412
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Social Working of Legal Rules

Pages 1-84 | Published online: 02 Dec 2013

References

  • Abel, E. 1981 ‘Collective protest and the meritocracy: faculty women and sex discrimination lawsuits.’ Feminist Studies 7: 505–538.
  • Adams, M. 2001 ‘Euthanasia: the process of legal change in Belgium. Reflections on the parliamentary debate.’ Pp. 29–47 in A. Klijn, M. Otlowski and M. Trappenburg, ed., Regulating Physician-Negotiated Death. The Hague: Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie bv.
  • Allott, A. 1980 The Limits of Law. London: Butterworths.
  • Anspach, R. 1993 Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Asscher-Vonk, L. and C. Groenendijk 1999 Gelijke behandeling: regels en realiteit [Equal Treatment: Rules and Reality]. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.
  • Aubert, V. 1966 ‘Some social functions of legislation.’ Acta Sociologica 10: 98–121.
  • Benda-Beckmann, F. von 1989 ‘Scape-goat and magic charm: law in development theory and practice.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 28: 129–148.
  • Benda-Beckmann, K. von 1988 ‘De ongrijpbaarheid van informeel recht’. Recht der Werkelijkheid 9/1: 91–99.
  • Black, D. 1973 ‘The mobilization of law.’ Journal of Legal Studies 2: 125–149; reprinted pp. 41–63 in The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
  • Black, D. 1976 The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.
  • Black, D. 1980 ‘Dispute settlement by the police.’ Pp 109–192 in The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.
  • Black, D. 1993 ‘Social control as a dependent variable.’ Pp. 1–26 in D. Black, The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Black, D. 2000 ‘Dreams of pure sociology.’ Sociological Theory 18: 345–367.
  • Blankenburg, E. 1980 ‘Mobilisierung von Recht [Mobilization of law].’ Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 1980/1: 33.
  • Blankenburg, E. 1995 Mobilisierung des Rechts [Mobilization of Law]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Bogert, W.A. 2002 Consequences. The Impact of Law and its Complexity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Bohannan, P. 1965 ‘The differing realms of the law.’ Pp. 33–42 in L. Nader, ed., The Ethnography of Law. American Anthropologist vol. 67, nr. 6, pt. 2.
  • Cialdini, R., C. Kallgren and R. Reno 1991 ‘A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior.’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234.
  • Coleman, J.1990 Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Collier, J. 1976 ‘Political leadership and legal change in Zinacantan.’ Law and Society Review 11: 131–163.
  • Davis, K. 1969 Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Doyle, D. 1978 The Social Order of a Frontier Community. Jacksonville, Illinois 1825–70. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Edelman, L. n.d. ‘Constructing legalities: socio-legal fields and the endogeneity of law.’ Forthcoming in W. Powell and D. Jones, ed., Bending the Bars of the Iron Cage: Institutional Dynamics and Processes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Edelman, L. 2002 ‘Legality and the endogeneity of law.’ In R. Kagan, M. Krygier and K. Winston, ed., Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick. IGS Press/Roman & Littlefield.
  • Edelman, L., S. FULLER and I. MARA-DRITA 2001 ‘Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law.’ American Journal of Sociology 106: 1589–1641.
  • Edelman, L., H. ERLANGER and J. LANDE 1993 ‘Internal dispute resolution: the transformation of civil rights in the workplace.’ Law and Society Review 27: 497–534.
  • Edelman, L., C. UGGEN and H. ERLANGER 1999 ‘The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth.’ American Journal of Sociology 105: 406–454.
  • Ehrlich, E. 1936 The Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press (first German edition 1913).
  • Eisenberg, M. 1976 ‘Private ordering through negotiation: dispute-settlement and rulemaking.’ Harvard Law Review 89: 637–681.
  • Ellickson, R. 1991 Order without Law. How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Elster, J. 1989 The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fallers, L. 1969 Law without Precedent. Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Felstiner, W., R. Abel and A. Sarat 1981 ‘The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming…’ Law and Society Review 15: 631–654.
  • Freidson, E. 1975 Doctoring Together: A Study of Professional Social Control. New York: Elsevier.
  • Fuller, L. 1964 The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press [revised edition 1969].
  • Fuller, L. 1969 ‘Human interaction and the law.’ American Journal of Jurisprudence 14: 1–36.
  • Galanter, M. 1974 ‘Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change.’ Law and Society Review 9: 95–160.
  • Galanter, M. 1981 ‘Justice in many rooms: courts, private ordering and indigenous law.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 19: 1–47.
  • Garth, B. and A. SARAT 1998 ‘Studying how law matters: an introduction.’ Pp. 1–14 in B. Garth and A. Sarat, eds., How Does Law Matter?. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
  • Ginkel, R. van 1989 ‘‘Plunderers into Planters: Zeeland oystermen and the enclosure of the marine commons.’ Pp. 89–105 in J. Boissevain and J. Verrips, eds., Dutch Dilemmas: Anthropologists Look at the Netherlands. Assen: Van Gorcum.
  • Goffman, E. 1961 Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates. Pelican: Harmondsworth.
  • Greenhouse, C. 1982 ‘Nature is to culture as praying is to suing: legal pluralism in an American suburb.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 20: 17–35.
  • Griffiths, J. 1978 ‘Is law important?’ N.Y. Univ. Law Rev. 54: 339–374.
  • Griffiths, J.1984a ‘The division of labor in social control.’ Pp. 37–70 in D. Black, ed., Toward a General Theory of Social Control (deel I, ‘Fundamentals’). Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
  • Griffiths, J.1984b ‘The general theory of litigation - a first step.’ Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 5: 145–201.
  • Griffiths, J.1984c ‘Village justice in the Netherlands’ (review article on Van den Bergh 1980). Journal of Legal Pluralism 23: 17–42.
  • Griffiths, J.1985 ‘Four laws of interaction in circumstances of legal pluralism: first steps toward an explanatory theory.’ Pp. 217–227 in A. Allott and G. Woodman, ed., People’s Law and State Law: The Bellagio Papers. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  • Griffiths, J.1986a ‘What is legal pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1–55.
  • Griffiths, J.1986b ‘What do Dutch lawyers actually do in divorce cases, with special reference to custody and visitation?’ Law and Society Review 20: 135–175.
  • Griffiths, J.1986c ‘De rechtspsychologische benadering van rechterlijk beslissingsgedrag: enkele kanttekeningen bij recent Nederlands onderzoek’ [The legalpsychological approach to judicial decisionmaking: some comments in connection with recent Dutch research]. Mens en Maatschappij 61: 199–208.
  • Griffiths, J.1990 ‘De sociale werking van rechtsregels en het emancipatoire potentiëel van wetgeving [The social working of legal rules and the emancipatory potential of legislation].’ Recht der Werkelijkheid 1990/2: 27–46.
  • Griffiths, J.1991 ‘Legal pluralism and the social working of law.’ In A. Soeteman e.a., ed., Coherence and Conflicts Concerning the Law. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink.
  • Griffiths, J.1995a ‘Legal pluralism and the theory of legislation – with special reference to the regulation of euthanasia.’ In H. Zahle and H. Petersen, ed., Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law. Aldershot: DartmouthPub. Co.
  • Griffiths, J.1995b ‘Normative and ‘rational choice’ accounts of human social behavior.’ European Journal of Law and Economics 2: 285–299.
  • Griffiths, J.1996a ‘De sociale werking van recht [The social working of law].’ Pp. 469–513 in J. Griffiths, ed., De sociale werking van recht. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
  • Griffiths, J.1999a ‘Legal knowledge and the social working of law: the case of euthanasia.’ Pp. 81–108 in H. van Schooten, ed., Semiotics and Legislation. Jurisprudential, Institutional and Sociological Perspectives. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
  • Griffiths, J.1999b ‘The social working of anti-discrimination law.’ Pp. 313–330 in T. Loenen and P.R. Rodrigues, ed., Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Griffiths, J.2000 ‘Self-regulation by the Dutch medical profession of medical behavior that potentially shortens life.’ Pp. 173–190 in H. Krabbendam en H.M. ten Napel, ed., Regulating Morality. Antwerpen: Maklu
  • Griffiths, J., A. BOOD and H. WEYERS 1998 Euthanasia and Law in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Grönfors, M. 1986 ‘Social feuding and law in the Finnish gypsy community: blood feuding as a system of justice.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 101–125.
  • Gusfield, J. 1963 Symbolic Crusade. Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Hart, H. 1961 The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hawkins, K. 1984 Environment and Enforcement. Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hirschi, T. 1969 The Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Holleman, J. 1973 ‘Trouble-cases and trouble-less cases in the study of customary law and legal reform.’ Law and Society Review 7: 585–609.
  • Homans, G. 1951 The Human Group. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Honoré, T. 1987 Making Law Bind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Hyde, A. 1983 ‘The concept of legitimacy in the sociology of law.’ Wisconsin Law Review 1983: 379–426.
  • Jackson, B. 1996 Making Sense in Law. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
  • Jacobs, J. 1961 The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
  • Jong, L. de 1974, 1975, 1976 Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog [The Kindgom of the Netherlands during the Second World War], volumes 5, 6 and 7.
  • Jutras, D. 2001 ‘The legal dimensions of everyday life.’ Canadian Journal of Law and Society 16: 45–65.
  • Kagan, R. 1978 Regulatory Justice: Implementing a Wage-Price Freeze. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Kagan, R. 1989 ‘Understanding regulatory enforcement.’ Law and Policy 11: 89–119.
  • Kagan, R. and J. Skolnick 1993 ‘Banning smoking: compliance without enforcement.’ Pp. 69–94 in R. Rubin and S.D. Sugarman, ed., Smoking Policy: Law, Politics and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kapteyn, P. 1980 Taboe, macht en moraal in Nederland [Taboo, Power and Morality in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.
  • Kidder, R. 1979 ‘Toward an integrated theory of imposed law.’ Pp. 289–306 in S.B. Burman and B.E. Harrell-Bond, ed., The Imposition of Law. New York: Academic Press.
  • Klijn, A. 2001 ‘Will doctors’ behavior be more accountable under the new Dutch regime? Reporting and consultation as forms of legal control.’ Pp. 157- 178 in A. Klijn, M. Otlowski and M. Trappenburg, ed., Regulating Physician-Negotiated Death. The Hague: Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie bv.
  • Levi, E. 1949 An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lipsky, M. 1980 Street-Level Bureaucracy - Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Macaulay, S. 1963 ‘Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study.’ Law and Society Review 28: 55–67.
  • Macaulay, S.1979 ‘Lawyers and consumer protection laws.’ Law and Society Review 14: 115–171.
  • Macaulay, S.1995 ‘Crime and custom in business society.’ Journal of Law and Society 22: 248–258.
  • Macdonald, R. 2002 Website of the Law Commission of Canada: http://www.lcc.gc.ca (accessed 5 Aug. 2002).
  • Massell, G. 1968 ‘Law as an instrument of revolutionary change in a traditional milieu: the case of Soviet Central Asia.’ Law and Society Review 2: 179–228 .
  • Mayhew, L. 1968 Law and Equal Opportunity: A Study of the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • McEvoy, A. 1986 The Fisherman’s Problem. Ecology and Law in the California Fisheries,1850-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McKay, B. and J. Acheson 1987 The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Merry, S. 1990 Getting Justice and Getting Even. Legal Consciousness among Working- Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Moore, S. 1973 ‘Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study.’ Law and Society Review 7: 719–746.
  • Moore, S. 1998 ‘Changing African land tenure: reflections on the incapacities of the state.’ European Journal of Development Research 10: 33–49.
  • Mortier, F. and L. Deliens 2001 ‘The prospects of effective legal control of euthanasia in Belgium: implications of recent end-of-life studies.’ Pp. 179–194 in A. Klijn, M. Otlowski and M. Trappenburg, ed., Regulating Physician-negotiated Death. The Hague: Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie bv.
  • Myrdal, G. 1970 The Challenge of World Poverty. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
  • Nowenstein, G. 2003 ‘The non-application of the law of presumed consent to organ donation in French hospitals. A study of the failure of an attempt to modify behaviour by law’. Unpublished paper delivered to the MBPSL research group, Department of Legal Theory, University of Groningen, 11 June 2003..
  • Oden, P. 1993 Voorkeursbeleid op lokaal niveau. Een rechtssociologisch onderzoek naar de sociale werking van maatregelen ter verbetering van de arbeidspositie van vrouwen bij de gemeentelijke overheid [Affirmative Action at the Local Level: A Socio-Legal Study of the Social Working of Measures to Improve the Position of Women in the Workforce of City Governments]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
  • Otlowski, M. 1997 Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Outshoorn, J. 1986 De politieke strijd rondom de abortuswetgeving in Nederland [The Political Struggle over Abortion Legislation in the Netherlands]. The Hague: VUGA.
  • Pozen, R. 1976 Legal Choices for State Enterprises in the Third World. New York: New York University Press.
  • Pressman, J. and A. Wildavsky 1973 Implementation. How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Reisman, M. 1999 Law in Brief Encounters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Scheingold, S. 1974 The Politics of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Schwartz, R. 1954 ‘Social factors in the development of legal control: a study case study of two Israeli settlements.’ Yale Law Journal 63: 471–491.
  • Scott, J. 1998 Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Scott, J.F. 1971 Internalization of Norms: A Sociological Theory of Moral Commitment. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Snell, M. 1979 ‘The Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts: their impact in the workplace.’ Feminist Review 1979/1: 37–57.
  • Strijbosch, F. 1985 ‘The concept of pela and its social significance in the community of Moluccan immigrants in the Netherlands.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 23: 177–208.
  • Sudnow, D. 1976 Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sunstein, C. 1996 ‘Social norms and social roles.’ Columbia Law Review 96: 903–968.
  • Sumner, W. 1906 Folkways. A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores and Morals. Boston: Ginn and Company.
  • Sykes, G. 1958 The Society of Captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Taale, T. and J. Griffiths 1995 The Role of Law in the Protection of the Tropical Forest in Ecuador’s Amazonian Region. Groningen: Faculty of Law, University of Groningen.
  • Todd, H. 1978 ‘Litigious marginals: character and disputing in a Bavarian village.’ Pp. 86–121 in L. Nader and H.F. Todd, ed., The Disputing Process - Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Verkruisen, G. 1993 Dissatisfied Patients: Their Experiences, Interpretations and Actions. Dissertation, University of Groningen.
  • Verkruyten, M. et al. 1994 ‘Rules for breaking formal rules: social representations and everyday rulegoverned behavior.’ Journal of Psychology 128: 485–497.
  • Vezzoni, C. and J. Griffiths 2001 A Comparative Study of the Legal Status and Social Practice of Advance Directives, First Interim Report. Groningen: Faculty of Law, Department of Legal Theory.
  • Vries, P. de 1949 Geschiedenis van het verzet der artsen in Nederland [History of the Resistance by Dutch Doctors]. Haarlem: H.D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon.
  • Weyers, H. 2001 ‘Euthanasia: the process of legal change in the Netherlands; the making of the requirements of careful practice.’ Pp. 11–27 in A. Klijn, M. Otlowski and M. Trappenburg, ed., Regulating Physician-Negotiated Death. The Hague: Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie.
  • Woodman, G. 1983 ‘The limits of ‘The Limits of Law’.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 21: 129–146.
  • Yngvesson, B. 1976 ‘Responses to grievance behavior: extended cases in a fishing community.’ American Ethnologist 3: 353–373.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.