Enablers and barriers to program-level assessment planning

References

• Ball, S. J., Junemann, C., & Santori, D. (2017). Networks, globalisation and policy mobility. In Globalisation and education policy mobility (pp. 1–14). Taylor and Francis. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=4838133
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Dawson, P. (2021). What feedback literate teachers do: An empirically-derived competency framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. (2014). Critical approaches to qualitative research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 116–136). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, N., & Newsham-West, R. (2022). Program-level assessment planning in Australia: The considerations and practices of university academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(5), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2134553
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, N., Weir, K., & Newsham-West, R. (2022). Assessment planning at the program-level: A higher education policy review in Australia. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1475–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2061911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2019). Performance-based funding for the Commonwealth grant scheme. Australian Government. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-reviews-and-consultations/resources/final-report-performance-based-funding-commonwealth-grant-scheme
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J., Van der Vleuten, C. P., & Schuwirth, L. W. (2010). A new framework for designing programmes of assessment. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., Govaerts, M., Teunissen, P., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2012). The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskill, G., Chatham-Carpenter, A., & McIntyre, K. (2019). The power of a mission: Transformations of a department culture through social constructionist principles. Innovative Higher Education, 44(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9449-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. W. (2014). Competencies and their assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.917927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva, K. W., Bordage, G., Campbell, C., Galbraith, R., Ginsburg, S., Holmboe, E., & Regehr, G. (2016). Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: From training into practice. Advance Health Science Education: Theory and Practice, 21(4), 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, E. L., & Flores, M. A. (2022). Assessment in higher education: Voices of programme directors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, K. T., & Knaub, A. V. (2018). Seeding long-term, sustainable change in teacher preparation programs: The case of PhysTEC. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(37), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0134-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Gannaway, D., & Hughes, C. (2011). Assessment as an equity issue in higher education: Comparing the perceptions of first year students, course coordinators, and academic leaders. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-010-0008-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M., & Hughes, C. (2010). An investigation of the confidence levels of course/subject coordinators in undertaking aspects of their assessment responsibilities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903221477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., & Smith, E. (2021). Who are faculty assessment leaders? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1983518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, P., & Whitfield, R. (2013). Programme assessment strategies (PASS) evaluation report. Oxford Brookes University. https://www.brad.ac.uk/pass/about/PASS_evaluation_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, K. E., O'Sullivan, P. S., Fitzhenry, K., & Boscardin, C. (2018). Translating theory into practice: Implementing a program of assessment. Academic Medicine, 93(3), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoda, R., & Noble, J. (2017, May 20–28). Becoming agile a grounded theory of agile transitions in practice [paper presentation]. IEEE/ACM 39th international conference on software engineering (ICSE) Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2017.21
   Google Scholar
• Hong, M. (2020). A comparative study of the internationalization of higher education policy in Australia and China (2008–2015). Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 768–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1553154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, R. (2018). Faculty assessment fellows: Shifting from a culture of compliance to a culture of assessment advocacy. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), New directions for institutional research, Vol. 2018 (pp. 105–119). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20259
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J., Jenkins, G., Beatty, S., & Palermo, C. (2017). Designing programmes of assessment: A participatory approach. Medical Teacher, 39(11), 1182–1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1355447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., & Tomas, C. (2017). The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 990–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1217501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorre de St Jorre, T., & Oliver, B. (2018). Want students to engage? Contextualise graduate learning outcomes and assess for employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1339183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. (2016). The global construction of higher education reform. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), Handbook of global education policy (pp. 291–311). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/griffith/detail.action?docID=4427184
   Google Scholar
• Mason, T., & de la Harpe, B. (2020). The state of play of associate deans, learning and teaching, in Australian universities, 30 years on. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3), 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1685944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (2014). Assessment: Getting to the essence (Designing the future, issue 1). Australian Council for Educational Research. http://rd.acer.edu.au/article/getting-to-the-essence-of-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Medland, E. (2019). ‘I'm an assessment illiterate': Towards a shared discourse of assessment literacy for external examiners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(4), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1523363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method Of sampling In qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, J., & Beckett, D. (2010). Educational research: Creative thinking & doing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, C., Gibson, S. J., Dart, J., Whelan, K., & Hay, M. (2017). Programmatic assessment of competence in dietetics: A new frontier. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 117(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2016.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (2020). Mass higher education. In P. N. Teixeira, & J. C. Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 2043–2049). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8905-9_12
   Google Scholar
• Simper, N., Mårtensson, K., Berry, A., & Maynard, N. (2021). Assessment cultures in higher education: Reducing barriers and enabling change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1983770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simper, N., Maynard, N., & Mårtensson, K. (2021). Informal academic networks and the value of significant social interactions in supporting quality assessment practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1277–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1896481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproule, W. (2010). Content anaysis. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods (2nd ed, pp. 323–350). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, C., & Jessop, T. (2019). Struggling and juggling: A comparison of student assessment loads across research and teaching-intensive universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. (2010). Sampling. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods an Australian perspective (2nd ed., pp. 123–150). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trencher, G., Vincent, S., Bahr, K., Kudo, S., Markham, K., & Yamanaka, Y. (2018). Evaluating core competencies development in sustainability and environmental master's programs: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Bradford. (2012). Programme Assessment Strategies (PASS). Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://www.bradford.ac.uk/pass/
   Google Scholar
• Vahed, A., Walters, M. M., & Ross, A. H. A. (2021). Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology. Education Inquiry, 14(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687
   Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Heeneman, S. (2016). On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment. Perspectives on Medical Education, 5(5), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0295-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S., Salines, E., Abdillahi, A., Mason, S., Jadav, A., & Molesworth, C. (2019). Identifying and resolving key institutional challenges in feedback and assessment: A case study for implementing change. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1649513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, K. (2020). Understanding rubrics. In P. Grainger, & K. Weir (Eds.), Facilitating student learning and engagement in higher education through assessment rubrics (pp. 9–23). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, R., & Hartley, P. (2017). Whatever happened to programme assessment strategies? SEDA Educational Developments, 18(1), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, R., & Hartley, P. (2019). Assessment strategy: Enhancement of student learning through a programme focus. In A. Diver (Ed.), Employability via higher education: Sustainability as scholarship (pp. 237–253). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods an Australian perspective (2nd ed., pp. 407–436). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar