Shoddy heap: a material history between waste and manufacture

References

• Andrews, Arthur. Rags: Being an Explanation of Why They Are Used in Making Paper. n.p., 1928.
   Google Scholar
• “The Batley Rag and Shoddy Sales.” Excerpted in full in Jubb, A History of the Shoddy Trade, 35–37, 1855.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, Brian. The Luddite Rebellion. New York: Sutton, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Maxine. The Age of Manufactures: Industry, Innovation, and Work in Britain, 1700–1820. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Maxine. “Markets, Trade, and European Manufacture.” In Markets and Manufacture in Early Industrial Europe, edited by Maxine Berg, 3–26. London: Routledge, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, James. A Comprehensive History of the Woollen and Worsted Manufactures and the Natural and Commercial History of Sheep, from the Earliest Records to the Present Period. London: Smith, Elder, 1842.
   Google Scholar
• Black’s Picturesque Guide to Yorkshire: With Map of the Country and Numerous Plans and Views. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: A. and C. Black, 1858.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, Gary, and John Appel. “‘Shoddy’, Anti-semitism and the Civil War.” American Jewish History 82, no. 1 (1994): 43–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, Hermann. A History of the Rag Trade. London: Maclaren, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus: The Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh. Boston, MA: n.p., 1836.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, B. W. An Environmental History of Britain since the Industrial Revolution. London: Longman, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Hazel, and Alexandra Palmer, eds. Old Clothes, New Looks. London: Berg, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Tim. “‘Modernity and the Politics of Waste in Britain.” In Nature’s End: History and the Environment, edited by Sverker Sörlin and Paul Warde, 247–272. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Timothy. “Peter Lund Simmonds and the Political Ecology of Waste Utilization in Victorian Britain.” Technology and Culture 52, no. 1 (2011): 21–44.10.1353/tech.2011.0003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, Samuel L. A Muck Manual, for Farmers. 2nd ed. Lowell, MA: Bixby and Whiting, 1843.10.5962/bhl.title.42947
   Google Scholar
• “Devil’s Dust.” 1842. Spectator, March 12.
   Google Scholar
• “Devil’s Dust.” Chambers Journal of Popular Literature Science and Arts 15, no. 372 (1861): 103–105.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, David. “From Innovation to Use: Ten Eclectic Theses on the Historiography of Technology.” History and Technology 16, no. 2 (1999): 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, David. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, Friedrich. The Condition of the Working-class in England in 1844, with a Preface Written in 1892. Translated by Florence Kelley Wischnewetzky. London: Allen & Unwin, 1892.
   Google Scholar
• Floud, Roderick, and Paul Johnson. The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, Laurence, ed. Alternative Exchanges: Secondhand Circulations from the Sixteenth Century to the Present. New York: Berghan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg Madeleine. “Rags to Riches: The Second-hand Clothes Trade 1700–1978.” Costume: The Journal of the Costume Society 14 (1980): 121–135.10.1179/cos.1980.14.1.121
   Google Scholar
• Great Industries of Britain. London: Cassell, Petter, Gelpin, 1884.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Emma. A Short History of the Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, Malcolm. The History of Batley 1800–1870. Batley: n.p., 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, C. Knick. “Trade: Discovery, Mercantilism and Technology.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, edited by Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson, 175–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CHOL9780521820363
   Google Scholar
• Head, George. A Home Tour through the Manufacturing Districts of England, in the Summer of 1835. London: J. Murray, 1836.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, Herbert. The Yorkshire Woollen and Worsted Industries from the Earliest times up to the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Pat. The Genesis of Industrial Capital: A Study of the West Riding Wool Textile Industry, c. 1750–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. T., ed. The Cambridge History of Western Textiles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. T., and Pontung Kenneth. British Wool Textile Industry, 1770–1914. London: Heinemann, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, D. T., and J. C. Malin. “European Competition in Woollen and Cloth, 1870–1914: The Role of Shoddy.” Business History 32, no. 4 (1990): 66–86.10.1080/00076799000000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Ann Rosalind, and Peter Stallybrass. Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, Finn Arne. Making a Green Machine: The Infrastructure of Beverage Container Recycling. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jubb, Samuel. A History of the Shoddy Trade: Its Rise, Progress, and Present Position. London: Houlton and Wright, 1860.
   Google Scholar
• “The Labeling Bills in Congress.” Bulletin of the National Association of Wool Manufacturers 45, no. 1 (1915): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Miles. “‘Cast-off Wearing Apparell’: The Consumption and Distribution of Second-hand Clothing in Northern England during the Long Eighteenth Century.” Textile History 35, no. 1 (2004): 1–26.10.1179/004049604225015620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes, David S. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. London: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Lemire, Beverly. “Consumerism in Preindustrial and Early Industrial England: The Trade in Secondhand Clothes.” Journal of British Studies 27, no. 1 (1988): 1–24.10.1086/jbs.1988.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemire, Beverly, “Shifting Currency: The Culture and Economy of the Second Hand Trade in England c. 1600–1850.” In Old Clothes, New Looks edited by Hazel Clark and Alexandra Palmer, 29–47. London: Berg, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, Claude. La Pensée sauvage [The savage mind]. Paris: Librarie Plon, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, Peter. The London Hanged: Crime and Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century. London: Verso, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• MacBride, Samantha. Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, Gary Bryan. Productivity and Performance in the Paper Industry: Labour, Capital, and Technology in Britain and America, 1860–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511660306
   Google Scholar
• Männistö-Funk, Tiina. “The Crossroads of Technology and Tradition: Vernacular Bicycles in Rural Finland, 1880–1910.” Technology and Culture 52, no. 4 (2011): 733–756.10.1353/tech.2011.0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, Leo. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Henry. London Labour and the London Poor: A Cyclopedia of the Condition and Earnings of Those That Will Work, Those That Cannot Work, and Those That Will Not Work. vol. 1. London: G. Woodfall, 1851.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, J. R. A Dictionary, Practical, Theoretical, and Historical, of Commerce and Commercial Navigation. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1850.
   Google Scholar
• McGaw, Judith A. Most Wonderful Machine: Mechanization and Social Change in Berkshire Paper Making, 1801–1885. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Megraw, Robert H. Textiles and the Origin of Their Names. n.p., 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, N. “The History of Woolsorters’ Disease: A Yorkshire Beginning with an International Future?” Occupational Medicine 54, no. 7 (2004): 489–493.10.1093/occmed/kqh115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, J. B. “Presidential Address: Wissenschaft in Worstedopolis: Public Science in Bradford, 1800–1850.” The British Journal for the History of Science 18, no. 1 (1985): 1–23.10.1017/S0007087400021671
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Lucy. Recycling Indian Clothing: Global Contexts of Reuse and Value. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Thomas, ed. Dangerous Trades: The Historical, Social and Legal Aspects of Industrial Occupation as Affecting Health. London: Murray, 1902.
   Google Scholar
• “Protecting the Wool Standard: Truth in Fabric.” 1921. Chronicle and North Coast Advertiser, April 29.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, J. W. Woollen and Worsted Yarn Manufacture. Manchester: Emmett, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Reynard, Pierre-Claude. “Unreliable Mills: Maintenance Practices in Early Modern Papermaking.” Technology and Culture 40, no. 2 (1999): 237–262.10.1353/tech.1999.0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, Daniel. The Culture of Clothing: Dress and Fashion in the “Ancien Régime”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, John. On Garbage. London: Reaktion, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, John. “In Deadly Time: The Lasting on of Waste in Mayhew’s London.” Time and Society 16, no. 2–3 (2007): 189–206.10.1177/0961463X07080265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, Hanna Rose. “Textile Skin.” Transition 96 (2006): 152–163.
   Google Scholar
• Shell, Hanna Rose. “A Global History of Secondhand Clothing.” In Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture, edited by Henry Jenkins, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green, n.p. New York: NYU Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• The Shoddy Industry vs. The Virgin Wool Industry. Chicago, IL: National Sheep and Wool Bureau of America, 1919.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, Peter Lund. Waste Products and Undeveloped Substances: Or, Hints for Enterprise in Neglected Fields. 1st ed. London: R. Hardwicke, 1862.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds, PL. Waste Products and Undeveloped Substances: A Synopsis of Progress Made in Their Economic Utilisation during the Last Quarter of a Century at Home and Abroad. 2nd ed. London: R. Hardwicke, 1873.
   Google Scholar
• Stachiw, Myron O. “For the Sake of Art and Commerce: Slavery, Antislavery, and Northern Industry.” In The Meaning of Slavery in the North, edited by Martin H. Blatt and David R. Roediger, 33–44. London: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, Jon, and Ilja Van Damme, eds. Modernity and the Second-hand Trade: European Consumption Cultures and Practices, 1700–1900. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, Susan. Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. New York: Henry Holt, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, John A. Erskine. The Literary Shrines of Yorkshire: The Literary Pilgrim in the Dales. London: Longmans, Green, 1892.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, John, A. Erskine. “Rags and Their Products in Relation to Health.” In Dangerous Trade: The Historical, Social and Legal Aspects of Industrial Occupation as Affecting Health, edited by Thomas Oliver, 644–647. London: Murray, 1902.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, Joel A. “Searching for a ‘Sink’ for an Industrial Waste: Iron-making Fuels and the Environment.” Environmental History Review 18, no. 1 (1994): 9–34.10.2307/3984743
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Pantheon Books, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, John Peter. “The Romans in the West: 600 BC–AD 400.” In The Cambridge History of Western Textiles, edited by D. T. Jenkins, 77–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Mark R. The Business of Civil War: Military Mobilization and the State, 1861–1865. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, James. Secure from Rash Assault: Sustaining the Victorian Environment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• “The Woollen and Worsted Trade of Great Britain.” Bulletin of the National Association of Wool Manufacturers 1, no. 1 (1869): 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• “Yorkshire.” 1859. Westminster Review, 179–195, April.
   Google Scholar
• Zimring, Carl A. “The Complex Environmental Legacy of the Automobile Shredder.” Technology and Culture 52, no. 3 (2011): 523–547.10.1353/tech.2011.0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, Carl A. Cash For Your Trash: Scrap Recycling in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar