Punitive Restoration and Restorative Justice

Bibliography

• Ashworth, Andrew. “Responsibilities, Rights and Restorative Justice.” British Journal of Criminology 42 (2002): 578–95. doi: 10.1093/bjc/42.3.578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Andrew. “Sentencing.” In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, edited by Mike Maguire, Rod Morgan, and Robert Reiner, 819–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Andrew. Sentencing and Criminal Justice. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Andrew, and Mike Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, John. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, John. “Setting Standards for Restorative Justice.” British Journal of Criminology 42 (2002): 563–77. doi: 10.1093/bjc/42.3.563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Criminal Harms.” In Law and Legal Theory, edited by Thom Brooks, 149–61. Boston: Brill, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Hegel and the Unified Theory of Punishment.” In Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, edited by Thom Brooks, 103–23. Oxford: Blackwell, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “In Defence of Punishment and the Unified Theory of Punishment: A Reply.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2016): 629–38. doi: 10.1007/s11572-014-9348-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Justice as Stakeholding.” In Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions, edited by Krushil Watene and Jay Drydyk, 111–27. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “On F. H. Bradley’s ‘Some Remarks on Punishment’.” Ethics 125 (2014): 223–5. doi: 10.1086/677017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. Punishment. New York: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Punishment: Political, Not Moral.” New Criminal Law Review 14 (2011): 427–38.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Punitive Restoration: Giving the Public a Say on Sentencing.” In Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration, edited by Albert Dzur, Ian Loader, and Richard Sparks, 140–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Punitive Restoration: Rehabilitating Restorative Justice.” Raisons Politiques (2015): 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “The Right to Trial by Jury.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2004): 197–212. doi: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Thom. “Stakeholder Sentencing.” In Popular Punishment: On the Normative Significance of Public Opinion for Penal Theory, edited by Jesper Ryberg and Julian Roberts, 183–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Jenny, and Jacqui Smith. “Cutting Crime and Building Confidence.” In The Purple Book: A Progressive Future for Labour, edited by Robert Philpott, 215–30. London: Biteback, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, Nils. “Conflicts as Property.” In Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, edited by Andrew von Hirsch and Andrew Ashworth, 312–16. Oxford: Hart, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, Francis T., Bonnie S. Fischer, and Brandon K. Applegate. “Public Opinion about Punishment and Corrections.” Crime and Justice 37 (2000): 1–79. doi: 10.1086/652198
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen, Chris, and Carolyn Hoyle. Debating Restorative Justice. Oxford: Hart, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Kathleen. “Mind the Gap: Restorative Justice in Theory and Practice.” In Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?, edited by Andrew von Hirsch, Julian V. Roberts, Anthony Bottoms, Kent Roach, and Mara Schiff, 219–36. Oxford: Hart, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Marilyn, Craig T. Love, Donald S. Shepard, Cheryl B. Peterson, Karen L. White, and Frank B. Hall. “Cost-Effectiveness of Connecticut’s In-Prison Substance Abuse Treatment.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 39 (2004): 69–92. doi: 10.1300/J076v39n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Dignan, James. “Juvenile Justice, Criminal Courts and Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, edited by Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness, 269–91. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Durlauf, Steven N., and Daniel S. Nagin. “Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both Be Reduced?." Criminology and Public Policy 10 (2011): 13–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00680.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, John. “Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective.” In Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch, edited by Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik, 31–52. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Joe, George W., Kevin Knight, D. Dwayne Simpson, Patrick M. Flynn, Janis T. Morey, Norma G. Bartholomew, Michele Staton Tindall, William M. Burdon, Elizabeth A. Hall, Steve S. Martin, and Daniel J. O’Connell. “An Evaluation of Six Brief Interventions That Target Drug-Related Problems in Correctional Populations.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 51 (2012): 9–33. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2012.633020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnstone, Gerry, and Daniel W. Van Ness. “The Meaning of Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, edited by Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness, 5–23. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, Alison. Prisons and Their Moral Performance: A Study of Values, Quality and Prison Life. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lippke, Richard L. Rethinking Imprisonment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, Jennifer J., and Robert Howse. “Institutions for Restorative Justice: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” University of Toronto Law Journal 49 (2009): 355–88. doi: 10.2307/826003
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. F. Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home Office Occasional Paper. London: Home Office, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, Brenda. “Schools and Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, edited by Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness, 325–50. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, Bhikhu. A New Politics of Identity: Political Principles for an Interdependent World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, Deanna M., and Wesley G. Jennings. “Treatment Behind Bars: The Effectiveness of Prison-Based Therapy for Sex Offenders.” Journal of Crime and Justice 35 (2012): 435–50. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2012.662060
   Google Scholar
• Restorative Justice Council. “Standards and Quality.” Accessed June 15, 2017. https://www.restorativejustice.org.uk/standards-and-quality
   Google Scholar
• Restorative Justice Council. What Does the Ministry of Justice RJ Research Tell Us? London: Restorative Justice Council, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, Declan. Accountability in Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council. “Definitive Guidelines.” Accessed June 15, 2017. http://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/publications/?type=publications&s=&cat=definitive-guideline&topic=&year
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, Becca Chapman, E. Colledge, James Dignan, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. Restorative Justice in Practice: The Second Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. Centre for Criminological Research, University of Sheffield, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, Becca Chapman, James Dignan, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. Restorative Justice: The Views of Victims and Offenders. London: Ministry of Justice, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, Joanna, Anne Atkinson, Helen Atkinson, James Dignan, Lucy Edwards, Jeremy Hibbert, Marie Howes, Jennifer Johnstone, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. Does Restorative Justice Affect Reconviction? The Fourth Report from the Evaluation of Three Schemes. London: Ministry of Justice, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, Joanna, Gwen Robinson, and Angela Sorsby. Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders. New York: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, Michael. “Less Imprisonment Is No Doubt a Good Thing: More Policing Is Not.” Criminology and Public Policy 10 (2011): 137–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00692.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towl, Graham J. “Drug-Misuse Intervention Work.” In Psychological Research in Prisons, edited by Graham J. Towl, 116–27. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness, Daniel W. “Prisons and Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, edited by Gerry Johnstone and Daniel W. Van Ness, 312–24. New York: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew, and Andrew Ashworth. Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Monica. “Beyond the Retributive Public: Governance and Public Opinion on Penal Policy.” Journal of Crime and Justice 35 (2011): 93–113 doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2011.631414
   Google Scholar
• Zemring, Franklin E., Gordon Hawkins, and Sam Kamin. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You’re Out in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar