1,442
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Dialogical reflexivity in supervision: An experiential learning process for enhancing reflective and relational competencies

, &

References

  • Bambling, M., King, R., Raue, P., Schweitzer, R., & Lambert, W. (2006). Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 317–331.
  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Billings, D., & Kowalski, K. (2006). Journaling: A strategy for developing reflective practitioners. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 37, 104–105.
  • Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2007). When values collide: Field instructors' experiences of providing feedback an devaluating competence. The Clinical Supervisor, 26, 99–117.
  • Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.
  • Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research in the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 13–37). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Bromberg, P. M. (1982). The supervisory process and parallel process in psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 92–110.
  • Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scribner.
  • Caligor, L. (1984). Parallel and reciprocal processes in psychoanalytic supervision. In L. Caligor, P. M. Bromberg, & J. D. Meltzer (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Crits-Christoph, P., Gibbons, M. B. C., & Hearon, B. (2006). Does the alliance cause good outcome? Recommendations for future research on the alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 280–285.
  • Crowe, T. P., Oades, L. G., Deane, F. P., Ciarrochi, J., & Williams, V. (2011). Parallel processes in clinical supervision: Implications for coaching mental health practitioners. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 9, 56–66.
  • Doehrman, M. J. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40, 9–104.
  • Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322–329.
  • Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Ensink, K., Maheux, J., Normandin, L., Sabourn, S., Diguer, L., Berthelot, N., & Parent, K. (2013). The impact of mentalization training on the reflective function of novice therapists: A randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 526–538.
  • Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2010). Psychotherapy-based supervision models in an emerging competency-based era: A commentary. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 45–50.
  • Fouad, N. A., Grus, C. L., Hatcher, R. L., Kaslow, N. J., Hutchings, P. S., Madson, M. B., Crossman, R. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4), S5–S26.
  • Gediman, H. K., & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as triadic system. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, XLIX, 234–255.
  • Gizara, S. S., & Forrest, L. (2004). Supervisors' experiences of trainee impairment and incompetence at APA accredited internship sites. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 131–140.
  • Glickauf-Hughes, C., & Campbell, L. F. (1991). Experiential supervision: Applied techniques for a case presentation approach. Psychotherapy, 28, 625–635.
  • Gonsalvez, C. J., & Calvert, F. L. (2014). Competency-based models of supervision: Principles and applications, promises and challenges. Australian Psychologist, 49, 200–208.
  • Gonsalvez, C. J., Oades, L. G., & Freestone, J. (2002). The objectives approach to clinical supervision: Towards integration and empirical evaluation. Australian Psychologist, 37, 68–77.
  • Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Supervision as a pedagogy: Attending to its essential instructional and learning processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 33, 82–99.
  • Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees' experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 371–383.
  • Haber, R., Marshall, D., Cowan, K., Vanlandingham, A., Gerson, M., & Fitch, J. C. (2009). “Live” supervision of supervision: “Perpendicular” interventions in parallel processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 28, 72–90.
  • Hallett, C. E. (1997). Learning through reflection in the community: The relevance of Schön's theories of coaching to nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34, 103–110.
  • Hardy, G., Cahill, J., & Barkham, M. (2007). Active ingredients of the therapeutic relationship that promote client change: A research perspective. In P. Gilbert & R. Leahy (Eds.), The therapeutic relationship in the cognitive behavioural psychotherapies (pp. 24–42). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Heatherington, L., Constantino, M. J., Friedlander, M. L., Angus, L. E., & Messer, S. B. (2012). Clients' perspectives on corrective experiences in psychotherapy. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), Transformation in psychotherapy: Corrective experiences across cognitive behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic approaches (pp. 161–190). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hill, H. R., Crowe, T. P., & Gonsalvez, C. J. (2015). Reflective dialogue in clinical supervision: A pilot study involving collaborative review of supervision videos. Psychotherapy Research, Advance online publication.10.1080/10503307.2014.996795 .
  • Holloway, E. L., & Carroll, M. (1999). Training counselling supervisors. London, UK: Sage.
  • James, I. A., Allen, K., & Collerton, D. (2004). A post-hoc analysis of emotions in supervision: A new methodology for examining process features. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 507–513.
  • Jenkins, S. (2010). Relationships. In J. C. Thomas & M. Hersen (Eds.), The handbook of clinical psychology competencies (pp. 123–152). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Kagan, N. (1980). Influencing human interaction- eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research & practice (pp. 262–286). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Kaslow, N. J., & Bell, K. D. (2008). A competency-based approach to supervision. In C. A. Falender & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.), Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency- based approach (pp. 39–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Knox, S., Hess, S. A., Hill, C. E., Burkard, A. W., & Crook-Lyon, R. (2012). Corrective relational experiences in psychotherapy. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), Transformation in psychotherapy: Corrective experiences across cognitive, behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic approaches (pp. 191–213). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Ladany, N. (2004). Psychotherapy supervision: What lies beneath. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 1–19.
  • Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 447–455.
  • Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 10–24.
  • Mangione, L., & Nadkarni, L. (2010). The relationship competency: Broadening and deepening. In M. B. Kenkel & R. L. Peterson (Eds.), Competency-based education for professional psychology (pp. 69–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 595–621.
  • Markovitz, J. C., & Milrod, B. L. (2011). The importance of responding to negative affect in psychotherapies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 124–128.
  • Morrissey, J., & Tribe, R. (2001). Parallel process in supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14, 103–110.
  • National Council of Schools and Programs in Professional Psychology. (2007). Competency developmental achievement levels (DALs) of the National Council of Schools and Programs in Professional Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.thencspp.com/DALof%20NCSPP%209-21-07.pdf.
  • Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at the conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 384–395. doi:10.1037/0022-167.48.384.
  • Neufeldt, S. A. (1999). Training in reflective processes in supervision. In M. Carroll & E. L. Holloway (Eds.), Education of clinical supervisors (pp. 92–105). London, UK: Sage.
  • North, G. J. (2013). Recording supervision: Educational, therapeutic, and enhances the supervisory working alliance? Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13, 61–70.
  • O'Donovan, A., Halford, W. K., & Walters, B. (2011). Towards best practice supervision of clinical psychology trainees. Australian Psychologist, 46, 101–112.
  • Orchowski, L., Evangelista, N. M., & Probst, D. R. (2010). Enhancing supervisee reflectivity in clinical supervision. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 51–67.
  • Osborn, C. J., Paez, S. B., & Carribean, C. L. (2007). Reflections on shared practices in supervisory lineage. The Clinical Supervisor, 26, 119–139.
  • Page, S., & Wosket, V. (2014). Supervising the counsellor and psychotherapist (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Pisani, A. (2005). Talk to me: Supervisee disclosure in supervision. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 75, 29–47.
  • Pistole, M. C., & Watkins, C. E. (1995). Attachment theory, counselling process, and supervision. The Counselling Psychologist, 23, 457–478.
  • Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primavera, L. H., & Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 15, 37–48.
  • Rodolfa, E. R., Bent, R. J., Eisman, E., Nelson, P. D., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A cube model for competency development: Implications for psychology educators and regulators. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 347–354.
  • Rubin, N. J., Bebeau, M., Leigh, I. W., Lichtenberg, J. W., Nelson, P. D., Portnoy, S., & Kaslow, N. J. (2007). The competency movement within psychology: An historical perspective. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 452–462. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.452.
  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (1996). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 447–458.
  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2001). A relational approach to training and supervision in cognitive psychotherapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 15, 3–15.
  • Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48, 80–87.
  • Schlessinger, N. (1966). Supervision of psychotherapy: A critical review of the literature. Archives of General Psychiatry, 15, 129–134.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experiences. Psychiatry, 18, 135–146.
  • Tracey, T. J. G., Bludworth, J., & Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision? An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49, 330–343.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (1995). Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 32, 333–340.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 557–590.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., Budge, S. L., & Callahan, J. L. (2015). Common and specific factors converging in psychotherapy supervision: A supervisory extrapolation of the Wampold/Budge psychotherapy relationship model. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25, 214–235.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Riggs, S. A. (2012). Psychotherapy supervision and attachment theory: Review, reflections, and recommendations. The Clinical Supervisor, 31, 256–289.
  • Williams, A. B. (2000). Contribution of supervisors' covert communication to the parallel process. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 61, 1165.
  • Worthen, V., & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of “good” supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25–34.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.