Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Volume 36, 2018 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
624
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

Unique associations of eudaimonic and hedonic wellbeing with psychosocial adjustment in breast cancer survivors

Patricia I. MorenoDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-6461View further author information
, PhD ORCID Icon,
Larissa N. DooleyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA; View further author information
, PhD &
Julienne E. BowerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA; ;Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; ;Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USAView further author information
, PhD
Pages 649-657 | Received 29 Sep 2017, Accepted 27 Apr 2018, Published online: 16 Jan 2019

References

  • Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9(1):13–39.
  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(2):276–302.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141–166.
  • Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD. Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(6):1007–1022.
  • McMahan EA, Estes D. Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Soc Indicators Res. 2011;103(1):93–108.
  • Fredrickson BL, Grewen KM, Algoe SB, et al. Psychological well-being and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. PLoS One. 2015;10(3): e0121839.
  • Voogt E, van der Heide A, van Leeuwen AF, et al. Positive and negative affect after diagnosis of advanced cancer. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(4):262–273.
  • Baker F, Denniston M, Zabora J, Polland A, Dudley WN. A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation. Psychooncology. 2002;11(4): 273–281.
  • Jim HS, Andersen BL. Meaning in life mediates the relationship between social and physical functioning and distress in cancer survivors. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12(3): 363–381.
  • Tov W, Lee HW. A closer look at the hedonics of everyday meaning and satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016;111(4):585–609.
  • Keyes CLM. The Mental Health Continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):207–222.
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–396.
  • Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.
  • Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(4):301–310.
  • Avis NE, Smith KW, McGraw S, Smith RG, Petronis VM, Carver CS. Assessing quality of life in adult cancer survivors (QLACS). Qual Life Res. 2005;14(4):1007–1023.
  • Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Traum Stress. 1996;9(3):455–471.
  • Cutrona CE, Russell DW. The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Adv Pers Relatsh. 1987;1(1):37–67.
  • Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25.
  • Arch JJ, Mitchell JL. An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) group intervention for cancer survivors experiencing anxiety at re-entry. Psychooncology. 2016;25(5):610–615.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.