraduate courses delivered ‘offshore’ in Singapore and Hong Kong by an Australian university. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.05.003
  • *Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral pedagogy: What do international PhD students in Australia think about it? Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(2), 521–534. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2019%20(2)%20Sep.%202011%20(View%20Full%20Journal).pdf
  • *Cotterall, S. (2015). The rich get richer: International doctoral candidates and scholarly identity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839124
  • *Crossman, J. (2005). Work and learning: The implications for Thai transnational distance learners. International Education Journal, 6(1), 18-29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854952.pdf
  • *Cumming, J. (2009). The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy. British Educational Research Journal, 35(6), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834191
  • Dai, K., & Hardy, I. (2021). The micro-politics of cultural change: a Chinese doctoral student’s learning journey in Australia. Oxford Review of Education, 47, 243–259.
  • *Davis, D. (2019). Students’ perceptions of supervisory qualities: What do students want? What do they believe they receive? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 431-464. https://doi.org/10.28945/4361
  • Department of Education and Training. (2018). Research Training Implementation Plan Progress Report. July 2018. https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-reviews-and-consultations/resources/rtip-progress-report-july-2018
  • DESE. (2019). 2019 Higher degree by research student population of Australian universities. https://www.dese.gov.au/download/4100/2019-higher-degree-research-student-population/6075/document/pdf
  • DESE. (2020). Enrolments time series, student enrolments by equity groups. https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/student-data/selected-higher-education-statistics-2020-student-data-0
  • *Devenish, R., Dyer, S., Jefferson, T., Lord, L., van Leeuwen, S., & Fazakerley, V. (2009). Peer to peer support: The disappearing work in the doctoral student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444362
  • *Dickie, C. (2011). Winning the PhD game: Evocative playing of snakes and ladders. Qualitative Report, 16(5), 1230–1244. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941701.pdf
  • *Due, C., Zambrano, S. C., Chur-Hansen, A., Turnbull, D., & Niess, C. (2015). Higher degree by research in a foreign country: A thematic analysis of the experiences of international students and academic supervisors. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032002
  • *Fotovatian, S., & Miller, J. (2014). Constructing an institutional identity in university tea rooms: The international PhD student experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832154
  • *Fung, A. S. K., Southcott, J., & Siu, F. (2017). Exploring mature-aged students’ motives for doctoral study and their challenges: A cross border research collaboration. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 175–195. https://doi.org/10.28945/3790
  • *Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2015). ‘They’re the bosses’: Feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
  • *Halbert, K. (2015). Students’ perceptions of a ‘quality’ advisory relationship. Quality in Higher Education, 21(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1049439
  • *Harman, G. (2003a). International PhD students in Australian universities: Financial support, course experience and career plans. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00054-8
  • *Harman, G. (2003b). Phd student satisfaction with course experience and supervision in two Australian research-intensive universities. Prometheus, 21(3), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0810902032000113460
  • *Harman, K. (2002). The research training experiences of doctoral students linked to Australian cooperative research centres. Higher Education, 44(3/4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019894323421
  • *Hutchings, K., Bodle, K., & Miller, A. (2018). Opportunities and resilience: Enablers to address barriers for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to commence and complete higher degree research programs. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2, 29–49. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316informit.106269539902101
  • *Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. Students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
  • *Jones, A., & Blass, E. (2019). The impact of institutional power on higher degree research supervision: Implications for the quality of doctoral outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070702
  • *Jowsey, T., Corter, A., & Thompson, A. (2020). Are doctoral theses with articles more popular than monographs? Supervisors and students in biological and health sciences weigh up risks and benefits. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1693517
  • *Kefford, G., & Morgenbesser, L. (2013). Bridging the information gap: A survey of politics and international relations PhD students in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.840431
  • *Klenowski, V., Ehrich, L., Kapitzke, C., & Trigger, K. (2011). Building support for learning within a doctor of education programme. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.570431
  • Lasen, M., Evans, S., Tsey, K., Campbell, C., & Kinchin, I. (2018). Quality of WIL assessment design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1450359
  • Lee, E., Blackmore, C., & Seal, E. (2013). Research journeys: A collection of narratives of the doctoral experience. Cambridge Scholars.
  • Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004
  • *Ma, L. P. F. (2021). Writing in English as an additional language: Challenges encountered by doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1809354
  • Macoun, A., & Miller, D. (2014). Surviving (thriving) in academia: Feminist support networks and women ECRs. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014.909718
  • *Maher, D., Seaton, L., McMullen, C., Fitzgerald, T., Otsuji, E., & Lee, A. (2008). ‘Becoming and being writers': The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370802439870
  • *Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., & Critchley, C. (2009). Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: Tracking PhD graduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955945
  • *Mantai, L. (2019). ‘A source of sanity': The role of social support for doctoral candidates’ belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
  • *Mason, S. (2018). Publications in the doctoral thesis: Challenges for doctoral candidates, supervisors, examiners and administrators. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1231–1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1462307
  • *Mason, S., Morris, J. E., & Merga, M. K. (2021). Institutional and supervisory support for the thesis by publication. Australian Journal of Education, 65(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120929065
  • McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011). To be or not to be? The challenges of learning academic work. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 1–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4
  • McGagh, J., Marsh, H., Western, M., Thomas, P., Hastings, A., Mihailova, M., … Wenham, M. (2016). Review of Australia’s Research Training System. Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA).
  • *Merga, M. K. (2015). Thesis by publication in education: An autoethnographic perspective for educational researchers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 291–308. http://www.iier.org.au/iier25/merga.pdf
  • Merga, M. K., Mason, S., & Morris, J. E. (2019). ‘The constant rejections hurt’: Skills and personal attributes needed to successfully complete a thesis by publication. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1245
  • *Merga, M. K., Mason, S., & Morris, J. E. (2020). ‘What do I even call this?’ challenges and possibilities of undertaking a thesis by publication. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9), 1245–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1671964
  • *Morris, S., Pitt, R., & Manathunga, C. (2012). Students’ experiences of supervision in academic and industry settings: Results of an Australian study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557715
  • *Naylor, R., Chakravarti, S., & Baik, C. (2016). Differing motivations and requirements in PhD student cohorts: A case study. Issues in Educational Research, 26(2), 351–367. http://www.iier.org.au/iier26/naylor.pdf
  • *Nguyen, B. T. T., & Pennycook, A. (2018). Dancing, google and fish sauce: Vietnamese students coping with Australian universities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1493981
  • *Nomnian, S. (2017). Thai PhD students and their supervisors at an Australian university: Working relationship, communication, and agency. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 53, 26–58. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153678.pdf
  • *Owens, A., Brien, D. L., Ellison, E., & Batty, C. (2020). Student reflections on doctoral learning: Challenges and breakthroughs. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 11(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-04-2019-0048
  • *Parker, R. (2009). A learning community approach to doctoral education in the social sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802602533
  • *Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322
  • *Robertson, M. (2017). Aspects of mentorship in team supervision of doctoral students in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4-5), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0241-z
  • *Ross, P. M., Burgin, S., Aitchison, C., & Catterall, J. (2011). Research writing in the sciences: Liminal territory and high emotion. Journal of Learning Design, 4(3), 14–27. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ940645.pdf
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
  • *Satariyan, A., Getenet, S., Gube, J., & Muhammad, Y. (2015). Exploring supervisory support in an Australian university: Perspectives of doctoral students in an education faculty. Journal of the Australia and New Zealand Student Services Association, 46, 1–12. https://www.anzssa.com/public/94/files/JANZSSA%20editions/JANZSSA%20October%202015_Number%2046.pdf
  • *Shen, C. (2008). Chinese research students’ adjustment to the Australian learning environment. International Journal of Learning, 15(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i01/45381
  • *Son, J.-B., & Park, S.-S. (2014). Academic experiences of international PhD students in Australian higher education: From an EAP program to a PhD program. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082017
  • *Stewart, R. A., & Chen, L. (2009). Developing a framework for work integrated research higher degree studies in an Australian engineering context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902833325
  • *Stylianou, M., Enright, E., & Hogan, A. (2017). Learning to be researchers in physical education and sport pedagogy: The perspectives of doctoral students and early career researchers. Sport, Education and Society, 22(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1244665
  • *Taylor, A., Millei, Z., Partridge, L., & Rodriguez, L. (2004). The getting of access: The trials and tribulations of the novice researcher. Issues In Educational Research, 14(1), 85–102. http://www.iier.org.au/iier14/taylor.html
  • Torka, M. (2020). Change and continuity in Australian doctoral education: PhD completion rates and times (2005-2018). Australian Universities’ Review, 62(2), 69–82. https://aur.nteu.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AUR-62-02.pdf
  • *Trudgett, M. (2009). Build it and they will come: Building the capacity of Indigenous units in universities to provide better support for Indigenous Australian postgraduate students. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1375/S1326011100000545
  • *Trudgett, M. (2011). Western places, academic spaces and Indigenous faces: Supervising Indigenous Australian postgraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560376
  • *Trudgett, M. (2014). Supervision provided to Indigenous Australian doctoral students: A black and white issue. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890576
  • *Usher, W., & McCormack, B. A. (2021). Doctoral capital and well-being amongst Australian PhD students: Exploring capital and habitus of doctoral students. Health Education, 121(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-11-2020-0112
  • Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). “Tell me what to do” vs. “Guide me through it". Feedback Experiences of International Doctoral Students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
  • *Winchester-Seeto, T., Homewood, J., Thogersen, J., Jacenyik-Trawoger, C., Manathunga, C., Reid, A., … Holbrook, A. (2014). Doctoral supervision in a cross-cultural context: Issues affecting supervisors and candidates. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841648
  • *Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V., Sharma, J., Silva, P., Woodman, K., Pitchforth, J., & Mengersen, K. (2018). Factors influencing the success of culturally and linguistically diverse students in engineering and information technology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 1384–1399. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/223993/
  • *Yeoh, J. S. W., D. Thao. (2012). International research students’ perceptions of quality supervision. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1(3), 10–18. https://www.auamii.com/jiir/Vol-01/issue-03/2Yeoh.pdf.
  • Yim, L., & Waters, L. (2013). The role of interpersonal comfort, attributional confidence, and communication quality in academic mentoring relationships. Education Research and Perspectives, 40, 58–85. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/aeipt.203881
  • *Yu, B., & Wright, E. (2016). Socio-cultural adaptation, academic adaptation and satisfaction of international higher degree research students in Australia. Tertiary Education & Management, 22(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2015.1127405
  • *Zeivots, S. (2021). Outsiderness and socialisation bump: First year perspectives of international university research students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1779028