Introduction to the Special Issue: Legal Pluralism and International Development Interventions

References

• Albrecht, Peter 2010 ‘Betwixt and between – chiefs and reform of Sierra Leone’s Justice Sector.’ DIIS Working Paper 2010: 33
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Peter and Helene Maria Kyed 2010 ‘Justice and Security. When the State isn’t the main Provider’, DIIS Policy Brief, December 2010, Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Peter and Helene Maria Kyed 2011 ‘Introduction: Non-State and Customary Actors in Development programs’. Pp. 3–2 in Peter Albrecht, Helene Maria Kyed, Erica Harper and Deborah Isser (eds.), Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, Peter, Helene Maria Kyed, Erica Harper and Deborah Isser (eds.) 2011 Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• Allott, Antony and Gordon Woodman (eds.) 1985 People’s Law and State Law. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Benda-Beckman, Franz von 1997 ‘Citizens, Strangers and Indigenous peoples: Conceptual Politics and Legal Pluralism.’ Law and Anthropology, 9: 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann and Julia Eckert (eds.) 2009 Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling: on the governance of law. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, Kevin .P.; Volker Boege; M. Anne Brown; Anna Nolan and; Wendy Foley 2007 ‘State Building Reconsidered: The Role of Hybridity in the Formation of Political Order.’ Political Science 59(01): 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, M. Anne Brown and Kevin P. Clements 2009 ‘Hybrid Political orders, Not Fragile States.’ Peace Review 21/1: 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. Anne 2009 ‘The pursuit of grounds’. Pp.55–90 in M. Anne Brown (ed.), Human Rights and the Borders of Suffering. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. Anne; Volker Boege, Kevin P. Clements and Anna Nolan 2010 ‘Challenging statebuilding as peacebuilding – working with hybrid political orders to build peace.’ Pp. 99–116 in Oliver P. Richmond (ed.), Palgrave Advances in Peacebuilding. Critical Developments and Approaches, Basingtoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chirayath Leila, Caroline Sage and Michael Woolcock 2005 ‘Customary Law and Policy Reform: Engaging with the Plurality of Justice Systems’ (World Bank Background Paper, July 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, Tanja and Deborah Isser 2011 ‘Women’s Access to Justice, Legal Pluralism and Fragile States’. Pp. 23–38 in Peter Albrecht, Helene Maria Kyed, Erica Harper and Deborah Isser (eds.), Perspectives on Involving Non-State and Customary Actors in Justice and Security Reform. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• Danida 2010 How to Note on Informal Justice Systems. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• DFID (Department for International Development) 2004 Non-State Justice and Security Systems. London: DFID.
   Google Scholar
• Golup, Stephen 2003 ‘Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy. The Legal Empowerment Alternative’. working papers, Rule of Law Series 41, October, Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, John 1986 ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24: 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Thomas Blom and Finn Stepputat (eds.) 2001 States of Imagination. Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Thomas Blom and Finn Stepputat (eds.) 2005 Sovereign Bodies. Citizens, Migrants and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Erica 2011 Customary Justice: From program Design to Impact Evaluation. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• Isser, Deborah (ed.) 2011 Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies, Washington: United States Institute for Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Trevor and Tim Newborn 2006 Plural Policing. A Comparative Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ICHRP (International Council for Human Rights Policy) 2009 When Legal Worlds Overlap: Human Rights, State and Non-State Law. Geneva: ICHRP.
   Google Scholar
• Kyed, Helene Maria 2007 State Recognition of Traditional Authority. Authority, Citizenship and State Formation in Rural Post War Mozambique, PhD dissertation. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
   Google Scholar
• Kyed, Helene Maria2009 ‘The Politics of Legal Pluralism: state policies on legal pluralism and their local dynamics in Mozambique.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 59: 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lambach, Daniel and Maren Kraushaar 2008 ‘Hybrid Political Orders: the Added Value of a New Concept’, Occasional Paper, Australian Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. http://www.issr.uq.edu.au/acpacs-publications (visited Oct 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Christian 2006 ‘Twilight Institutions: An Introduction.’ Development and Change 37(4): 673–684.
   Google Scholar
• Mamdani, Mahmood 1996 Citizen and Subject. Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engel 1988 ‘Legal Pluralism.’ Law & Society Review 22/5: 869–895.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Sally Falk 1973 ‘Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study.’ Law & Society Review 7: 719–746.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) 2007 Handbook on Security System Reform – Supporting Security and Justice. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) 2006 Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-conflict states: mapping the justice sector. New York & Geneva: OHCHR
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, J.N. 2001 Hybridity, So What? The Anti-hybridity Backlash and the Riddles of Recognition, Theory, Culture and Society, 18 (2–3): 219–245.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Donald I. and E. Adriaan B. van Rouveroy Van Nieuwaal 1996 ‘Introduction. The New Relevance of Traditional Authorities in Africa.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 37–38: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rouveroy Van Nieuwaal, E. Adriaan B. van, and Rijk van Dijk (eds.) 1999 African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-Political Landscape. Leiden: African Studies Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 2003 ‘O Estado heterogéneo e o pluralismo jurídico’. Pp. 47–128 in Boaventura de Sousa Santos and João Carlos Trindade (eds.) Conflito e Transformação Social: Uma Paisagem das Justiças em Moçambique. Porto: Afrontamento.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 2006 ‘The Heterogeneous State and Legal Pluralism in Mozambique’. Law and Society Review 40(1): 39–76.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, Chris and Susan Wright 1997 Anthropology of Policy. Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2008 ‘Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global.’ Sydney Law Review 30/3: 375–411.
   Google Scholar
• Ubink, Janine and Thomas Mcinerney (eds.) 2011 Customary Justice: perspectives on Legal Empowerment. Leiden: University of Leiden, Faculty of Law. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• Ubink, Janine and Benjamin von Rooij 2011 ‘Towards Customary Legal Empowerment: An Introduction.’ Pp. 7–28 in Janine Ubink and Thomas McInerney (eds.), Customary Justice: perspectives on Legal Empowerment. Leiden: University of Leiden, Faculty of Law. Rome: International Development Law Organisation (IDLO).
   Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) 2009 Community Security and Social Cohesion. Towards a UNDP Approach (2009) 9.
   Google Scholar
• USAID (United States Agency for International Development) 2005 Field Study of Informal and Customary Justice in Afghanistan and Recommendations on Improving Access to Justice and Relations between Formal Courts and Informal Bodies, Washington DC: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• USAID (United States Agency for International Development) 2009 Security Sector Reform (February 2009). Washington DC: US Agency for International Development, US Department of Defence, and US Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max 1978 Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. (2 volumes). Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, Gordon R. 1998 ‘Ideological combat and social observation: recent debate about legal pluralism.’ Journal of Legal Pluralism 42: 21–59.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank 2011 World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. Washington DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wood Jennifer and Clifford Shearing 2007 Imagining Security. Portland: Willan Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Zips Werner and Markus Weilenmann (eds.) 2011 The Governance of Legal Pluralism. Empirical Studies from Africa and Beyond. Wein and Berlin: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar