Exploring academics’ beliefs about interdisciplinary research collaboration and their influences on collaborative practices: a mixed-method study in China

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, B. V., & Vilsmaier, U. (2021). Models of transdisciplinary knowledge production at universities: A Romanian case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1910208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumber, A., Kligyte, G., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & Pratt, S. (2019). Learning together: A transdisciplinary approach to student-staff partnerships in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1684454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Parry, S. (2005). The endurance of the disciplines. In I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing Knowledge: A Study of Continuity and Change in Higher Education A Festschrift in Honour of Maurice Kogan (pp. 133–144). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of discipline. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Weger, M., & Schneider, F. D. (1998). Interdisciplinary collaboration in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1998.10778908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossio, D., Loch, B., Schier, M., & Mazzolini, A. (2013). A roadmap for forming successful interdisciplinary education research collaborations: A reflective approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.832167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, J. L. (1972). Role theory, cognitive dissonance theory, and the interdisciplinary team. Interchange, 3(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02145409
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. R. (2003). A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Social Work, 48(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/48.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, G., Loucks, D. P., & Blöschl, G. (2018). Gaining insight into interdisciplinary research and education programmes: A framework for evaluation. Research Policy, 47(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2008). Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460633
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, M. (1997). The new social sciences: Cracks in the disciplinary walls. International Social Science Journal, 49(153), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701382864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, I. (2002). New organizations, old cultures: Strategy and implementation of interdisciplinary programs. Research Evaluation, 11(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. Z., & Worden, E. A. (2016). Creating interdisciplinary space on campus: Lessons from US area studies centers. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1128886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubenthal, U., Bailis, S., & Klein, J. T. (1994). Interdisciplinary thought. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 12, 55–75. http://hdl.handle.net/10323/4145
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (2013). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64(5), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvig, K. (2018). The implied PhD student of interdisciplinary research projects within monodisciplinary structures. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1474343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, P. J., Hine, D., & Barnard, R. T. (2013). Interdisciplinary science research and education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.686482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology-Society (STS) a new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609336307
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S. K., & Gardner, S. K. (2012). Interdisciplinary collaboration on campus: Five questions. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.728953
   Google Scholar
• Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., & Morton, T. (2018). At the German coalface: Interdisciplinary collaboration between anthropology and journalism. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies (US). (2005). Facilitating interdiscplinary research. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H., Wentworth, J., & Sebberson, D. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 19, 1–25. http://hdl.handle.net/10323/4378
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 102–119). Macmillan Library Reference USA, Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sá, C. M. (2008). Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. Research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2020). Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(8), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venturini, T., Jensen, P., & Latour, B. (2015). Fill in the gap: A new alliance for social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P., & Stehr, N. (2000). Practicing interdisciplinarity. University of Toronto press.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., Woelert, P., Millar, V., & O’Connor, K. (2018). From disciplinary excellence to interdisciplinary collaboration: How Australian academics negotiate competing knowledge agendas. In P. Maassen, M. Nerland, & L. Yates (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge in higher education (pp. 49–64). Springer.
   Google Scholar