Dancing in a red dress: Empowering metaphors of academics’ experiences of the manuscript peer review process

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H., Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Rees, C. S. (2021). The battle-hardened academic: An exploration of the resilience of university academics in the face of ongoing criticism and rejection of their research. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1765743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. (2021). Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W., & Mason, S. (2021). Demystifying the process of scholarly peer-review: An autoethnographic investigation of feedback literacy of two award-winning peer reviewers. Humanities and Social Science Communications, 8, Article 266. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00951-2
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Corkery, J., Hall, K., Jeffries, J., Laskowski, K., Romig, G., Tranell, J., Humble, B. P., & Whitney, A. E. (2015). Shared vulnerability in professional learning: Growing instructional coaches in a culture of PDS partnership. School-University Partnerships, 8(2), 72–78. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085181.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dynel, M. (2020). Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(5), 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-5001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., Llewellyn, S., & Lewabe, J. (2022). Towards a research-engaged teaching profession: Insider reflections on a collaborative approach to developing teachers in Wales as professional enquirers. Practice, 4(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2022.2109987
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of new labour: Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 229–266). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2016). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 86–108). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, F. (2020). The ‘transformative’ power of metaphor: Assessing its unexplored potential at the crossroads between static and dynamic instances. In M. Huang, & L. Holmgreen (Eds.), The language of crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses (pp. 199–229). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., Winstone, N. F., Balloo, K., Heron, M., Hosein, A., Lygo-Baker, S., & Medland, E. (2020). The development of academics’ feedback literacy: Experiences of learning from critical feedback via scholarly peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1686749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, W. (2021). From the HERD editorial desk. HERDSA Connect, 43(3), 21.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K., & Lemon, N. (2022). Peer reviewing journal articles: A duoethnographic exploration of emotion in the digitalised space. In N. Lemon (Ed.), Reflections on valuing wellbeing in higher education (pp. 125–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, I., Byrne, E., Mullally, G., & Sage, C. (2021). Metaphor, sustainability, transformation: Transdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., Peters, M. A., Benade, L., Devine, N., Arndt, S., Forster, D., Gibbons, A., Grierson, E., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Locke, K., Mihaila, R., Stewart, G., & Tesar, M. (2018). Is peer review in academic publishing still working? Open Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2018.1479139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., & Bennett, B. (2016). Enhancing teaching and learning through dialogue: A student and staff partnership model. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1113537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Coutts, R., Fielden, J., Hutchinson, M., Lakeman, R., Mathisen, B., Nasrawi, D., & Phillips, N. (2022). Occupational stress in university academics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2021.1934246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. (2013). Experienced journal reviewers’ perceptions of and engagement with the task of reviewing: An Australian perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(6), 946–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.806441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, A., & Medvedev, K. (2019). Fashion, agency, and empowerment: Performing agency, following script. Bloomsbury Visual Art.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, F., Jordan, J., Merrick, P., & Stubbe, M. (2017). Juicy conceptualizations: Increasing alliance through attending to client metaphoric language. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45(6), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465817000339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, P., & Coleman, M. (1999). Deconstructing hierarchies of oppression and adopting a ‘multiple model’ approach to anti-oppressive practice. Social Work Education, 18(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479911220031
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Mercer, G. (2017). A dialogue between partnership and feminism: Deconstructing power and exclusion in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1391198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardon, L., & Hari, A. (2021). Sensemaking through metaphors: The role of imaginative metaphor elicitation in constructing new understandings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-2/schmitt.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Silbiger, N. J., & Stubler, A. D. (2019). Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ, 7, e8247. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. L., Zanin, A. C., Avalos, B. L., Tracy, S. J., & Town, S. (2021). Collective emotion during collective trauma: A metaphor analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative Health Research, 31(10), 1890–1903. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211011589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking Out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Sword, H. (2017). Air and light and time and space: How successful academics write. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar