Aligning Digital Video Technology with Game Pedagogy in Physical Education

References

• AppBakkers BV. (2017). Video-catch (version 0.1) [iPad software application]. Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, B., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 7–10). Loughborough, UK: University of Technology, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, A., & Jones, B. (2011). Using digital technology to enhance student engagement in physical education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77, 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dartfish. (2017). Dartfish Easy Tag (version 2.1) [iPad application software]. Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com
   Google Scholar
• Davids, K. W., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (2001). The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports. Quest, 53, 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gréhaigne, J. F., Richard, J. F., & Griffin, L. L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., Brooker, R., & Patton, K. (2005). Working towards legitimacy: Two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 3, 213–223.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., & Patton, K. (2005). Two decades of teaching games for understanding: Looking at the past, present, and future. In L. L. Griffin & J. I. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–17). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Gittins, C. (2014). Effects of integrating video-based feedback into a teaching games for understanding soccer unit. Agora Para la Educación Física y el Deporte, 16, 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centered approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19, 278–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Light, R. L. (2015). Questioning for learning in game-based approaches to teaching and coaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 6, 175–190. doi:10.1080/18377122.2015.1051268
   Google Scholar
• Juniu, S. (2011). Pedagogical uses of technology in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(9), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J. H., Dokman, I., & Walinga, W. (2014). Sportspelen. Betekenisvol leren in de onderbouw van het voortgezet onderwijs. [Teaching sportgames. Meaningful learning in the first two years of high school.] Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Lemma uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J., & Knoppers, A. (2015). The role of perceptions of friendships and peers in learning skills in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20, 231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J., van der Kamp, J., Walinga, W., & van Hilvoorde, I. (2014). Dutch elite youth soccer players perceptions of a TGfU-modified game practice. Agora para la educación física y el deporte, 16, 232–254.
   Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J., van Hilvoorde, I., van der Kamp, J., & Walinga, W. (2014, February). Accuracy and reliability of tagging and video feedback to enhance tactical knowledge: Students' perspectives within a TGfU basketball setting. Poster presented at the AIESEP TGfU symposium, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J., & Walinga, W. (2014, February). TGfU in Dutch PE: Integrating methodical notions with digital observation tools. Paper presented at the AIESEP World Congress TGfU symposium, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Koekoek, J., Walinga, W., & Dokman, I. (2009). Understanding baseball in physical education: A methodical approach to enhance learning based on game-like situations. In T. Hopper, J. Butler, & B. Storey (Eds.), TGfU… simply good pedagogy: Understanding a complex challenge(pp. 115–126). Ottawa, ON, Canada: PHE Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Launder, A. G., & Piltz, W. (2013). Play practice: Engaging and developing skilled players from beginner to elite. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L. (2006). Accessing the inner world of children: The use of student drawings in research on children's experiences of game sense. In R. Light (Ed.), Proceedings for the Asia Pacific Conference on Teaching Sport and Physical Education for Understanding (pp. 72–83). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L. (2013). Game sense: Pedagogy for performance, participation and enjoyment. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., Harvey, S., & Mouchet, A. (2014). Improving “at-action” decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 258–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, D., & Chen, S. (2006). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Stamford, CT: Thomson Course Technology PTR.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–342.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Sport and Physical Education. (2008). National standards for initial physical education teacher education. Reston VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Palao, J. M., Hastie, P. A., Cruz, P. G., & Ortega, E. (2015). The impact of video technology on student performance in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24, 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, C. C. (2005). Once more with feeling: Affect and playing with the TGfU model. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 3, 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• Pot, N., Schenk, N., & Van Hilvoorde, I. (2014). School sports and identity formation: Socialisation or selection? European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 484–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyle, B., & Esslinger, K. (2014). Utilizing technology in physical education: Addressing the obstacles of integration. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80, 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. P., Sheehy, D., & Hopper, T. (2013). Modification by adaptation: Proposing another pedagogical principle for TGfU. In A. Ovens, T. Hopper, & J. Butler (Eds.), Complexity thinking in physical education (pp 181–193). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2014). Video tagger (version 1.3) [iPad software application]. Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & van der Mars, H. (2011). Complete guide to sport education (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Sinelnikov, O. A. (2012). Using the iPad in a sport education season. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(1), 39–45. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2012
   Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Law, B., Rymal, A. M., Jenny, O., Hall, C., & McCul-lagh, P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: An applied model for the use of observation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 145–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, B., & Butler, J. (2010). Ecological thinking in TGfU: Understanding games as complex adaptive systems. In J. I. Butler & L. L. Griffin (Eds.), More teaching games for understanding: Moving globally (pp. 139–154), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. W. K., Chow, J. Y., & Davids, K. (2012). “How does TGfU work?”: Examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannehill, D., van der Mars, H., & MacPhail, A. (2015). Building effective physical education programs. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Tearle, P., & Golder, G. (2008). The use of ICT in the teaching and learning of physical education in compulsory education: How do we prepare the workforce of the future? European Journal of Teacher Education, 31, 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., & Stratton, G. (2006). What we are really doing with ICT in physical education: A national audit of equipment, use, teacher attitudes, support, and training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 617–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travassos, B., Vilar, L., Araújo, D., & McGarry, T. (2014). Tactical performance changes with equal vs unequal numbers of players in small-sided football games. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14, 594–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, T., & Connor, S. (2009). The use of digital video in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18, 155–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar