A relational approach: a profile of Helen Beinart

References

• Beinart, H. (2002) An exploration of the factors which predict the quality of the relationship in clinical supervision [Unpublished DClinPsych thesis]. Open University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, H. (2014). Building and sustaining the supervisory relationship. In C. E. Watkins Jr. & D. L. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 255–281). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, H., & Clohessy, S. (2017). Effective supervisory relationships: Best evidence and practice. Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, H., & Golding, L. (2015). Group of Trainers in Clinical Psychology and Recognition (STAR) guidance on learning outcomes for advanced supervisor training: The desired characteristics of experienced and effective clinical psychology supervisors. Clinical Psychology Forum, 266, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
   Google Scholar
• Borsay, C. (2012) Understanding the supervisory relationship and what happens when difficulties occur [Unpublished DClinPsych thesis]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Carifio, M. S., & Hess, A. K. (1987). Who is the ideal supervisor?. Professional psychology, research and practice, 18(3), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.18.3.244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliffe, T., Beinart, H., & Cooper, M. (2014). Development and validation of a short version of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 23(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clohessy, S. (2008) Supervisors’ perspectives on their supervisory relationships: A qualitative study [Unpublished PsyD thesis]. University of Hull, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology, British Psychological Society. (2014) . DCP policy on continued supervision. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of counseling psychology, 37(3), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, K. (2004). A longitudinal exploration of the supervisory relationship. Unpublished DClinPsych thesis, University of Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., Schofield, M. J., & Crawford, S. (2012). Managing difficulties in supervision: Supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of counseling psychology, 59(4), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the Evaluation Process within Supervision Inventory. Journal of counseling psychology, 48(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoir, V. (2013). Difference and disclosure in supervision. Unpublished DClinPsych thesis, University of Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. L., Barnes, K. L., Evans, A. L., & Triggiano, P. J. (2008). Working with conflict in clinical supervision: Wise supervisors’ perspectives. Journal of counseling psychology, 55(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerdrum, P., & Ronnestad, M. H. (2002). The trainees’ perspective: A qualitative study of learning empathic communication in Norway. The Counseling psychologist, 30(4), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/00100002030004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, M., Beinart, H. & Cooper, M.J. (2010). Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 131–149 doi:10.1348/014466509X441033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, N., Beinart, H., Clohessy, S., & Cooper, M. (2013). Development and validation of the supervisory relationship measure: A self-report questionnaire for use with supervisors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of consulting psychology, 21(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scaife, J. (2013). Supervision in clinical practice: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• Tangen, J. L., & Borders, L. D. (2016). The supervisory relationship: A conceptual and psychometric review of measures. Counselor Education and Supervision, 55(3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trethowan Committee (1977). The role of psychologists in the health services. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011). The real relationship in psychotherapy supervision. American journal of psychotherapy, 65(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2011.65.2.99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2015). The real relationship in psychotherapy supervision. A transtheoretical common factor. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 19, 20–26.
   Google Scholar