References
- Acadia, S. (2016). Books be gone! reducing an academic library’s print collection by half to meet strategic planning initiatives and participate in a joint library resource-sharing facility. Journal of Library Administration, 56(2), 144–157. doi:10.1080/01930826.2015.1105668
- Borin, J., & Yi, H. (2011). Assessing an academic library collection through capacity and usage indicators: Testing a multi-dimensional model. Collection Building, 30(3), 120–125. doi:10.1108/01604951111146956
- Burton, F., & Kattau, M. (2013). Out of sight but not lost to view: Macquarie university library’s stored print collection. Australian Academic & Research Libraries: Special Issue on Shared Print Storage, 44(2), 102–113. doi:10.1080/00048623.2013.795473
- Gillies, S., & Stephenson, C. (2012). Three libraries, three weeding projects: Collaborative weeding projects within a shared print repository. Collection Management: Shared Print Repositories, 37(3–4), 205–222. doi:10.1080/01462679.2012.685420y
- Guenther, K. (2000). Applying data mining principles to library data collection. Computers in Libraries, 20(4), 60–63. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/231142047/
- Holderman, S. (2017). The decline of circulation: Reversing the trend through technology checkout. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(5), 451–453. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2017.07.004
- Kelly, M. (2014). Applying the tiers of assessment: A holistic and systematic approach to assessing library collections. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(6), 585–591. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.002
- Kessler, J. (2013). “Use it or lose it! results of a use study of the print sources in an academic library reference Collection.”. The Reference Librarian, 54(1), 61–72. doi:10.1080/02763877.2013.738120
- Knowlton, S., & Hackert, L. (2015). Value added: Book covers provide additional impetus for academic library patrons to check out books. Library Resources & Technical Services, 59(3), 112–119. doi:10.5860/lrts.59n3.11
- Ladwig, J., & Miller, T. (2013). Are first-circulation patterns for monographs in the humanities different from the sciences? Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 37(3–4), 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2013.09.004
- Payne, S. (2017). Project feedback loops: Visualizing collection evaluation decisions. Serials Review: North Carolina Serials Conference 2017, 43(3–4), 251–255. doi:10.1080/00987913.2017.1370301
- Pickle, S., & Lubas, R. (2019). Crafting an active print collection for the academic library: A case study from the claremont colleges library. Collection Management: Special Issue on Imagining the Future Academic Library Collection, 44(2–4), 348–360. doi:10.1080/01462679.2019.1567426
- Rose-Wiles, L. (2013). Are print books dead? an investigation of book circulation at a mid-sized academic library. Technical Services Quarterly, 30(2), 129–152. doi:10.1080/07317131.2013.759496
- Tyler, D., Falci, C., Melvin, J., Epp, M., & Kreps, A. (2013). Patron-driven acquisition and circulation at an academic library: Interaction effects and circulation performance of print books acquired via librarians’ orders, approval plans, and patrons’ interlibrary loan requests. Collection Management, 38(1), 3–32. doi:10.1080/01462679.2012.73049