2,366
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Perceived employability and career readiness among STEM students: does gender matter?

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 267-283 | Received 27 Sep 2022, Accepted 27 Jun 2023, Published online: 04 Sep 2023

References

  • Ananthram, S., & Chan, C. C. A. (2016). Religiosity, spirituality and ethical decision-making: Perspectives from executives in Indian multinational enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3), 843–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9460-5
  • Australian Academy of Science. (2019). Women in STEM decadal plan. AAS.
  • Australian Academy of Science. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on women in the STEM workforce, May. https://www.science.org.au/covid19/women-stem-workforce
  • Bandura, A. (1996). Social cognitive theory of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 2, 5513–5518.
  • Baruch, Y., & Peiperl, M. (2000). The impact of an MBA on graduate careers. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2000.tb00021.x
  • Bennett, D. (2019). Graduate employability and higher education: Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, 31–61. http://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-5/31-61.
  • Bennett, D., Bawa, S., & Ananthram, S. (2021). Gendered differences in perceived employability among higher education students in STEM and non-STEM disciplines. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2020.1871090
  • Bennett, D., Bawa, S., Ananthram, S., & Pitman, S. (2022). Is there a gender difference in STEM students’ perceived employability? Education + Training. 10.1108/ET-01-2021-0029/full/html
  • Bennett, D., Knight, E., & Bell, K. (2020a). Graduate employability and the career thinking of university STEMM students. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1759529
  • Bennett, D., Knight, E., Dockery, A. M., & Bawa, S. (2020b). Pedagogies for employability: Understanding the needs of STEM students through a new approach to employability development. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1847162
  • Berntson, E., & Marklund, S. (2007). The relationship between perceived employability and subsequent health. Work and Stress, 21(3), 279–292.
  • Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3), 329–345.
  • Bolzani, D., Crivellaro, F., & Grimaldi, R. (2021). Highly skilled, yet invisible. The potential of migrant women with a STEMM background in Italy between intersectional barriers and resources. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(6), 2132–2157. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12719
  • Catherine, H., Christianne, C., & Andresse, R. (2010). Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509653.pdf https://www.science.org.au/sites/default/files/rrif-covid19-women-stem-workforce.pdf
  • Coetzee, M. (2014). Measuring student graduateness: Reliability and construct validity of the graduate skills and attributes scale. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890572
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  • Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9232-8
  • DeLotell, P. J., Millam, L. A., & Reinhardt, M. M. (2010). The use of deep learning strategies in online business courses to impact student retention. American Journal of Business Education, 3(12), 49–56.
  • Dockery, A. M., & Bawa, S. (2018). Labour market implications of promoting women’s participation in STEM in Australia. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 21(2), 125–152.
  • Dockery, A. M., Phillimore, J., & Bawa, S. (2021). Changing demand for STEM skills in Australia and gender implications. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 24, 1.
  • Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. (2019). The undergraduate self-perception of employability: Human capital, careers advice, and career ownership. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1387107
  • Ertl, B., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2017). The impact of gender stereotypes on the self-concept of female students in STEM subjects with an under-representation of females. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00703
  • Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th edition). Prentice-Hall.
  • Herman, C. (2015). Returning to STEM: Gendered factors affecting employability for mature women students. Journal of Education and Work, 28(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.887198
  • Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
  • Jo, Y., Lee, J. W., & Lee, D. (2022). Silent but damaging: Exploring the link between Air pollution and vocational and general well-being. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(3), 533–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211054335
  • Johnson, I. Y., & Muse, W. B. (2017). Choice of academic major at a public research university: The role of gender and self-efficacy. Research in Higher Education, 58(4), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9431-1
  • Jones, B., Ruff, C., & Paretti, M. (2013). The impact of engineering identification and stereotypes on undergraduate women's achievement and persistence in engineering. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9222-x
  • Kaleva, S., Pursiainen, J., Hakola, M., Rusanen, J., & Muukkonen, H. (2019). Students’ reasons for STEM choices and the relationship of mathematics choice to university admission. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0196-x
  • Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 249–263.
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
  • Lent, R. W., Ezeofor, I., Morrison, A., Penn, L. T., & Ireland, G. W. (2016). Applying the social cognitive model of career self-management to career exploration and decision-making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.007
  • Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019). The gender Gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students’ career aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4, 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060
  • Malau-Aduli, B. S., Lee, A. Y., Cooling, N., Catchpole, M., Jose, M., & Turner, R. (2013). Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. BMC Medical Education, 13, 1–8.
  • Mancini, T., Caricati, L., Panari, C., & Tonarelli, A. (2015). Personal and social aspects of professional identity. An extension of Marcia's identity status model applied to a sample of university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.06.002
  • Metcalf, H. (2010). Stuck in the pipeline: A critical review of STEM workforce literature. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5070/D462000681
  • Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women's representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005
  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597.
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • O'Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM. Nature Communications, 9(1), 3777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0
  • OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: Aptitude, behaviour, confidence. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229945-en
  • OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality: An uphill battle. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281318-en
  • Office of the Chief Scientist. (2020). Australia’s STEM workforce, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, July. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/australias_stem_workforce_-_final.pdf
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (U.S.). (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education, Dec. A report by the Committee on STEM education of the National Science and Technology Council. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/05/f62/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (U.S.). (2020). Recommendations for strengthening American leadership in industries of the future. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. https://science.osti.gov/-/media/_/pdf/about/pcast/202006/PCAST_June_2020_Report.pdf?la=en&hash=019A4F17C79FDEE5005C51D3D6CAC81FB31E3ABC
  • Professionals Australia (2018). All talk: Gap between policy and practice a key obstacle to gender equity in STEM – 2018 Women in STEM Professions Survey Report. Professionals Australia.
  • Renfrow, D. G., & Howard, J. A. (2013). Social psychology of gender and race. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 491–531). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_17
  • Santos, G. G. (2020). Career boundaries and employability perceptions: An exploratory study with graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1620720
  • Smith, C., Ferns, S., & Russell, L. (2014). Conceptualising and measuring ‘employability’: Lessons from a national OLT project. Proceedings of the Australian Collaborative Education Network (ACEN), 139–148. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58546
  • van Veelen, R., Derks, B., & Endedijk, M. D. (2019). Double trouble: How being outnumbered and negatively stereotyped threatens career outcomes of women in STEM. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150
  • Wang, M. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643–1657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247
  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  • Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458937
  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • WEF. (2017). The Global Gender Gap Report. WEF. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf
  • Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behaviour: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Changing institutional practices (pp. 32–53). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ypulse survey. (2018). The confidence code for girls- The Confidence collapse and why it matters for the next gen. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/588b93f6bf629a6bec7a3bd2/t/5ac39193562fa73cd8a07a89/1522766258986/The+Confidence+Code+for+Girls+x+Ypulse.pdf
  • Zhang, Z., He, W., Park, T.-Y., Xing, Z., & Wu, X. (2022). The effects of between-group pay dispersion. Academy of Management Journal. In press. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2021.0799