AI Challenges and the Inadequacy of Human Rights Protections

Bibliography

• Balkin, Jack M. “The Path of Robotics Law.” California Law Review Circuit 6(2015): 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett Moses, Lyria. “Regulating in the Face of Sociotechnical Change.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology, edited by Roger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, and Karen Yeung, 573–596. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsword, Roger. “In the Year 2061: From Law to Technological Management.” Law, Innovation and Technology 7, no. 1(2015): 1–51. doi:10.1080/17579961.2015.1052642
   Google Scholar
• Calo, Ryan. “Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw.” California Law Review 103 (2015): 513–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calo, Ryan. “Robots as Legal Metaphors.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 30, no. 1 (2016): 209–237.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, Andrew. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Julie. “Affording Fundamental Rights.” Critical Analysis of Law 4, no. 1 (2017): 78–90.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. The Social Control of Technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, John. “Axiological Futurism: The Systematic Study of the Future of Human Values.” 2020. Available on PhilArchive. https://philpapers.org/rec/DANAFT-2
   Google Scholar
• Dershowitz, Alan. Rights from Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights. New York: Basic Books, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Owen. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Glendon, Mary Ann. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hvistendahl, Mara. 2017. “Inside China’s Vast New Experiment in Social Ranking.” WIRED, 14 December. https://www.wired.com/story/age-of-social-credit/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Steven. Where Good Ideas Come From: The Seven Patterns of Innovation. London: Penguin, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, David. The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. “The Law of the Horse: What Cyber Law Might Teach.” Harvard Law Review 113 (1999): 501–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsas, George. “The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy.” In Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, edited by Andreas Føllesdal, Birgit Peters, and Geir Ulfstein, 106–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan. “Refining Responsibility: Differentiating Two Types of Responsibility Issues Raised by Autonomous Weapons Systems.” In Autonomous Weapons Systems – Law, Ethics Policy, edited by Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiβ, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kreß, 325–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan. “The Digital Disruption of Human Rights Foundations.” In Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law: A Research Companion, edited by Mart Susi, 75–86. London: Routledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan. “The Power Structure of Artificial Intelligence.” Law, Innovation and Technology 10, no. 2 (2018): 197–229.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan. “Three Types of Structural Discrimination Introduced by Autonomous Vehicles.” UC Davis Law Review Online 51 (2018): 149–180.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan, Kristian Cedervall Lauta, and Matthijs Michiel Maas. “Governing Boring Apocalypses: A New Typology of Existential Vulnerabilities and Exposures for Existential Risk Research.” Futures 102 (2018): 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan, Matthijs Maas, John Danaher, Luisa Scarcella, Michaela Lexer, and Leonard Van Rompaey. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Disruption: A New Model for Analysis.” Law, Innovation and Technology 12, no. 2 (2020): 205–258.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan, and Matthijs M. Maas. “‘Solving for X?’: Towards a Problem-Finding Framework That Grounds Long-Term Governance Strategies for Artificial Intelligence.” Futures 126 (2021). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016328720301634?via%3Dihub
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan, and Karolina Zawieska. “A New Human Rights Regime to Address Robotics and Artificial Intelligence.” JusLetter IT 2016, no. 25 February (2016) (not paginated).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Hin-Yan. “From Responsible Robotics Towards a Human Rights Regime Oriented to the Challenges of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence.” Ethics and Information Technology 22, no. 4 (2020): 321–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, Gary, Braden Allenby, and Joseph Herkert, eds. The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology 7. New York: Springer, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mistreanu, Simina. 2018. “Life Inside China’s Social Credit Laboratory.” Foreign Policy, 3 April. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/03/life-inside-chinas-social-credit-laboratory/.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Ian. Foragers, Farmers, and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald A. The Design of Everyday Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, Ronald W. “What Is a Disaster?” In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by Havidan Rodriguez, Enrico Quarantelli, and Russell Dynes, 1–15. New York: Springer, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, James. “Human Error: Models and Management.” British Medical Journal 320, no. 7237 (2000): 768–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, John G. The Blind Men and the Elephant. Boston, MA: J. Osgood, 1872.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, Sarah. “Architectural Exclusion: Discrimination and Segregation Through Physical Design of the Built Environment.” Yale Law Journal 124, no. 6 (2014): 1836–2201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammers, Neil. “Human Rights and Power.” Political Studies 41, no. 1 (1993): 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susser, Daniel. “Invisible Influence: Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Adaptive Choice Architectures.” In Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society. Honolulu, Hawaii, 2019. http://www.aies-conference.com/wp-content/papers/main/AIES-19_paper_54.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, Daniel, Beate Roessler, and Helen Nissembaum. “Online manipulation: Hidden Influences in a Digital World.” Georgetown Law Technology Review 4(2019): 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, Daniel, Beate Roessler, and Helen Nissenbaum. “Technology, Autonomy, and Manipulation.” Internet Policy Review 8, no. 2 (2019): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. London: Penguin, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, Scott. Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering. Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109, no. 1 (1980): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner, Benjamin, Piers Blaikie, Terry Cannon, and Ian Davis. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, Karen. “‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a Mode of Regulation by Design.” Information, Communication & Society 20, no. 1 (2017): 118–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. “‘We Make Them Dance’: Surveillance Capitalism, the Rise of Instrumental Power, and the Threat to Human Rights.” In Human Rights in the Age of Platforms, edited by Rikke Frank Jørgensen, 3–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar