Self‐determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design

References

• Anderson , L.W. and Krathwohl , D.R. , eds. 2001 . A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives , New York : Longman .
   Google Scholar
• Bonk , C.J. , Kim , K. and Zeng , T. 2006 . “ Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings ” . In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs , Edited by: Bonk , C.J. and Graham , C.R. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer .
   Google Scholar
• Collis , B. and Van Der Wende , M. 2002 . Models of technology and change in higher education. An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/documenten/ictrapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De George‐Walker , L. , Hafeez‐Baig , A. , Gururajan , R. and Danaher , P.A. 2010 . “ Experiences and perceptions of learner engagement in blended learning environments: The case of an Australian university ” . In Cases on online and blended learning technologies in higher education: Concepts and practices , Edited by: Inoue , Y. 23 – 43 . Hershey, PA : IGI Global .
   Google Scholar
• Garrison , D.R. and Kanuka , H. 2004 . Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education . Internet and Higher Education , 7 (2) : 95 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Gay , L.R. , Mills , G.E. and Airasian , P. 2006 . Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications , (8th ed.) , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Merrill Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Gosper , M. , McNeill , M. , Woo , K. , Phillips , R. , Preston , G. and Gosper , D. 2008 . The impact of web‐based lecture technologies on current and future practices in learning and teaching Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.altc.edu.au/project-impact-webbased-lecture-macquarie-2006
   Google Scholar
• Graham , C.R. 2006 . “ Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions ” . In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs , Edited by: Bonk , C.J. and Graham , C.R. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer .
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann , J. 2006 . “ Why blended learning hasn’t (yet) fulfilled its promises: Answers to those questions that keep you up at night ” . In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs , Edited by: Bonk , C.J. and Graham , C.R. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer .
   Google Scholar
• Hughes , G. 2007 . Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention . Teaching in Higher Education , 12 (3) : 349 – 363 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes , G. and Lewis , L. 2003 . “ Who are successful online learners? Exploring the different learner identities produced in virtual learning environments ” . In Communities of practice. Research proceedings of the 10th Association for Learning Technology conference , Edited by: Cook , J. and McConnell , D. Sheffield, , UK : The University of Sheffield and Sheffield Hallam University. . Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.uel.ac.uk/uelconnect/internal_resources/docs/alt-c2003_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khine , M.S. and Lourdusamy , A. 2003 . Blended learning approach in teacher education: Combining face‐to‐face instruction, multimedia viewing and on‐line discussion . British Journal of Educational Technology , 34 (5) : 671 – 675 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald , J. 2008 . Blended learning and online tutoring , (2nd ed.) , Hampshire, UK : Gower .
   Google Scholar
• Masie , E. 2006 . “ The blended learning imperative ” . In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs , Edited by: Bonk , C.J. and Graham , C.R. San Francisco, CA : Pfeiffer .
   Google Scholar
• Morgan , D.L. 1997 . Focus groups as qualitative research , (2nd ed.) , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Motteram , G. 2006 . ‘Blended’ education and transformation of teachers: A long‐term case study in postgraduate UK higher education. . British Journal of Educational Technology , 37 (1) : 129 – 146 .
   Google Scholar
• Oliver , M. and Trigwell , K. 2005 . Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? . E‐Learning , 2 (1) : 17 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , D.H. and Wasson , J. 2008 . Universal design for learning (UDL) guidelines – Version 1.0 , Wakefield, MA : CAST . Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.cast.org/publications /UDLguidelines/version1.html
   Google Scholar
• Singh , H. and Reed , C. 2001 . A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning , Lexington, MA : Centra Corp . Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.centra.com/download/whitepapers/blendedlearning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swan , K. 2001 . Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses . Distance Education , 22 (2) : 306 – 331 .
   Google Scholar
• Twigg , C.A. 1996 . Is technology a silver bullet? Educom Review, , 31 (2). ) Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://net.educause.edu/apps/er/review/reviewArticles/31228.html
   Google Scholar
• Verkroost , M. , Meijerink , L. , Lintsen , H. and Veen , W. 2008 . Finding a balance of dimensions in blended learning . International Journal on E‐Learning , 7 (3) : 499 – 522 .
   Google Scholar
• York , M. 2004 . Retention, persistence and success in on‐campus higher education, and their enhancement in open and distance learning . Open Learning , 19 (1) : 19 – 32 .
   Google Scholar